|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 680 responses total. |
llanarth
|
|
response 50 of 680:
| 
Sep 15 20:55 UTC 1996 |
If we consider them silly.. then why would we need them to survive?
|
achilles
|
|
response 51 of 680:
|
Sep 16 05:38 UTC 1996 |
Who deems what is silly and what is not?
|
unknown
|
|
response 52 of 680:
|
Sep 17 21:02 UTC 1996 |
Do you deem that this item is silly?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 53 of 680:
|
Sep 19 01:07 UTC 1996 |
Doesn't "deem" sound really funny if you say if often enough?
(deem deem deem deem deem deem demm demm deem)
|
scott
|
|
response 54 of 680:
|
Sep 19 11:04 UTC 1996 |
Don't you agree that "subtle" is even funnier under the same conditions?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 55 of 680:
|
Sep 20 01:49 UTC 1996 |
Shouldn't "worm" and "juxtapose" also count?
|
unknown
|
|
response 56 of 680:
|
Sep 22 18:50 UTC 1996 |
Do you think we should add warm to that list?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 57 of 680:
|
Sep 23 18:42 UTC 1996 |
Do you think I could get a beer? Could I get more confuzzled than I am now?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 58 of 680:
|
Sep 23 23:22 UTC 1996 |
Would a beer help you reach that state of confuzzlement? If so, does anyone
have an antidote?
|
llanarth
|
|
response 59 of 680:
|
Sep 24 19:56 UTC 1996 |
Do you understand what you just asked?
|
juliette
|
|
response 60 of 680:
|
Sep 28 02:12 UTC 1996 |
Fi you see the word "bus" a lot of times in a row it looks really odd...like
it's spelled incorrectly
|
orinoco
|
|
response 61 of 680:
|
Sep 28 15:29 UTC 1996 |
wouldn't this be an oppoirtune moment to note that *someone* isn't reading
the rules?
|
juliette
|
|
response 62 of 680:
|
Sep 28 20:58 UTC 1996 |
rules?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 63 of 680:
|
Sep 29 14:10 UTC 1996 |
have you noticed a pattern in these responses? particularly in the
punctuation that every sentence ends in? haven't you wondered why that might
be?
|
unknown
|
|
response 64 of 680:
|
Sep 29 18:17 UTC 1996 |
Is the ? the punctuation that you are refering to?
|
juliette
|
|
response 65 of 680:
|
Sep 29 19:19 UTC 1996 |
ahh...so the ? is the important part of every response here?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 66 of 680:
|
Sep 29 20:53 UTC 1996 |
would it be reasonable to assume that you know the answer to that one?
|
llanarth
|
|
response 67 of 680:
|
Sep 30 14:39 UTC 1996 |
BUt..do you know the answer to taht one, orinoco?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 68 of 680:
|
Sep 30 21:13 UTC 1996 |
Why should I tell you?
|
anne
|
|
response 69 of 680:
|
Oct 1 19:30 UTC 1996 |
Would you tell if she asked nicely?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 70 of 680:
|
Oct 4 19:33 UTC 1996 |
Are you accusing me of discriminating against the niceness-challenged?
|
juliette
|
|
response 71 of 680:
|
Oct 5 20:51 UTC 1996 |
If the ?is then important part of the reponse, then I would think that the
question orinoco asked would be answered in this response, maybe?
Am I getting the hang of this yet?
|
zabito
|
|
response 72 of 680:
|
Oct 7 19:55 UTC 1996 |
well,this is the iq game room............or room something.......?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 73 of 680:
|
Oct 7 21:25 UTC 1996 |
do you realize, zabito, that you can't just put a question mark on teh end
of statement and call it a question?
|
gulliver
|
|
response 74 of 680:
|
Oct 11 03:54 UTC 1996 |
Can't any statement of information be construed as a question in the sense
that the speaker is asking for the information to be verified?
|