You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   30-54   55-79   80-104   105-129   130-154   155-179   180-204 
 205-229   230-254   255-279   280-304   305-323      
 
Author Message
25 new of 323 responses total.
gull
response 55 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 14:41 UTC 2004

I figure if you investigate someone for seven years with an unlimited
budget, and the worst you can come up with is a blow job, that's gotta
be a pretty clean administration.
twenex
response 56 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 14:44 UTC 2004

Snicker.
mcnally
response 57 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 16:21 UTC 2004

  re #55:  or more likely that the rest of the dirt they could dig up
  was embarrassing to *both* sides.
tod
response 58 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 17:08 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

klg
response 59 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 19:54 UTC 2004

Ringo, perhaps.  But those who actually know Kenneth Starr state that 
he is an immensely good and decent person.
tod
response 60 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 20:51 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

bru
response 61 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 22:46 UTC 2004

it also doesn't excuse the lengths the Clinton Administration went to hide
things that were of no danger to it.
tod
response 62 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 23:08 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

marcvh
response 63 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 23:20 UTC 2004

The Bush Administration, by contrast, is a paragon of transparency who
is always happy to share information.
tod
response 64 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 23:26 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 65 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 00:07 UTC 2004

What did the Clinton Administration hide (especially things more egregious
than like Cheney's energy advisory panel)? 
tod
response 66 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 00:09 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 67 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 00:19 UTC 2004

That would raise a stink.
jor
response 68 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 01:40 UTC 2004

        (rim shot for tod)
bru
response 69 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 08:04 UTC 2004

did I say the Bush administration was perfect?

where were the first ladies papers?  If they had been available the first week
it would have saved the government a load of money, but she lost them for over
2 years.

If you are being investigated, and you lose or hide needed documents, it is
going to caus ethe investigator to dig deeper.
rcurl
response 70 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 15:46 UTC 2004

You never lose/misplace anything? 
mcnally
response 71 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 16:09 UTC 2004

  re #70:  I lose things all the time, but when I do it's pretty clear I
  had no incentive to do so..  So far I've never "lost" documents that had
  been subpoenaed in an investigation.  Nor do I have a staff who can be
  tasked with finding stuff for me.
tod
response 72 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 16:12 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 73 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 17:44 UTC 2004

I hope everyone would agree that someone losing something for which they
might have an incentive to lose is not necessary guility of doing so
deliberately. 
tod
response 74 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jun 30 18:03 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

richard
response 75 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 09:05 UTC 2004

This is the MOVIES item guys.   Movies movies and more movies.  What movies
have you seen?  
klg
response 76 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 10:29 UTC 2004

"Not necessarily" but quite coincindentally.
gregb
response 77 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 17:35 UTC 2004

Thank you, Richard.

I saw Hellboy at the dollar theater.  I've never read the comics, but I
enjoyed it.  I didn't know Ron Pearlman was the star.  Seems like the
only time I see him is when he's covered in makeup.
jvmv
response 78 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 2 06:27 UTC 2004

     I have just watched again "Underneath", which dates
     from 1995. The direction is Okay but a little rough
     on the style. Trying to be clever Soderbergh didn't
     get great ideas to work out. "Underneath" is interesting
     to watch. As a movie itself, it's more than a experience.

mooncat
response 79 of 323: Mark Unseen   Jul 4 01:51 UTC 2004

I thought that Hellboy was entertaining. Okay, a bit predictable in 
spots, but the character of Hellboy was fun. The rest of the cast was 
all right, the fish-man (whose name is excaping me) was one of my 
favorites.

Saw Harry Potter: Prizoner of Azkhaban on IMAX a few weeks ago. I 
don't think that it was much better than non-IMAX, though maybe the 
IMAX experience would have been better if we (all 10 of us who went) 
were a few rows back and more to the center.

I do have to highly recommend the "Blue Collar Comedy Tour" with Jeff 
Foxworthy, Bill Engval, Larry the Cable guy and (my favorite) Ron 
White. Okay, so the humor is a bit low brow, but it never fails to 
make me laugh... a lot.
 0-24   25-49   30-54   55-79   80-104   105-129   130-154   155-179   180-204 
 205-229   230-254   255-279   280-304   305-323      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss