|
Grex > Coop11 > #127: Cyberspace Communications finances for September, 1999 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 90 responses total. |
don
|
|
response 60 of 90:
|
Oct 9 02:28 UTC 1999 |
I understand the whole damn thing now... or close to it. I guess Jan's
different last name threw me off, and I understand the reference to it, how
Valerie and Jan were gonna work on the membership stuff but stopped when Arlo
came around.
The two things I still don't get:
1) What did cmcgee mean in #42 when he said Arlo is a wet-ware programming
project?
2) Why does Arlo's email forward to \arlo?
|
scg
|
|
response 61 of 90:
|
Oct 9 03:09 UTC 1999 |
1. Think of hardware and software, and something that babies do.
1. The \ character tells it to ignore the forwarding. So forwarding it to
\arlo puts a copy of the message in Arlo's mailbox. If it were to forward
to valerie,janc,arlo, without the \, it would deliver copies to valerie and
janc, and a copy to arlo, meaning valerie, janc, and arlo, and again that
instance of arlo would mean valerie, janc, and arlo, and so forth.
Anyhow, about that treasurer's report...
|
pfv
|
|
response 62 of 90:
|
Oct 9 13:58 UTC 1999 |
"wetware" is also a term that means the "programs" of a persons
"grey-matter" - brains, for the few huns around.. So, "wetware" is
also education/brain-washing/socialization/etc..
|
scg
|
|
response 63 of 90:
|
Oct 9 17:12 UTC 1999 |
Ah, that makes more sense. I hadn't heard the term before.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 64 of 90:
|
Oct 9 20:13 UTC 1999 |
"Software", "hardware", "wetware": the three parts of a computing environment.
|
janc
|
|
response 65 of 90:
|
Oct 10 03:05 UTC 1999 |
Oh yeah, that project. Um, maybe when Arlo learns to program....
|
mooncat
|
|
response 66 of 90:
|
Oct 10 03:29 UTC 1999 |
Heh, isn't he kind of programming right now? Programming his brain
as he figures out the standing up thing, the crawling thing, the talking
thing... <grins>
|
mcnally
|
|
response 67 of 90:
|
Oct 10 03:55 UTC 1999 |
I imagine he's already got some simple communication protocols worked out..
|
pfv
|
|
response 68 of 90:
|
Oct 10 04:09 UTC 1999 |
And, all "wetware units" come with a large number of daemons and
executables.
|
i
|
|
response 69 of 90:
|
Oct 10 21:49 UTC 1999 |
Though a brand-new wetware unit doesn't have the CPU capacity to run
much more than its BIOS.....
|
pfv
|
|
response 70 of 90:
|
Oct 10 21:54 UTC 1999 |
As I understand it, Wetware-Units are only issued with full
capacity: no augmentation can occur, nor unit-expansion.
All developments are apparently made in the Wetware algorithms,
and in database-development.
Note though, even a few millenia hasn't done much to clean up
the essential Wetware DBMS/SQL systems - this sorta' puts a
crimp in developing further Wetware, when the system can't be
trusted to remember much of anything when its wanted.
OTOH, the wetware vector-tables for FFF-operations seem to operate
fairly well.. OK, maybe best 2 of three..
|
mdw
|
|
response 71 of 90:
|
Oct 11 06:38 UTC 1999 |
(Actually, the \ is unnecessary in "janc, \arlo". Sendmail is smart
enough to recognize arlo forwarding to arlo, and will send it to arlo's
local mailbox. Grex used to run smail, which wasn't that smart, and did
need the \ ).
I don't think we want to see grex accept corporate advertising, but grex
has pretty much always received important corporate *donations*, such
as, at various times, building space, internet access, or hardware. In
some cases, the businesses have wanted or appreciated a mention, in
other cases, they have not cared or not wanted publicity concerning
their donation. Now that we're a 501c3, I think we're in a better
position to try for such donations, as long as we can find corporate
sponsors who see us as a charity and not an advertising market, I think
we can reasonably make a bigger push for corporate donations. I think
we want to try mostly for capitals improvements here, though, and not
continuing support -- continuing support generally tends to be a bad
thing in the long run. (I think one of the reasons freenets died out is
that they did see corporate and governmental sponsorship as a viable
source of continuing support.)
So far as gift memberships go, even with a low rate of continuing
memberships, it's still not the less useful or welcome to grex. It's
also important, I think, to keep in mind that there is probably *no*
strategy that is going to have both a large magnitude *and* rate of
continuing memberships. So, we need to think in terms of lots of little
things we can do for grex, rather than one magic bullet that will both
solve all our problems, and allow us to outcompete AOL in terms of
growth and size.
|
don
|
|
response 72 of 90:
|
Oct 11 14:55 UTC 1999 |
And piss off Steve Case? Ohh, the horror!
|
lilmo
|
|
response 73 of 90:
|
Oct 12 23:50 UTC 1999 |
Based upon my (admittedly limited) experience listening to radio, the 501c3
stations accept corporate sponsorships and donations, but *NOT*, technically,
advertising. That aside, I would prefer to see grex get one-time and
equipment donations than continuing sponsorships, except from other charitable
organizations and groups (eg, foundations).
|
other
|
|
response 74 of 90:
|
Oct 14 20:43 UTC 1999 |
we'd have to develop a policy regard the extent and nature of appropriate
acknowledgment of support from donors, for example, would we add a note to
motd for a certain donation per day?
|
drewmike
|
|
response 75 of 90:
|
Oct 14 22:43 UTC 1999 |
(Hey, Bass-ay, I think I know a guy who's got some paperwork started on a
topic like that.)
|
other
|
|
response 76 of 90:
|
Oct 15 02:52 UTC 1999 |
yeah, i think i do too. i am not volunteering...
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 77 of 90:
|
Oct 15 12:13 UTC 1999 |
Let's not develop a policy. Let's not solicit corporate sponsorships. Let's
leave the acknowledgements in the treasurer's postings.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 78 of 90:
|
Oct 15 22:47 UTC 1999 |
Er, that would also be a policy...
|
janc
|
|
response 79 of 90:
|
Oct 17 18:18 UTC 1999 |
Our 501(c)3 doesn't prevent us from selling advertising on Grex, not as
long as those ads are not political in nature. However, I am strongly
opposed to selling ads here. If someone with a lot of money wants an
ad, let them enter it in the classified conference with everybody else.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 80 of 90:
|
Oct 19 02:18 UTC 1999 |
Sounds good to me.
|
keesan
|
|
response 81 of 90:
|
Nov 13 02:16 UTC 1999 |
What about selling day sponsorships of grex, like the public radio stations
do, in exchange for which the sponsor could post a two-line notice in the motd
wishing someone a happy occasion? Kiwanis accepts 'happy dollars' - you pay
your dollar at lunch and tell people how happy you are that your grandchild
got all A's, or your favorite sports team won. (Of course people can already
do all this for free in the conferences, but the motd also reaches thousands
of Indian users who you might also want to impress).
What does it cost to run grex for one day - phone lines, rent,
utilities, insurance? I'd guess $10-15.
|
don
|
|
response 82 of 90:
|
Nov 13 03:34 UTC 1999 |
That sounds like a good idea. In fact, it's sorta similar to the motd
advertizement idea I brought up a while ago. The most common objection you'll
see on this (not one I necessarily advocate) is that it violates the spirit
of Grex being founded on principles that it should be free from stuff like
that and self-sufficient. The objection you'll hear from me is that I *HATE*
those annoying "thank you" messages on NPR.
|
aruba
|
|
response 83 of 90:
|
Nov 13 04:57 UTC 1999 |
Grex's operating expenses from 9/98 through 8/99 averaged $545.77 per month,
or $17.94 per day.
|
devnull
|
|
response 84 of 90:
|
Nov 13 23:55 UTC 1999 |
I wonder if there's some way of doing non-commercial sponsorships that would
be non-annoying...
|