You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   31-55   56-80   81-99      
 
Author Message
25 new of 99 responses total.
raven
response 56 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 05:30 UTC 2001

re #54 Did I say we didn't need rules Russ, I did not.  What I suggested
was that the current rules such as no fm transmiters can be liscensed
under 100 watts (the elimination of the class d liscense) and the 4,000
dollar cost of a liscense to broadcast bias the process towards corporate
and NPR style radio stations at the expense of smaller more diverse radio
stations.  I think this is a bad outcome and I would like to see it changed.

Nowhere did I say anything such as "smash the state dude," if you thought
that's what I was implying then that's all on you. :-)
rcurl
response 57 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 06:24 UTC 2001

Correction: stations are spaced at 0.2 Mhz in the FM band (at odd
decimals.. x.1, x.3, etc). This does not change any of the above
discussion to any significant degree. 
raven
response 58 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 06:29 UTC 2001

re #57 true enough but it can fun to nitpick sometimes.
rcurl
response 59 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 06:37 UTC 2001

(Especially to pick one's own nits.....)
danr
response 60 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 11:57 UTC 2001

If someone can't come up with $4,000 for a broadcast license, how are 
they going to come up with the money to buy equipment and run a 
station? As I said earlier, I'm all for micropower stations, but the 
realities of setting up and running one is going to limit the diversity 
you seek. Whether you're in it for the music or for advancing a 
particular politicial cuase, you'll get much more bang for your buck by 
using a print media or setting up an Internet radio station.
tsty
response 61 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 13:42 UTC 2001

$4000 will buy a lot of radio shack stuff ... ham fests and other
technically oriented 'gatherings' and a few books (gasp! read!) on
antenna theory ....viola! $3500 left over for budweiser!
raven
response 62 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 15:31 UTC 2001

re#61 Thanks tsty that's that's the gist of what I was about to say.
danr
response 63 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 16:01 UTC 2001

You guys are really underestimating the time and money it will take to 
run such an operation. Sure, you can buy cheap stuff at hamfests, but 
what are you going to do when it breaks? 

Where are you going to put the antenna? Chances are you're going to 
have to pay some rent for that space.

Take a look at how much it costs us to run Grex. You better plan on at 
least that much to run a radio station.
danr
response 64 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 17:30 UTC 2001

Here's what Nick Farr, General Manager of WCBN, had to say:

"Our budget is about $75,000; but that doesn't include rent or 
utilities for our facility, transmitter or antenna, *or* staff 
salaries. (Our staff is entirely student based, the exec staff 
positions get a small stipend that covers books for the term.)

"Usually, a MINIMUM station budget is about $250-500,000, assuming that 
the DJ staff is volunteer and there are three full-time positions 
(General Manager, Program/Music Director and Chief Engineer). The 
smallest budget for a completely independent station, that we've seen, 
is $50,000 for a homebrew community radio station in Ohio run out of 
some guy's barn. Their studios, transmitter, and antenna are on the 
same small piece of farmland. His startup costs were in the $100,000 
range.

"Commercial stations usually run budgets at minimum of $1,000,000. "
flem
response 65 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 20:05 UTC 2001

re 41:  Are you *crazy*?  What's wrong with you?!!?!

I mean, Budweiser?!  Good God, man, you're sick.  Sick!
danr
response 66 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 16 23:03 UTC 2001

Hey...remember it's tsty who posted that. :)
raven
response 67 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 17 08:00 UTC 2001

re #64 I suspect Stephen Dunifers budget for Radio Free Berkeley in a year is
closer to 500 than 500,000.  He runs it out of a backpack and manages to
run a very tight on frequncy station at the same time being a former radio
engineer.  You have just swallowed corporate line hook line and sinker Dan.
scott
response 68 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 17 11:20 UTC 2001

If you only want to run a few watts then you can stick an antenna out your
window.  You only need a tower on some farmland if you are planning on pumping
thousands of watts into the air.

One full watt is pretty powerful, actually.  At work we've used radio data
terminals which put out 1 watt around 400MHz or so, and that signal can go
a mile or two.  At lower frequencies you can send a couple of watts quite a
ways (hand-held CB radios).
n8nxf
response 69 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 17 11:42 UTC 2001

Just put a good, tight, filter on the output.  Mark From Michigan runs
a watt or more out of his junk yard out there on Dexter Pinckney and the
thing splatters all over the FM band!  He needs a simple cavity to clean
that mess up.  (He could use the barrel of a cannon or something.)
gull
response 70 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 17 12:24 UTC 2001

One of the (commercial) AM stations in Houghton is (in)famous for 
pushing their transmitter a bit too hard.  Every time there's a voice 
peak, it splatters, and you can hear buckshot all up and down the band.
danr
response 71 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 17 15:56 UTC 2001

WCBN is a corporation?  When did that happen? 

I'm speaking both from my experience as an engineer, businessperson, 
and Grex board member--not as a  corporate lackey. The rule of thumb in 
all those ventures is that it always costs more than you think it will. 
And I've yet to run into a situation where that rule of thumb was 
broken.

All I can say, raven, is go for it. If you think you can do it on the 
cheap, and have it make an impact, be my guest.
raven
response 72 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 00:09 UTC 2001

Dan thanks to attitudes like yoursI can't for it without being criminal.
That is really my main point, IF a micro power boradcaster takes the
responsability to broadcast with a clean transmiter why should they
be criminalized?
rcurl
response 73 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 05:34 UTC 2001

They won't be, if they get a license (but I presume you mean,
without a license). Well, what right do you have to occupy that
frequency by yourself when others might want to use it? Someone
must judge your right compared to that of others, which is what
licensing is. Also, if you use it unlicensed, what basis do you
have for 'complaining' if others used the same frequency?
goose
response 74 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 05:43 UTC 2001

RE#69 -- does he actually transmit?  I've listened a bit for that station,
but never heard anything.  If I remember he's awfully close to WUOM, bot in
frequency and in location.
scott
response 75 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 11:29 UTC 2001

Re 73:  But what if there seems to be plenty of frequencies available, but
no way (or even an application process) to get a license to use them?  In the
last couple of years the FCC was about to allow micropower licenses, but a
heavy lobbying effort by the National Association of Broadcasters (including
NPR, which is disappointing) killed it.
n8nxf
response 76 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 12:06 UTC 2001

RE#74-- Indeed he does.  Perhaps not all the time but I've listened in several
times.  He must have some sort of robot playing music and adds on it.  I've
heard spots for Mill Creek Sporting Goods, a gun show at the Saline Fair
Grounds, and a spot for that card store behind the Fox Village theater.  The
last time I picked it up I was just scanning the FM band in the basement of
my house, located about two miles, as the crow flies, from his surplus museum.
To top it off, it was going even though he's in jail.  (As do the Friday
meetings.)
danr
response 77 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 12:24 UTC 2001

re #72: I am FOR micropower radio stations. I want people to be able to 
get licenses to run them. BUT, as Rane points out, licensing is 
essential. All I can say is to keep lobbying your representatives and 
senators and get them to pass a law forcing the FCC to allow them.
rcurl
response 78 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 14:50 UTC 2001

Are the objections of NPR, NAB or anyone else easily available on the
web? I've heard that they objected, but have not heard their reasons.
gull
response 79 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 15:03 UTC 2001

They objected on the grounds that it would create too much interference 
for people trying to listen to their stations, basically.
rcurl
response 80 of 99: Mark Unseen   Apr 18 15:14 UTC 2001

I'd like to see the details of the analysis that demonstrates that. 
If there are open channels at 0.2 Mhz intervals, how does the interference
occur if those channels are used for minipower stations?
 0-24   25-49   31-55   56-80   81-99      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss