You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-96       
 
Author Message
25 new of 96 responses total.
furs
response 50 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 15:27 UTC 2006

we just hung out with bignasty's parents and watched the ball drop and 
went to bed at 12:05
jadecat
response 51 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 19:48 UTC 2006

This year was spent much like last year, at the (new) home of friends
Jeff and Amanda, with PJ and Janice there too. We add tasty snacks,
played Apples to Apples, drank Champagne to the New Year, went back to
Apples to Apples and then played Cranium (Girls won).
tod
response 52 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 00:31 UTC 2006

This year, we turned on the Dick Clark thing to see that hollow man utter his
prayers for being allowed to continue and I decided to flip over to the local
Seattle gig with John Curly in a diaper.  Dick Clark was scary lookin.
naftee
response 53 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 01:19 UTC 2006

i missed the new year.
we looked at our watches at like 12:09 or something.
richard
response 54 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 15:26 UTC 2006

re #52 I thought Dick Clark looked fine considering he's 76 years old 
and recovering from a severe stroke.  Lets see how you look at that 
age, after having to re-learn how to walk and talk.  I thought it was 
courageous for him to host the show this year.

re #46, bhelliom said:

"Met a new ptential pal"

Is his name George?  Oh wait, you already know a guy named George 
right?  :)
slynne
response 55 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 17:12 UTC 2006

I decided to stay home by myself. A friend of mine who is a bartender 
calls New Year s Eve, "amateur night" because of all the people who 
come out and feel that they need to party even though they aren t 
really party people so they end up drinking too much and making asses 
of themselves. I didn t feel that I needed to witness that this year 
and I definitely didn t want to do that myself even though being an 
amateur can be kind of fun even if it bugs everyone else around you. 

I cracked open a bottle of cheap Asti from Trader Joe s and ordered a 
pizza. I watched the last several episodes of the second season of 24. 
Around midnight, the dogs got all weird so I thought they might need a 
walk but then there were fireworks from the New Year s jubilee thing in 
Depot Town and the dogs got scared so I went home. I had two messages 
on my machine; one from the friends who live in Sonoma County and the 
other from happyboy. I called happyboy back and heard that his daughter 
is a big New Year s Eve party *animal*  

I was kind of bummed because I missed watching the ball drop. At first 
I thought it was the first year that I didnt watch it but then I 
remembered that I didnt watch it last year either because I was in 
Hawaii on New Years Eve. 

rcurl
response 56 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 17:48 UTC 2006

Where did this ball-dropping thing come from? They don't even *drop* it, 
for Pete's sake: more like letting it ooze down. Why not have it rise for 
a change? Or make it a cube? Or Dick Clark? I noticed in the news that 
elsewhere they are dropping other things. 
tod
response 57 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 17:53 UTC 2006

I'd hoped Clay Aiken would ride on the ball as it was lowered since they had
Ryan Seacrest in full annoyance.

re #54
You think people want to bring in the new year watching Steven Hawking on a
speak&spell do the count down?  Well, besides Son of the Beach fans..
marcvh
response 58 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 18:16 UTC 2006

Pizza and cheap champagne has been our New Year's Tradition for some time.
naftee
response 59 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 04:31 UTC 2006

is happyboy's daughter hot :!?

are you one of his old b/f/s or something, slynne ?!
slynne
response 60 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 13:57 UTC 2006

Maybe I am one of YOUR old b/f/s or something?
ric
response 61 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 14:05 UTC 2006

I celebrated by attending a Carolina Hurricanes hockey game, in which the
first place Canes beat down the montreal canadiens.

Then I took my niece home, got back to my house around 11:55, turned on the
TV, watched the ball drop, kissed my wife and went to sleep
bhoward
response 62 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 15:23 UTC 2006

Four days on and we are finished, or rather, I nearly was.
naftee
response 63 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 20:51 UTC 2006

re 60 
You're a guy ?!
dude.
uh !
that's creepy ?!
slynne
response 64 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:05 UTC 2006

...or something
bhelliom
response 65 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 05:30 UTC 2006

resp:54 George is no one's pal.
mcnally
response 66 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 23:58 UTC 2006

 That's probably a bit harsh.  I'll bet there are many who have been
 happy to see George again after an unexpected absence.
gull
response 67 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 02:39 UTC 2006

Re resp:56: "Time balls" were once commonly used as devices for
signalling standard time, mostly so ships at dock could reset their
chronometers:

http://www.tumblong.uts.edu.au/artefacts/greenwich/more.cfm
rcurl
response 68 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 06:55 UTC 2006

You're right! And, I knew that...but had gone blank in connecting the
*slow lowering* of the Times Square  ball, and the *dropping* of the
time balls used for chronometer synchronization. My search of the web,
however, did not find how fast they were "dropped:. They say they were
dropped, but since they were big (a yard of more in diameter, 50 lbs or so
in weight), I find it hard to imagine that they were simply dropped. More
likely, they were lowered, but rapidly. After all, a "minute is a mile
the world around" (that's *nautical* mile), so every second is ca. 31 meters,
so the ball would have to drop in much less than a minute to have a longitude
precision (at the equator) of one nautical mile. 
gull
response 69 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 23:09 UTC 2006

The nautical mile makes some kind of sense to me, but I've always
wondered where the statute mile comes from.
marcvh
response 70 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 00:04 UTC 2006

Well, it's 8 furlongs, obviously, and a furlong is 40 rods.  What could be
simpler?

What I find more mysterious is where "acre" came from, though I guess
it's 10 square chains, and a chain is 4 rods, so that makes sense enough.
aruba
response 71 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 04:21 UTC 2006

Which is why the chain was the unit of choice in a lot of old surveying, and
still appears on a lot of deeds.  (A chain is 66 feet.)
rcurl
response 72 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 06:31 UTC 2006

Then there is the *rood*, 0.25 acre or 40 square rods....

It gets more complicated (or more interesting?).

"The U.S. survey mile is equal to 5,280 U.S. survey feet, 6,336/3,937 km 
or approximately 1,609.347 m. One international mile is equal to 0.999 998 
survey miles. The survey mile is used by the United States Public Land 
Survey System."

"The international mile is the distance typically meant when the word mile 
is used without qualification. It is defined to be precisely 1,760 
international yards (by definition, 0.9144 m each) and is therefore 
exactly 1,609.344 m (1.609344 km). It is used in the United States and the 
United Kingdom as part of the Imperial system of units. The international 
mile is equivalent to 8 furlongs, 80 chains or 5,280 international feet."

"The statute mile is a mile of 5,280 feet, without specifying which foot 
is used. The term is therefore ambiguous."

(That's what http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mile says, but it still leaves a 
question as to which mile your odometer measures, and which is used for 
rods and chains.)

At least

"The international nautical mile is defined to be 1,852 m. It is used 
universally for aviation, naval and maritime purposes and originated from 
the geographical mile."

while

"The geographical mile is a unit of length determined by 1 minute of arc 
along the Earth's equator, approximately equal to 1855 metres (6087.15 
international feet)."

Which all makes it even more amazing that we landed the Rovers on Mars.
aruba
response 73 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 07:01 UTC 2006

Heh.  Well, the difference between an international mile and a survey mile
is less than 3.2mm, so not that big a deal.  My understading is that they
redefined the inch to be exactly 2.54cm at some point, and the rest of those
international definitions follow from that.
keesan
response 74 of 96: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 18:12 UTC 2006

South Ireland uses Euro's - are they also metric?
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-96       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss