You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-283        
 
Author Message
25 new of 283 responses total.
drew
response 50 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 11 02:36 UTC 1997

Why is it necessary to have 30 sendmail processes, let alone 200(!) to send
out the mail? Can't a single process be made to handle this task?
i
response 51 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 11 13:22 UTC 1997

The process isn't very bright or energetic, so plenty of 'em are needed 
to properly staff the post office.  200 is way too many, though, and 
problems result.
janc
response 52 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 11 22:51 UTC 1997

I don't really know much about sendmail.  But I think that to send a piece
of mail, you open a connection to the destination machine, and start a
conversation.  You spend a significant amount of the time waiting for the
other machine to respond, and doing nothing.  So there is no real problem
doing many at the same time.  If you only did one at a time you'd accumulate
a huge backlog, but if you got them all delivered, you'd still have done just
as much total work as if you tried to do them all at once.  So I don't think
having too many sendmail processes running is the problem.  The problem is
that we have too much mail to send.
tsty
response 53 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 02:27 UTC 1997

<<maybe too many of those win95 encapsulated thingies?>>
arthurp
response 54 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 04:55 UTC 1997

I think maybe the problem with 200 sendmails is all that stuff they each take
a chunk of while sitting there.  Check vmstat.  Swapping is a real performance
drag.

When I logged in tonight, I got a usage error message from fortune.  Huh?
srw
response 55 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 05:37 UTC 1997

Backtalk users will notice a new problem. The buttons are not loading. 
The graphics come from the HVCN server, and it has gone down.
Sorry about that, but since we do not have 24 hour access to it, we
will have to wait until monday (or possibly tuesday) to get it rebooted.
orinoco
response 56 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 20:16 UTC 1997

Yet Another Clueless Question:
What is it about the HVCN server that lets them carry images when we can't.
I was under the impression that they were kinda' vaguely similar to grex...
danr
response 57 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 22:16 UTC 1997

Au contraire. The only thing the HVCN server is currently doing is ser-
ving web pages for a number of non-profits here in Washtenaw County. It
doesn't have any dial-ins, nor does it have individual accounts.  The 
result is that it's much less busy than Grex is.
dpc
response 58 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 23:35 UTC 1997

HVCN also had a bunch of Web-based conferences a while ago.  Have
they removed them?
valerie
response 59 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 02:46 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

scg
response 60 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 03:25 UTC 1997

The HVCN server has much better network connectivity than Grex does.  Grex
is sitting on a very overloaded 28,800 modem, while HVCN is on Washtenaw
County's ethernet.  There's no technical reason making it impossible for Grex
to have graphics, but with a net link like Grex's, as overloaded as Grex's,
we don't have bandwidth to spare, and graphics take up a lot of bandwidth.
That is a problem HVCN does not have.
laz
response 61 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 07:08 UTC 1997

While many vendors are happy withoffering you character based
emulation,alternatives like graphic emulators using X hich reduces one
snvestments
valerie
response 62 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 15:27 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

e4808mc
response 63 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 18:24 UTC 1997

Just what is the computer doing when you "resynch the password files"?
other
response 64 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 19:59 UTC 1997

yeah, what does that mean?
comparing two files to make sure they have the same content?
valerie
response 65 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 20:12 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

srw
response 66 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 18:39 UTC 1997

HVCN is now back up. It had lost power, and had not recovered 
automatically. Unfortunately, I had to wait until Tuesday morning before 
I get in to reboot it. That is because it lives in the offices of the 
Washtenaw County IS department, and their offices were closed Monday for  
Columbus Day.

This should restore the missing graphics on Grex's website, Backtalk 
buttons, grexwalk and dungeon tour sites.

The answers others gave about HVCN are all correct. I should point out 
that HVCN does have *conferencing* accounts. These are freely available 
via the web, but they are not unix shell accounts. they are a Backtalk 
construct that permits you to use the Backtalk system to authenticate. 
On Grex, Backtalk authenticates using real unix accounts, but on HVCN, 
it does not. The difference is in the way Backtalk is configured there.

The main difference though, is the connectivity. HVCN has far better 
connectivity than Grex, but if we allowed HVCN's machine to be used the 
way Grex is used, we would not be permitted to locate it there.

The HVCN computer itself is comparable in performance to the old sun-3. 
It is actually an old Mac-IIci (no kidding), running NetBSD instead of 
Mac-OS, on 8 MB Ram. So, it is much slower than Grex in absolute terms. 
However, its load is a good match for its capablities, and it handles 
its jobs fairly well.
orinoco
response 67 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 21:40 UTC 1997

IIci?!
richard
response 68 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 22:43 UTC 1997

I hate it when Ive been away for four days and find there were four
unsuccesful login attempts at my login on Saturday.  Why would someone
want to hack my login...I dont have any interesting files! *arg*
srw
response 69 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 19:06 UTC 1997

Perhaps someone forgot what their account name is. It is not unheard of 
for people try several times to get in with the wrong ID before 
realizing that their ID was a little different.
davel
response 70 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 21:01 UTC 1997

Possibly someone named Richard who uses that on other systems...
valerie
response 71 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 21:05 UTC 1997

This response has been erased.

rcurl
response 72 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 06:42 UTC 1997

System groggy and was down for long periods - what's up? Also, when trying
to send mail in pine, screen showed real gibberish (when dialed in). Weird
stuff happening...
janc
response 73 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 15:53 UTC 1997

Grex has been crashing regularly.  We don't know why.  Reboot times vary,
depending on how long it takes a staff person to get there, and how
reluctant it is to come back up.  It doesn't seem to be crashing in one very
consistant manner, but seems to be doing all sorts of odd things.
krj
response 74 of 283: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 03:12 UTC 1997

I just dialed 761-5041, it rang open, I telnetted over.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-283        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss