|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 130 responses total. |
bru
|
|
response 50 of 130:
|
Oct 6 02:25 UTC 2003 |
It is also a problem with regard to Mexico's "brain Drain" . Profsssionals
in Mexico are making appointments and having their babies in the U.S. to get
their children a better future and themselves access to the country. (there
is a visa for parents of Citizen children, and for their siblings)
|
slynne
|
|
response 51 of 130:
|
Oct 6 14:26 UTC 2003 |
There wouldnt be a problem with "brain drain" if our so called free
trade agreement applied to labor too. We should just let any Canadians
and Mexicans into this country to work and vice versa. Imagine how
*that* would shake things up.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 52 of 130:
|
Oct 6 18:39 UTC 2003 |
(I'm reading Peter Drucker's "Managing in the Next Society." He's made very
similar points several times, and I'm only on starting the fifth essay.
Except it's not just labor; the new commodity is information.)
|
klg
|
|
response 53 of 130:
|
Oct 7 01:44 UTC 2003 |
You caught us there, Mr. richard. How on earth did you find out that
our grandparents swam across the Atlantic Ocean in order to avoid
passing through Ellis Island?? (It was a closely protected family
secret.) He is one sharp guy, ain't he!
(Also, a person may be born a citizen even if only one of is parents is
in the U.S. It would, I presume, have to be a particular parent.)
|
richard
|
|
response 54 of 130:
|
Oct 7 02:48 UTC 2003 |
klg, what you think every immigrant came through Ellis Island? hardly, many
came on smaller boats and deported elsewhere. Even if your ancestors did,
there are plenty of people who have become or became productive citizens who
did not enter in the normal places or legally. But there is a double standard
because most european immigrants were white, and not feared, whereas most
immigrants out in California and Texas are latinos or asians. The people like
Arnold who want to enact all these strict new laws on immigration, are really
acting out of fear, a fear of the changi ng racial demogrpahics in this
country.
\.
|
klg
|
|
response 55 of 130:
|
Oct 7 02:50 UTC 2003 |
We appreciate your clearing that up.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 56 of 130:
|
Oct 7 03:27 UTC 2003 |
Oh. My. Arnold is an immigrant. Recent, even, since he came over as
an adult. Yet he fears immigrants? Curiouser and curiouser.
|
richard
|
|
response 57 of 130:
|
Oct 7 04:36 UTC 2003 |
#57...read what I said, Arnold is a EUROPEAN immigrant. The immigrants
coming into California and Texas are largely latinos and asians. Not
white europeans. If you don't think racial politics plays into it, you
are being naive. I would bet anything that if all those immigrants
coming to California were white europeans like Arnold, he would not
have those views.
btw, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, who is pretty wealthy, is
promising to personally fund an immediate effort to recall Arnold if
he's elected. The partisan politics in California seem particularly
fierce. If the republicans succeed in getting Davis recalled, I don't
believe the democrats will rest until a republican is recalled. There
will be a recall effort next year, and the year after, and the year
after. IMO the only way to nip this thing in the bud, and save
California years of political misery and expensive petition drives and
recall elections, is to vote this one down. To say, as emphatically as
possible, that elections should only be held when they are regularly
scheduled to be held.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 58 of 130:
|
Oct 7 04:42 UTC 2003 |
Actually, I'd bet that if the European immigrants were illegals, in the
numbers we see from Mexico et al, he'd feel exactly the same way about them.
|
gull
|
|
response 59 of 130:
|
Oct 7 13:18 UTC 2003 |
Re #57: I'd guess the first thing whoever comes out of this as governor
will do is try to change or eliminate the recall option. Overall that
would be a good thing, since clearly it's a poorly thought out law.
Sort of like how the independent prosecutor law wasn't renewed after the
Republicans' massive multi-year, multi-million-dollar fishing expedition
made everyone realize how flawed it was.
|
lynne
|
|
response 60 of 130:
|
Oct 7 14:33 UTC 2003 |
In Germany (which I realize is not the same as Austria) the Turkish immigrants
come over in droves because they can get jobs there. They are viewed with
much the same mix of vague fear, disgust or mistrust that Latin- or African-
Americans tend to find in this country.
|
richard
|
|
response 61 of 130:
|
Oct 7 17:25 UTC 2003 |
re: #59...wouldn't arnold look hypocritical if he gets elected governor
through a recall election, and then moved to eliminate or change the recall
option?
|
other
|
|
response 62 of 130:
|
Oct 7 17:28 UTC 2003 |
It would only look hypocritical if everyone didn't already expect him to
do it.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 63 of 130:
|
Oct 7 17:52 UTC 2003 |
I'm surprised the legislature hasn't already started looking into it.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 64 of 130:
|
Oct 7 18:28 UTC 2003 |
Good if recall procedure changes become effective afther the
next regular election.
|
scg
|
|
response 65 of 130:
|
Oct 7 19:08 UTC 2003 |
My understanding is that the recall option would have to be changed by the
voters, not the legislature.
I suspect there will be some strengthening of the procedures for keeping
non-serious candidates off the ballot, but doubt there will be much support
for getting rid of recalls entirely.
I voted around 11:30 am (the polls are open from 8 am to 8 pm, I think). My
temporary consolodated polling place turned out to be somebody's rather
cramped one car garage. The table where the poll workers were sitting was
right behind the voters, facing the voting screens, so there was no secret
ballot. It didn't look to me like there would have been enough room to do
things differently, given the space provided. There wasn't a line (unlike
my last time voting in the normal polling place, which took more than an
hour), but I think I overheard somebody say that out of around 1,000
registered voters for that precinct, 300 had already voted, which would either
be really phenominal turnout, indicate that nobody was waiting until after
work to vote, or indicate that I heard one of the numbers incorrectly. Still,
I'll take high turnout in North Berkeley as good news, and hope it isn't
matched in more conservative areas. The messy part of the ballot was the
replacement election. Cruz Bustamonte's name was several screens deep on the
electronic voting machine. I'm not sure where Ah-nold's name was, since I
didn't look for it.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 66 of 130:
|
Oct 7 22:32 UTC 2003 |
NPR has been saying that turnout seems to be high.
I thought I heard that the recall procedures were in the constitution,
so yeah, it makes sense that the changes would have to be made by the
electorate. But who proposes them? "Grandfathering" of such things
usually protects current office-holders until their next election.
The changes I would expect to see are to the threshold for getting a recall
on the ballot, and to the threshold for getting replacements on the ballot.
_Perhaps_ the change will include separate balloting for the two. (NB:
I do NOT think it reasonable to allow people just recalled to run for
the positions they were forced to vacate.)
|
russ
|
|
response 67 of 130:
|
Oct 8 02:18 UTC 2003 |
Unlike some people, I do have a problem with Mexicans and such
coming here illegally. They may be a boon to the low-wage sector
of the economy, but if you made them pay for bilingual education
and the other special services they require I'll bet that they'd
stay home. This means that the public is subsidizing the
difference, and losing a bundle on the deal.
How American can someone be if they don't even speak the language?
I'd be happy to pay another ten cents a pound for my chicken so
that Tyson can make the job safe and rewarding enough to attract
workers from this side of the border. Besides, if these jobs
are so bad that workers are disabled by repetitive-stress
injuries, it's not fair to anyone to work them.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 68 of 130:
|
Oct 8 04:27 UTC 2003 |
"how american can someone be if they can't even speak the
language?"
uh...which one? lakota? hopi? anishinabe? choctaw? mandan?
|
richard
|
|
response 69 of 130:
|
Oct 8 04:36 UTC 2003 |
#67..."how american can someone be if they don't speak the language"
"if you made them pay for bilingual educa tion and the other special sservices
they require I'll bet that they'd stay home"
russ you in my personal opinion are indicating racist feelings with those
comments. also have you ever lived in a large city like new york? if you had,
you'd know there are many MANY people who are americans but who speak little
or no english. English isn't "the language", you aren't american because you
can or can't speak english.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 70 of 130:
|
Oct 8 04:42 UTC 2003 |
(But not knowing the language does make it hard to participate in the
political debate. Sure, you may get a bilingual ballot, but are the arguments
for and against going to be in both languages?)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 71 of 130:
|
Oct 8 05:43 UTC 2003 |
What fraction of voters read fully the arguments for and against a
proposal or person? They mostly get their information verbally, via the
media and personal contacts (with equally poorly informed voters). I
suspect that persons that do not know English but live in their ethnic
communities, are not particuarly less well informed than the English
speaking community, especially on matters and candidates that are of
direct concern to them.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 72 of 130:
|
Oct 8 05:54 UTC 2003 |
You are probably right, Rane. I'm not likely to hear their thoughts, though.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 73 of 130:
|
Oct 8 06:07 UTC 2003 |
Certainly not as continually as thoughts expressed in the language of the
majority (if you are a member of that language group). However minority
opinions from other language communities do have spokespersons, although
their voices, even though in English, do not get as widely reported.
|
scg
|
|
response 74 of 130:
|
Oct 8 07:40 UTC 2003 |
Regarding the results: Ick.
The touch screen voting machine gave a choice between getting the ballot in
English, Spanish, or some other language, Mandarin probably. But even in
California, non-US citizens can't vote.
The rights of illegal immigrants issue is really an extension of hte
California vs. the rest of the US issue. California in many ways operates
like a quasi-independant country rather than a US state (and is big enough
for that to work fairly well most of the time). Illegal immigrants are a
rather large part of the California population and the California workforce,
Spanish is a major language here, and California law is starting to recognize
that. I don't see much of a contridiction in California giving as many rights
as it can to those not in the US legally. I suspect if California were
allowed to control its own immigration policy, those immigrants wouldn't be
illegal at all.
|