|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 155 responses total. |
phenix
|
|
response 59 of 155:
| 
Nov 19 05:04 UTC 2001 |
really?
i might have to get a good car:)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 60 of 155:
|
Nov 21 22:24 UTC 2001 |
No, no. Clearly, he's saying he uses his car as bait to find marshmallow
animals. I'm not really sure where the sex comes into it.
|
phenix
|
|
response 61 of 155:
|
Nov 21 23:37 UTC 2001 |
ewwwwww, though how do you tell a used marshmellow animal?
|
senna
|
|
response 62 of 155:
|
Nov 22 05:09 UTC 2001 |
Marshmallow bestiality? I'm not sure how marshmallows would hold up to
serious thrusting, but to each their own. I hadn't realized you were that
far gone, though, greg.
|
phenix
|
|
response 63 of 155:
|
Nov 22 05:42 UTC 2001 |
i'm not far gone, i'm just wondering how a white and sticky thing
is inspected for white and sticky ness
|
lelande
|
|
response 64 of 155:
|
Nov 22 06:59 UTC 2001 |
peeps scare me.
|
vidar
|
|
response 65 of 155:
|
Nov 23 02:57 UTC 2001 |
I remember going to a peep murdering party at kami's house.
|
kewy
|
|
response 66 of 155:
|
Nov 24 15:51 UTC 2001 |
This is too Grex
|
phenix
|
|
response 67 of 155:
|
Nov 26 00:36 UTC 2001 |
what is too grex?
|
lelande
|
|
response 68 of 155:
|
Nov 26 17:43 UTC 2001 |
it's never too Grex for me.
|
phenix
|
|
response 69 of 155:
|
Nov 27 00:41 UTC 2001 |
i like grex
i has spiffy peps like anne and is not as innane as AOL
|
mooncat
|
|
response 70 of 155:
|
Nov 27 20:24 UTC 2001 |
<grins> Aww... thanks. I think...
|
phenix
|
|
response 71 of 155:
|
Nov 27 20:49 UTC 2001 |
you're welcome
i thnk
|
vidar
|
|
response 72 of 155:
|
Nov 30 03:42 UTC 2001 |
I'm getting along really well with the woman who sits next to me in
Finance class, I have not yet had the nerve to see if she's with
someone though.
|
phenix
|
|
response 73 of 155:
|
Nov 30 16:46 UTC 2001 |
go for it, you can do it
|
vidar
|
|
response 74 of 155:
|
Nov 30 22:02 UTC 2001 |
Thanks Greg.
|
phenix
|
|
response 75 of 155:
|
Dec 1 00:57 UTC 2001 |
np, i'm here to live thorugh others! woot
|
senna
|
|
response 76 of 155:
|
Dec 2 08:12 UTC 2001 |
What's the best strategy for trying to get together with someone? Do you find
out their status first, or do you just dive in for the early familiarity and
see what comes?
|
i
|
|
response 77 of 155:
|
Dec 2 14:57 UTC 2001 |
Dive in. Her status doesn't affect whether she'll be a good friend, i've
no surplus of those, and i don't want her for anything closer if she can't
be a good friend.
|
phenix
|
|
response 78 of 155:
|
Dec 2 18:41 UTC 2001 |
there yha go i.
perfect plan
|
senna
|
|
response 79 of 155:
|
Dec 3 03:26 UTC 2001 |
I'd be with you there. Otherwise, trying to be friendly is just a subterfuge,
and what's the point?
|
vidar
|
|
response 80 of 155:
|
Dec 4 00:15 UTC 2001 |
Get to know them through friendship first, then if you feel you've got
a chance, ask them on a date without using the word date. The worst
thing that will happen is that they'll say "no." Even if that's the
case, don't stop being friends just 'cause you can't get a date.
|
michaela
|
|
response 81 of 155:
|
Dec 4 01:46 UTC 2001 |
Bingo. :)
|
flem
|
|
response 82 of 155:
|
Dec 5 22:00 UTC 2001 |
All right, that pushes the button down far enough to get the 25 cent rant.
So, what the heck is it about the word "date" that is supposed to kill
friendships? Do people actually think that if they don't utter the magic
word, they won't be put in any embarrassing situations? Free Clue: It's
probably crossed her mind that you might be interested, and you'll look a hell
of a lot less stupid if you just up and ask her on a date than if you skulk
around the subject like a thirteen year old virgin. You aren't fooling
anyone, romeo.
|
michaela
|
|
response 83 of 155:
|
Dec 5 22:51 UTC 2001 |
Well, I think it's smoother to hear, "Would you like to go out for coffee
sometime?" than "Would you like to go on a date?" It's just a more casual
approach to earn the same thing.
|