You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-91       
 
Author Message
25 new of 91 responses total.
scott
response 50 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 00:38 UTC 2001

Inetd had it's little feet up in the air again.
jhudson
response 51 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 19:38 UTC 2001

Will this help?

while :
do
 while ps -x | grep -q inetd
 do
 done
 inetd
done
gull
response 52 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 20:13 UTC 2001

Re #51:
If you ever actually use a script like this, you need to put a sleep command
in the body of the loop, or it will consume pretty significant amounts of
CPU.  Often a fairly long sleep interval, like 5 minutes, is appropriate.

i.e., something like:

while :
 do
  while ps -x | grep -q inetd
  do
   sleep 300
  done
  inetd
 done

I have a script on my FreeBSD box that follows a similar pattern, to monitor
my DSL connection and re-establish it if it goes down.  FreeBSD's ppp
software has an auto-redial function, but it doesn't work on
PPP-over-Ethernet connections because they lack a real carrier detect
signal.  Hence the script file kludge.
tpryan
response 53 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 22:36 UTC 2001

        Can that be made more intelligent?  That is, if it discovers "down"
reestablish connection and sleep for a minute.  On the next loop thru,
same thing.  Then as connect time gets longer, change the sleep from
5 minutes to 30 minutes.
scott
response 54 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 22:38 UTC 2001

I don't think that would make any difference.  There's no pattern to inetd
dying.  
jhudson
response 55 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 19:38 UTC 2001

I thought there was a option to make inetd run in the foreground.
The man page lists a -d option, but does not state what it does.
krj
response 56 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 20 02:45 UTC 2001

In scott's immortal phrase: inetd seems to have its little feet up 
in the air again.
 
Also, when I come in via ssh and run "mail," I get told there 
is no mail for me, when there are a few hundred messages there.
richard
response 57 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 20 03:00 UTC 2001

Very odd-- right now Grex is refusing telnet connections but Backtalk 
seems fine.  
remmers
response 58 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 20 06:55 UTC 2001

Not that odd.  Telnet uses inetd but Backtalk uses httpd.
gelinas
response 59 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 20 06:56 UTC 2001

ssh also avoids inetd.
gelinas
response 60 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 20 07:00 UTC 2001

BTW, it looks like someone picked up inetd, dusted it off, and sent it on its
way, some 47 minutes ago now.
gull
response 61 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 16:18 UTC 2001

 12:15pm  up 14 days, 12:16,  60 users,  load average: 29.64, 33.83, 35.94

Reminds me of the old days on the Sun 3...
katie
response 62 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 17:12 UTC 2001

(Should I be concerned if I log in and it says "2 failures since..." and
it wasn't me?) This happens from time to time, and I ask this q, and no
one ever answers it. 
brighn
response 63 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 17:49 UTC 2001

Maybe it's different people trying to crate an account and typing in "katie"
instead of whatever it is you'r supposed to do to create a new account. Some
systems create new accounts by you just entering a login id, and the system
checking to see if it's in use.

Either that, or somebody who's katie on another bbs and keeps forgetting that
she's not katie here.

Or it COULD be somebody trying to hack your system. ;}
gelinas
response 64 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 19:23 UTC 2001

Katie, try:

        last -10 katie

That should show the last 10 times someone successfully logged in as you.
If the connections are all ones you remember making, you should be fine.
slynne
response 65 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 21:36 UTC 2001

Yeah. once in a while when I am trying to log in, I forget and log in as 
sfremont or lynne (so if lynne ever sees failures, they are probably 
from me). I think someone named katie who might have 'katie' as a 
loginid somewhere else is just forgetting and trying to login as katie. 
katie
response 66 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 30 22:42 UTC 2001

I'm more worried about someone trying to log in as me and do nefarious
fairwitness (say that fast 5 times!) things.
i
response 67 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 03:25 UTC 2001

If the hypothetical bad guy was sniffing your password on the network,
looking over your shoulder, etc. he'd be into your account by now.  (But 
that's no reason to get careless about those things.)  So we'll presume 
that he's trying to guess your password.  You aren't using a password 
that he might find in the _21st Century Master Hacker's Guide to Popular 
Passwords (Unabridged)_, are you?  
davel
response 68 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 12:48 UTC 2001

If it's not more than one or two tries, occasionally, then I'd assume that
someone named Katie is forgetting where she is.  I do that to dave (whoever
that actually is) from time to time.
ea
response 69 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 15:51 UTC 2001

How do I get the birthday wisher program to display my birthday?
orinoco
response 70 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 17:31 UTC 2001

(Nefarious fairwitness things -- oh my!
 Nefarious fairwitness things -- oh my!
 Nefarious fairwitness things -- oh my!)
albaugh
response 71 of 91: Mark Unseen   Aug 31 21:45 UTC 2001

What are the IP addresses (sub net) listed when you dial in?
danr
response 72 of 91: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 00:09 UTC 2001

re #69: e-mail valerie.
eeyore
response 73 of 91: Mark Unseen   Sep 1 02:26 UTC 2001

I tend to do that to Meg everynow and then....but the I'll usually email her
to let her know that I was being a moron.
russ
response 74 of 91: Mark Unseen   Sep 5 02:46 UTC 2001

Dialing in on -3000, I got the modem with defective flow control.
4K into a 17K file, it overflowed the modem buffer and disconnected me.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-91       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss