You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   29-53   54-78   79-103   104-119     
 
Author Message
25 new of 119 responses total.
marcvh
response 54 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 19:03 UTC 2006

I think that an important part of encouraging others to follow MLK's example
is to talk about his situation and compare it to the present.  For example,
MLK was persecuted by the federal government; they did (among other things)
illegal wiretaps of him and people associated with him.  That means speaking
out against such things today is a vital part of honoring his legacy.
tod
response 55 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 19:11 UTC 2006

Let's join hands and sing Onward Christian Soldiers.
klg
response 56 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:11 UTC 2006

vnaheyngingen is more interested, apparently, in using MLK day to bash 
the President than to honor the Reverend King.  And judging by the Demo 
newswhores, he's not alone in that regard.
bhelliom
response 57 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:19 UTC 2006

Jesus, klg.  Can you refrain from posting complete bullshit for five
minutes?
marcvh
response 58 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:21 UTC 2006

Yes, let's be sure that on MLK's day we don't do or say anything that
might offend MLK's enemies.  What a bunch of PC crap.
twenex
response 59 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:23 UTC 2006

Yeah. And so uncharacteristically klg, too. Obviously klg will post any old
BS just to disagree with the satanic liberals on grex. In England we have a
word for that kind of person, and that word is "arsehole".
cyklone
response 60 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:43 UTC 2006

The correct word is "troll." 
twenex
response 61 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:49 UTC 2006

Not all arseholes are trolls, but all trolls are arseholes, so my terminology
was correct.
bru
response 62 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 21:07 UTC 2006

twenex is a troll.
jadecat
response 63 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 21:48 UTC 2006

He's from Michigan?
scholar
response 64 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 23:13 UTC 2006

I'm stunningly handsome.
cross
response 65 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 23:57 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

twenex
response 66 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 00:01 UTC 2006

It'll cost ya!
bru
response 67 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 06:56 UTC 2006

now we have independent news crews going to sites and asking to see our 
guns.  What kind of idiot reporter does that?
tod
response 68 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 07:20 UTC 2006

The kind that exploits lawlessness.
richard
response 69 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 19:26 UTC 2006

re #67 Thats because it is news to the locals when companies on their 
own bring what is in essence a private "armed militia" into their 
area.  Lets see how you'd feel if there was devastation up in Michigan, 
and they started bringing truckloads of questionable sorts up there 
from Louisiana armed to the teeth.  Every guy who never got in the 
army, or just wanted to be able to use his gun, coming up and acting 
like a posse.
nharmon
response 70 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 19:52 UTC 2006

Would Nagin feel more comfortable if there were more "chocolate" private
police down there?
richard
response 71 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 19:54 UTC 2006

re #70 I think nharmon's use of the word "chocolate" in that context is 
fairly obviously racial.  Nagin simply wants NO private militias 
whatsoever.
nharmon
response 72 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 21:00 UTC 2006

Do you think Mayor Nagin's use of the word "chocolate" in the context by
which he used it was fairly obviously racial?
richard
response 73 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 21:21 UTC 2006

re #72 possibly, I wasn't defending his choice of words
bru
response 74 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 08:57 UTC 2006

first of all, what makes you think we are questionable sorts?
second, most of these people are black coming from Michigan.
third, Nagin as far as I know has not come out against any security.
fourth, most of us are unarmed at this point because of FEMA.
tod
response 75 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 04:42 UTC 2006

HARD TARGET
richard
response 76 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 00:49 UTC 2006

re #74 well wouldn't you consider people hired for armed jobs without 
extensive background/criminal checks and reference checks to 
be "questionable"?  It sounds like they were just looking for people 
who either had guns legally, or were able to get them, and who could go 
out of state and work those long hours.  Beyond that, how picky were 
they?  Maybe you yourself aren't questionable, but can you honestly say 
that some of the other people you're working with who came down there 
aren't questionable?
gull
response 77 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 02:00 UTC 2006

Re resp:47: I think Nagin's "Chocolate City" comment was stupid and 
irresponsible.  I also think I understand what he was getting at, 
though.  Some of the decisions that have been made about what 
neighborhoods will be allowed to rebuild look suspiciously like 
someone's trying to make New Orleans into a theme park for rich white 
people.  I think he was trying to reassure people that everyone else is 
welcome back, too. 
 
nharmon
response 78 of 119: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 02:17 UTC 2006

Good call David.
 0-24   25-49   29-53   54-78   79-103   104-119     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss