|
Grex > Cinema > #68: Grex goes to the movies - The Summer Movies Review Item |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 323 responses total. |
klg
|
|
response 50 of 323:
| 
Jun 28 16:47 UTC 2004 |
She is the adult of the "household."
|
marcvh
|
|
response 51 of 323:
|
Jun 28 16:55 UTC 2004 |
If Hillary is his mommy that means he wasn't really cheating with
Lewinsky, right? Maybe he just needed a time-out or a spanking, instead
of an impeachment.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 52 of 323:
|
Jun 28 19:10 UTC 2004 |
He wasn't impeached because of cheating with Lewinsky. He was impeached
because he lied about it, causing billions of dollars to be spent to
understake a war not approved by Congress and undermining the very foundations
of our democratic society.....oh, sorry, I think I got the villians mixed up.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 53 of 323:
|
Jun 28 19:20 UTC 2004 |
I'm just pleased that, so far, we don't seem to have screwed up the way
Reagan did in trading arms for hostages.
|
tod
|
|
response 54 of 323:
|
Jun 28 21:14 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 55 of 323:
|
Jun 29 14:41 UTC 2004 |
I figure if you investigate someone for seven years with an unlimited
budget, and the worst you can come up with is a blow job, that's gotta
be a pretty clean administration.
|
twenex
|
|
response 56 of 323:
|
Jun 29 14:44 UTC 2004 |
Snicker.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 57 of 323:
|
Jun 29 16:21 UTC 2004 |
re #55: or more likely that the rest of the dirt they could dig up
was embarrassing to *both* sides.
|
tod
|
|
response 58 of 323:
|
Jun 29 17:08 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
klg
|
|
response 59 of 323:
|
Jun 29 19:54 UTC 2004 |
Ringo, perhaps. But those who actually know Kenneth Starr state that
he is an immensely good and decent person.
|
tod
|
|
response 60 of 323:
|
Jun 29 20:51 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
bru
|
|
response 61 of 323:
|
Jun 29 22:46 UTC 2004 |
it also doesn't excuse the lengths the Clinton Administration went to hide
things that were of no danger to it.
|
tod
|
|
response 62 of 323:
|
Jun 29 23:08 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
marcvh
|
|
response 63 of 323:
|
Jun 29 23:20 UTC 2004 |
The Bush Administration, by contrast, is a paragon of transparency who
is always happy to share information.
|
tod
|
|
response 64 of 323:
|
Jun 29 23:26 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 65 of 323:
|
Jun 30 00:07 UTC 2004 |
What did the Clinton Administration hide (especially things more egregious
than like Cheney's energy advisory panel)?
|
tod
|
|
response 66 of 323:
|
Jun 30 00:09 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 67 of 323:
|
Jun 30 00:19 UTC 2004 |
That would raise a stink.
|
jor
|
|
response 68 of 323:
|
Jun 30 01:40 UTC 2004 |
(rim shot for tod)
|
bru
|
|
response 69 of 323:
|
Jun 30 08:04 UTC 2004 |
did I say the Bush administration was perfect?
where were the first ladies papers? If they had been available the first week
it would have saved the government a load of money, but she lost them for over
2 years.
If you are being investigated, and you lose or hide needed documents, it is
going to caus ethe investigator to dig deeper.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 70 of 323:
|
Jun 30 15:46 UTC 2004 |
You never lose/misplace anything?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 71 of 323:
|
Jun 30 16:09 UTC 2004 |
re #70: I lose things all the time, but when I do it's pretty clear I
had no incentive to do so.. So far I've never "lost" documents that had
been subpoenaed in an investigation. Nor do I have a staff who can be
tasked with finding stuff for me.
|
tod
|
|
response 72 of 323:
|
Jun 30 16:12 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 73 of 323:
|
Jun 30 17:44 UTC 2004 |
I hope everyone would agree that someone losing something for which they
might have an incentive to lose is not necessary guility of doing so
deliberately.
|
tod
|
|
response 74 of 323:
|
Jun 30 18:03 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|