|
Grex > Oldcoop > #370: Nominations for the 2007 Grex Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 236 responses total. |
kingjon
|
|
response 57 of 236:
| 
Nov 16 02:17 UTC 2006 |
#55: As I say in #54, the "part" command -- built into Picospan, mind -- tells
you about "participants" in a conference, i.e. those who have posted responses.
|
steve
|
|
response 58 of 236:
|
Nov 16 03:18 UTC 2006 |
I accept the nomination to run for the board.
I nominate Glenda Andre'.
|
steve
|
|
response 59 of 236:
|
Nov 16 03:21 UTC 2006 |
I nominate Marcus Watts.
|
mdw
|
|
response 60 of 236:
|
Nov 16 03:34 UTC 2006 |
I accept.
|
glenda
|
|
response 61 of 236:
|
Nov 16 04:11 UTC 2006 |
I accept.
|
keesan
|
|
response 62 of 236:
|
Nov 16 04:52 UTC 2006 |
I second the last two nominations. Don't you need to be seconded before you
can accept?
|
tod
|
|
response 63 of 236:
|
Nov 16 06:40 UTC 2006 |
i nominate keesan and kingjon
|
nharmon
|
|
response 64 of 236:
|
Nov 16 13:56 UTC 2006 |
I nominate Dick Devos.
|
keesan
|
|
response 65 of 236:
|
Nov 16 16:11 UTC 2006 |
It is too late to nominate us and besides we were both already nominated and
declined. Or maybe your 1:40 posting reflects Ann Arbor and not your local
time. Thanks anyway. My seconding was 8 minutes before the deadline.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 66 of 236:
|
Nov 16 16:31 UTC 2006 |
I nominate John Kerry.
|
jep
|
|
response 67 of 236:
|
Nov 16 19:57 UTC 2006 |
You don't need to be nominated or seconded to run for the Board of
Cyberspace. You merely need to indicate you are willing to run.
|
tod
|
|
response 68 of 236:
|
Nov 16 21:52 UTC 2006 |
re #64
I'm in Seattle so yea..I posted it 3 hours previous to the timestamp.
|
other
|
|
response 69 of 236:
|
Nov 17 06:41 UTC 2006 |
I'm surprised I don't show up as a participant, but that may be because
I only use the web interface for conferencing. In any case, I
appreciate the nomination, but I'm inclined to decline.
|
spooked
|
|
response 70 of 236:
|
Nov 17 11:08 UTC 2006 |
The part command is not working correctly.
|
spooked
|
|
response 71 of 236:
|
Nov 17 11:09 UTC 2006 |
e.g. I'm not a participant (still).
|
naftee
|
|
response 72 of 236:
|
Nov 18 00:47 UTC 2006 |
i nominate nate harmon
|
nharmon
|
|
response 73 of 236:
|
Nov 18 14:45 UTC 2006 |
Thanks Brett, but I have already declined.
|
i
|
|
response 74 of 236:
|
Nov 19 04:42 UTC 2006 |
Re: #40,
Thank you, but i'm afraid that i've already got more commitments than i
can pay proper attention to, and so must decline.
|
remmers
|
|
response 75 of 236:
|
Nov 27 15:49 UTC 2006 |
Here's the list of nominees at this time. Those who've accepted are
marked with a *, and I've included their full names as well. I haven't
listed those who explicitly declined. People have through November 30
(EST) to accept their nominations. Voting begins on December 1.
remmers
* scholar David Hoffman
janc
* tod Todd Plesco
walkman
mary
* steve Steve Andre
jp2
* cross Dan Cross
* cmcgee Colleen McGee
jvmv
herasleftnut
jared
eskarina
srw
* glenda Glenda Andre
* mdw Marcus Watts
|
remmers
|
|
response 76 of 236:
|
Nov 27 15:54 UTC 2006 |
I'll add that I'm a bit on the fence about accepting. In the event that I
do accept, since I am also voteadm -- the way that's been handled in the
past is to have a second person verify the ballot count.
Also, I'll add my voice to those endorsing Jan Wolter. I hope he accepts.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 77 of 236:
|
Nov 27 18:23 UTC 2006 |
So do I!
|
naftee
|
|
response 78 of 236:
|
Nov 28 00:23 UTC 2006 |
i don't think herasfleftnut will win this one :(
|
denise
|
|
response 79 of 236:
|
Nov 28 05:21 UTC 2006 |
I hope Mary will consider accepting, too. Though I know I can't vote for
anyone...
|
tod
|
|
response 80 of 236:
|
Nov 29 20:32 UTC 2006 |
Unfortunately, I have to withdraw my acceptance. Sorry.
|
remmers
|
|
response 81 of 236:
|
Nov 29 22:30 UTC 2006 |
After conducting some interior dialog with myself, I've decided to accept
my nomination.
|