|
Grex > Oldcoop > #195: Grex Board of Director's Meeting: Sept 10, 2004 | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 9 new of 58 responses total. |
aruba
|
|
response 50 of 58:
| 
Apr 1 03:28 UTC 2007 |
TS - I'm honestly not sure I remember which subpoena we were talking about
in this item. But if it's the one I think it is, we passed the publicly
readable contents of a particular user's directory to an FBI agent who
requested it, and that was the end of the matter as far as Grex was
concerned. We had reason to believe the directory contained a file of
credit card numbers, if I'm remembering correctly. I assume that they
didn't want us to talk about it publicly because they didn't want us to tip
off the user in question.
|
tod
|
|
response 51 of 58:
|
Apr 1 04:17 UTC 2007 |
re #50
Did you also pass along the list of realnames and login times for anyone with
write access to that user's directory?
|
aruba
|
|
response 52 of 58:
|
Apr 1 04:44 UTC 2007 |
We passed on exactly what was asked for.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 53 of 58:
|
Apr 1 13:45 UTC 2007 |
Nice dodge, but not exactly an answer to the question. Are you saying you
don't recall exactly what was asked for?
|
jadecat
|
|
response 54 of 58:
|
Apr 1 14:20 UTC 2007 |
Probably not off the top of his head- I know I don't. It was three years
ago. I don't recall specifically, and I haven't gone back to read the
minutes to refresh my memory. But I would say that we did exactly what
was asked- but no more, or less. We would have wanted to be cooperative,
but wouldn't have wanted to fall all over ourselves to get information
to the FBI, but also wanted to make sure that we did everything that we
could to make sure that we needed to hand anything over in the first
place. IF there had ben any doubt in our minds about complying with the
subpoena- we wouldn't have. Protecting the members would have been the
first priority.
|
tod
|
|
response 55 of 58:
|
Apr 1 17:06 UTC 2007 |
Just keep in mind when you comply to your interpreted extent with DoJ requests
that you might be called on later to testify. Conscientious omissions
pertaining to the subpoena could come back to bite you in cross examination.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 56 of 58:
|
Apr 1 17:15 UTC 2007 |
This was long enough ago that I don't think we need to worry about it now.
|
aruba
|
|
response 57 of 58:
|
Apr 2 02:40 UTC 2007 |
Re #53: THe answer to #51 is No.
Tod - do you want to renew your Grex membership? You haven't replied to my
reminders.
|
tsty
|
|
response 58 of 58:
|
May 22 07:59 UTC 2007 |
re 50 ,.. tnx
|