You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-71        
 
Author Message
22 new of 71 responses total.
twenex
response 50 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 13:41 UTC 2004

Are your numbers any less arbitrary?
aruba
response 51 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 16:18 UTC 2004

I think we really do need this amendment, unfortunately.
keesan
response 52 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 16:28 UTC 2004

Richard, have you been reading the coop conference for the last couple of
months?
albaugh
response 53 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 19:24 UTC 2004

No, but he's having fun holding conversations with himself.
richard
response 54 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 20:26 UTC 2004

#52...yes and I know there have been too many resolution proposals lately.
thats why I said why not just limit how often any individual member can
propose a resolution to once per season or something
twenex
response 55 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 20:27 UTC 2004

Once per *season*?
keesan
response 56 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 21:48 UTC 2004

That would not prevent certain idiots from posting duplicate proposals after
the first one posted by someone else lost.
gelinas
response 57 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 22:01 UTC 2004

(The good news is that we can simply vote YES on the current proposal
and not have to bother with richard's comments, many of which have been
discussed before.)
tod
response 58 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 00:05 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 59 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 00:07 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

russ
response 60 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 03:25 UTC 2004

Re #53:  Now if he could get anyone else to listen to him seriously,
he might not have to do that.
gelinas
response 61 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 03:32 UTC 2004

You may have a point, russ.  I'll have to think about how I listen to him.
albaugh
response 62 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 18:53 UTC 2004

Yeah, we've got to be on the lookout for "certain idiots".
tod
response 63 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 20:19 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jp2
response 64 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 23:51 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

scott
response 65 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 00:48 UTC 2004

My mother's been dead for years.  Guess you got rejected by every other woman?
albaugh
response 66 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 15:16 UTC 2004

Drift:  Yea!  To wit:

Welcome to the Co-op Conference [Ver 13]
1 newresponse item
remmers
response 67 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 20:55 UTC 2004

Today (Thursday, March 23) is the last day to vote on this.  The polls
close at midnight EST.
remmers
response 68 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 20:18 UTC 2004

Results of the vote:  34 out of 79 eligible members voted.  As a bylaw
amendment requires 75% of those voting to vote in favor, 26 was the
minimum number of yes votes required to pass this.  The totals are:

        yes     29
        no      5

The amendment passes.
tod
response 69 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 20:48 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

parcel
response 70 of 71: Mark Unseen   Mar 24 20:51 UTC 2004

it's pigmented by bugs.
jesuit
response 71 of 71: Mark Unseen   May 17 02:14 UTC 2006

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE
 0-24   25-49   50-71        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss