|
Grex > Coop10 > #49: Nominations for the Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 88 responses total. |
mary
|
|
response 50 of 88:
| 
Nov 13 19:31 UTC 1997 |
Rob isn't interested in doing it this time around?
Maybe folks would have a good question or two but aren't
really looking to do the whole survey. Would you be willing
to accept questions from users, Valerie?
|
dpc
|
|
response 51 of 88:
|
Nov 14 03:02 UTC 1997 |
The nominations period has one more day to run. Who are the current
nominees who have accepted their nominations?
|
remmers
|
|
response 52 of 88:
|
Nov 14 11:56 UTC 1997 |
In order of mention, the nominees are:
dang
aruba
llanarth
scott
mziemba
mta
other (?)
jared
The (?) for 'other' means that he hasn't accepted yet, at least
not in this item.
|
valerie
|
|
response 53 of 88:
|
Nov 15 06:47 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 54 of 88:
|
Nov 15 10:49 UTC 1997 |
Re: 49, 50 & 53 Thanks, Rob. And thanks to Valerie
for volunteering to do if necessary.
While looking through my directory the other day I found
the Statement I used while a candidate in last year's
election. I think I'll just keep it around as I don't
think it will ever not reflect my feelings about Grex.
|
valerie
|
|
response 55 of 88:
|
Nov 15 14:42 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 56 of 88:
|
Nov 15 17:23 UTC 1997 |
Gee what a coincidence, so have I. :)
|
other
|
|
response 57 of 88:
|
Nov 15 19:02 UTC 1997 |
and i have received said mail, and am doing the requisite reading of the
bylaws while considering the most practical response.
to quote that famous republican iconoclast, "i'll be back."
|
other
|
|
response 58 of 88:
|
Nov 15 19:26 UTC 1997 |
having now read the bylaws and the articles of incorporation, i will accept
nomination to grex's board of directors. if my understanding is correct,
i have until 1 december to deliver to the treasurer a minimum of three months'
dues in order to be eligible for election to the board. please correct me
if that is wrong.
i will be writing a statement within the next few days.
thanks.
|
aruba
|
|
response 59 of 88:
|
Nov 16 06:00 UTC 1997 |
Re #58: I believe that is correct.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 60 of 88:
|
Nov 17 01:10 UTC 1997 |
Re #48: Yeah, that sounds familiar. And, thanks, it's good to be remembered
after so long. I guess I made a big enuf pain in the butt of myself that my
mere appearance was sufficient to cause a grimace. ;^)
|
jep
|
|
response 61 of 88:
|
Nov 17 18:09 UTC 1997 |
Thanks to all of the willing candidates. It is very difficult to put
your name up for consideration, and it is harder yet when winning means
a year of (probably thankless) service to the community. Best of luck
to all of you.
|
valerie
|
|
response 62 of 88:
|
Nov 17 18:26 UTC 1997 |
This response has been erased.
|
jep
|
|
response 63 of 88:
|
Nov 17 18:39 UTC 1997 |
Heh. I'd have probably known that if this was M-Net. (-:
|
remmers
|
|
response 64 of 88:
|
Nov 18 00:41 UTC 1997 |
I should probably mention that nominations are now closed, it
being after November 15. Voting starts on December 1 and runs
though December 15.
|
mziemba
|
|
response 65 of 88:
|
Nov 24 20:37 UTC 1997 |
Thanks for the reminder!
|
danr
|
|
response 66 of 88:
|
Nov 29 01:36 UTC 1997 |
It's definitely not a thankless job. Many of Grex's users are quite
appreciative of the efforts of the board members. I never felt bad
about my term as a board member.
|
danr
|
|
response 67 of 88:
|
Nov 29 01:37 UTC 1997 |
It's definitely not a thankless job. Many of Grex's users are quite
appreciative of the efforts of the board members. I never felt bad
about my term as a board member.
|
aruba
|
|
response 68 of 88:
|
Nov 29 06:21 UTC 1997 |
You can say that again.
|
davel
|
|
response 69 of 88:
|
Nov 29 15:27 UTC 1997 |
Yep. Bears repeating.
|
mta
|
|
response 70 of 88:
|
Nov 29 18:42 UTC 1997 |
Hmmm, looks like a backtalk response to me. (I'm happy toglad to see that
I'm not the only one who does that occasionally.) <g>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 71 of 88:
|
Nov 29 21:29 UTC 1997 |
(And I'm glad to happy to see that you're so happy to glad to see that,
Misti.)
(sorry)
|
danr
|
|
response 72 of 88:
|
Nov 30 01:52 UTC 1997 |
I'm so adamant about it, I thought I'd say it twice. :)
|
srw
|
|
response 73 of 88:
|
Nov 30 21:11 UTC 1997 |
A likely story.
|
richard
|
|
response 74 of 88:
|
Dec 1 15:37 UTC 1997 |
re:previous messages..cantbacktalk be fixed so that it wont enter
the identical message twice, even if it thinks it has been entered twice?
Ive had this happen to me and I hate having to go backj and
scribble repeat posts
|