You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   34-58   59-83   84-108   109-133   134-158   159-183   184-208 
 209-233   234-257         
 
Author Message
25 new of 257 responses total.
toking
response 59 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 17:45 UTC 1999

resp:56 well, when I was trying to install freebsd as a second OS I kept
selecting to have the boot manager thing installed, but I'd assumed that
with it being the only system on the HD I could get away with the second
option (standard boot record)
mwg
response 60 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 20:13 UTC 1999

Re#57:  If all else fails, you can boot with your original slackware setup
disks, mount your Linux partitions on the RamDisk file system, then re-run
lilo at the bash prompt, which should regenerate your LILO MBR.  (Unless
something has trashed /etc/lilo.conf.)  Then issue a shutdown command and
see what happens.
mwg
response 61 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 20:14 UTC 1999

Frack!  I meant #58.
dang
response 62 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 22:30 UTC 1999

resp:59 No, that won't work.  That only works if you have another 
intelligent boot loader (such as NT or OS2) already running that you a) 
don't want to trash and b) can configure to run FreeBSD.  If FreeBSD is 
alone, you have to install the bootloader from it, or nothing will boot.
jshafer
response 63 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 06:09 UTC 1999

Re: my floppy difficulties, back there somewhere, I got around
the problem by rebooting to Win95 (Actually whatever DOS comes
with Win95) and copying the files to the hard disk, then rebooting
in FreeBSD and mounting the DOS partition.

I just got a new external modem, and am now grexing from FreeBSD.
As soon as I figure out how to configure my X-windows display 
stuff so I can get a display bigger than 320x200, and figure out
which of the ports I installed was the POP3 client, I may be ready
to do away w/ M$ in general...
pfv
response 64 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 16:45 UTC 1999

        XF86Config is a LOT of fun.. Just remember to always leave the
        ^alt+[backspace] enabled ;-)
jshafer
response 65 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 19:33 UTC 1999

Thanks, Pete! 
dang
response 66 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 05:16 UTC 1999

And keep a backup copy of one that works... :)

Actually, I've found that xf86config (the program, not the file) works
pretty well.  If you want high color depth, tho, you're pretty much
stuck with a -bpp 32 somewhere on some command line.
pfv
response 67 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 06:22 UTC 1999

        Gods yes...

        Switching X versions  needed a new config - it said.. Thankfully,
        I'd saved the old one - in paranoid fashion.. the OLD one worked
        all the time.. the new one was an abomination!
gull
response 68 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 22:11 UTC 1999

Re #66:  Or do what I did.  Edit startx (it's just a shell script) to make
-bpp 32 the default.
toking
response 69 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 16:55 UTC 1999

O.K.  I finally got X working, but I'm stuck with some pretty crappy
color (just what does a color depth of 8 = in terms of number of
colors?) and suggestions on how to make that a little better? (I know
that in Windows I can set it to 16 bit

Ohh yeah....once you have FreeBSD installed is there some way to
reinstall the bootloader thing? (i'm stuck booting from floppy right
now...)
pfv
response 70 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 17:17 UTC 1999

        Use "XF86config" - 8 bit is.. 256 colors (guys?)

        Yeah, 16 or 24 bit make life tolerable..
toking
response 71 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 18 17:38 UTC 1999

I'm under the direct assumption that somewhere on my system there is a
program that I can run called XF86config, if so, where is it? do I run
it from inside X?                 ^---C?

ohh yeah...I've tried searching the web to no avail...anyone know where
I can find something about getting the MWave modem thats built into an
IBM ThinkPad 755CDV working under freebsd?
dang
response 72 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 00:19 UTC 1999

No, the program is xf86config, all lowercase.  The config file itself is
capitalized like this: XF86Config.  8 bit color is indeed 256 colors.
You can actually use more than 256 colors, but only 256 at one time.  If
you have 8 bit color, you usually get bizarre color changes when you
select programs like netscape, because they load thier own colormap.  If
you are using startx to start X, then you can do this:
startx -- -bpp n
where n is one of 8, 16, 24, or 32.  That coresponds to 256 colors, High
Color, and True Color (both the last two) on Windows.  Its 256, 65,536,
16 million, and 4e9 colors.   If you use xdm to start X, you will need
to edit it's config files and add a "-bpp n" to the line that has the X
server listed.  

I know of no way to install the bootloader in FreeBSD other than by
installing.  There probably is such a way, but I've never needed it. 
Try http://www.freebsd.org which is a pretty good web site.
eprom
response 73 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 02:06 UTC 1999

hmm..the bootloader thingy?  try /stand/sysinstall as root
then go to the post-config menu..then to fdisk then type "q" to quit
that should get you to the bootload thingy option...then go back to fdisk
and type "w" for write changes....theres probillly a more simple way
but i dunno know how....
pfv
response 74 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 17:28 UTC 1999

        Hmm.. I find:

        /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86Setup

        No "xf[86config]" of any type.. We're heading into system
        differences, I suspect. Sorry about misleading about, I'd have
        SWORN I ran that..
dang
response 75 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 20 22:17 UTC 1999

I have /usr/X11R6/bin/xf86config, which is a standard part of XFree86. 
If you installed X yourself, you didn't install the Xcfg.tgz package,
which is very suprising.  It's listed as needed.  If it came that way
from your distribution, that's again surprising.  I'd switch
distributions.  There is a program called Xconfigurator which runs a
stripped down X server and gives you a nice windows configuration
program.  You might try that.  I don't really like it, tho.
pfv
response 76 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 21 12:17 UTC 1999

        Yeppers, I suspect the Xconfigurator is what I've been using
        of late..Either I went too far in "cleaning house", or RedHat-
        stuff took a few liberties..

jshafer
response 77 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 21 12:46 UTC 1999

Anyone here used Accelerated X?  XFree86 doesn't support my i740
AGP video card, & i'm not sure if there's anything I can do to
make it work or not.  I haven't done too much mucking around with
it, but what I have done leads me to think that paying $75 for a
product that _should_ work right out of the box might be worthwhile.
toking
response 78 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 22 16:40 UTC 1999

(found xf86config, didn' do me too much good, so I think I"ll just have
to live with 8bpp)
dang
response 79 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 19:31 UTC 1999

(resp:78 if you need more than 8 bpp, you need a command line option on 
the command line that starts the actual X server.  If you are using 
startx, then try "startx -- -bpp 32" which will start with 32 bpp.  
Don't forget the "--", which signals startx that the following options 
are for X rather than xinit.  If you use xdm, then you need to edit 
/etc/X/xdm/Xservers and add " -bpp 32" to the end of the line containing 
/usr/X11R6/bin/X.)

resp:77  I use Accelerate X for my Diamond Monster Fusion.  It's a brand 
new alpha server.  However, until recently, I couldn't use Accelerated X 
because there wasn't a server.  There is a way around it.  Look here: 
http://www.uno.edu/~adamico/banshee/
jshafer
response 80 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 12:23 UTC 1999

Hmm.  Not sure how useful that will be, as I'm not using a banshee or 
Linux, but I'll check it out in more detail later...  Thanks.
toking
response 81 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 16:53 UTC 1999

if you read the page a little more it talks about how it could be useful
on something that's not a banshee 
dang
response 82 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 26 16:34 UTC 1999

Exactly.  It should work exactly the same on any modern graphics card. 
I had it running on my banshee for several months, and it's okay.  No
acceleration, so it's a bit slow, but otherwise okay.
gull
response 83 of 257: Mark Unseen   Feb 28 01:49 UTC 1999

What's the point of 32-bit color?  I was under the impression (perhaps
mistaken) that 24-bit color already could generate more shades than the
human eye could discern.  Is 32-bit color just a sop to the 'more is better'
crowd?
 0-24   25-49   34-58   59-83   84-108   109-133   134-158   159-183   184-208 
 209-233   234-257         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss