|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 17 new of 73 responses total. |
eeyore
|
|
response 57 of 73:
| 
Jan 7 04:03 UTC 2002 |
I'm honest enough to admit that I am the worst kind of flirt at
times....mostly with guys (although I do have my moments with women), and
while it's sometimes mild flirting, it's not always. But the people that I
do massive flirting with are people that I'm comfortable with, and that know
me well enough to flirt massively back, while knowing that it's all in fun
and we'll never end up in bed. This does include having my hands on people,
although usually in the manner of a back rub, or hugs, or laying my head on
their shoulder or something. The reality is, I'm a very tactile person. I
*LIKE* having my hands on people/things. But if I'm not comfortable around
you, then my hands aren't on you. And I'm usually not comfortable around
people that I'd like to get into bed....too nervous. :)
(for those of you who have dealt with me in the touchyfeelyflirt mode, you
can agree or disagree with me as you see fit....I'm just seeing it from my
angle. :)
|
oval
|
|
response 58 of 73:
|
Jan 8 15:45 UTC 2002 |
it could be my turn to say something. or not. i feel like maybe it is.
although i can't figure out what to say. <shrugs>
|
eeyore
|
|
response 59 of 73:
|
Jan 8 17:08 UTC 2002 |
Tag, Youre it! :)
|
oval
|
|
response 60 of 73:
|
Jan 8 21:33 UTC 2002 |
crap.
|
phenix
|
|
response 61 of 73:
|
Jan 8 22:58 UTC 2002 |
heh. i wanna tag oval:)
|
sj2
|
|
response 62 of 73:
|
Mar 7 08:38 UTC 2002 |
I don't have an issue with jealousy. I think its what you and your
partner are comfortable with. I am ok with monogamy. Polygamy seems way
too complicated to be fun. Managing emotions between two people is
enough for a lifetime, i guess.
|
ssjgoten
|
|
response 63 of 73:
|
Oct 23 22:36 UTC 2002 |
well i am new to this bbs, but if you want my opinion ,i think manogamy is
better because then you can have that one person and you dont have to worry
about pleasing so many people, but non-manogamous relationships you dont have
to worry about just one person, if you piss one person off, there's allways
someone else, just a thought
Goten Sayain
email me at: ssjgoten@cyberspace.org
|
jazz
|
|
response 64 of 73:
|
Oct 24 16:52 UTC 2002 |
Huh?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 65 of 73:
|
Oct 24 22:24 UTC 2002 |
Manogamy. You know, the cultural practice of marrying one's hand. It keeps
you from having to worry about pleasing so many people.
|
michaela
|
|
response 66 of 73:
|
Oct 25 03:00 UTC 2002 |
If you're ambidextrous, is it considered polygamy?
|
jazz
|
|
response 67 of 73:
|
Oct 25 13:21 UTC 2002 |
Is the masturbation scene in American Pie considered "missockany"?
|
phenix
|
|
response 68 of 73:
|
Oct 25 18:53 UTC 2002 |
oodfayohile
|
romie
|
|
response 69 of 73:
|
Feb 15 17:31 UTC 2003 |
no comment
|
otter
|
|
response 70 of 73:
|
Feb 16 17:45 UTC 2003 |
resp:62
Actually, polyamory (to be successful) requires that people communicate
very openly and honestly regarding feelings, expectations, limitations,
and a thousand other things. Open communication makes emotional issues
infinitely more "manageable", no matter how many people are involved.
When there are just two, it becomes far too easy to let communication
lapse in favor of assumption. *That's* where I've seen relationships
get into serious trouble.
|
void
|
|
response 71 of 73:
|
Mar 1 07:17 UTC 2003 |
I have yet to see any polyamorous relationship work out happily for
everyone involved.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 72 of 73:
|
Mar 2 00:52 UTC 2003 |
I have seen one do it. Not without some apparent rough spots, but they've
weathered them so far as far as I can tell.
|
jazz
|
|
response 73 of 73:
|
Mar 2 22:12 UTC 2003 |
The key word, I guess, being "everyone". I've seen stable polygamous
relationships work out, but never completely open polyamory without a stable
couple or triad at the centre.
|