You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   32-56   57-62       
 
Author Message
6 new of 62 responses total.
ea
response 57 of 62: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 19:31 UTC 2000

I was rather disappointed to find that shakeyjake.com is not the web 
site of Shakey Jake, but some random New Englander.
brighn
response 58 of 62: Mark Unseen   Oct 30 19:47 UTC 2000

Update:
Stabenow -- 16.312 (janc, bruin, fitz, swa, gelinas)
Abraham -- 5
Shakey Jake -- 2.688 (swa)
No candidate -- 1
(refer to 50 for previous count)
 
BTW, I saw recently that Debbie and Spence are tied. Maybe she has a chance
after all.
swa
response 59 of 62: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 05:43 UTC 2000

Re 58: Um, I don't think I get three votes all by my lil' old self, 
flattered though I may be...
brighn
response 60 of 62: Mark Unseen   Oct 31 06:05 UTC 2000

no, I'm just not repeating earlier votes. That's why I refer to the earlier
posts. I give the cumulative numbers and the handles of people who've voted
since the last update. =}
swa
response 61 of 62: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 01:11 UTC 2000

Right.  Sorry.  You'd think I'd've noticed that, seeing as the numbers 
in the Stabenow column also didn't match up.  But all numbers greater 
than, say, three tend to look more or less the same to me, really...
brighn
response 62 of 62: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 03:39 UTC 2000

While the outcome was not as, well, dramatic as Grex's vote, Stabenow
surprised me by actually pulling off the Senate run. Congrats, Debbie. =}
(Even though the only time I wrote you was to criticize you ;} )
 0-24   25-49   32-56   57-62       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss