You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-57        
 
Author Message
8 new of 57 responses total.
cross
response 50 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 00:02 UTC 2007

I think the Principle of Least Surprise would dictate that PuTTY would use
the Windows behavior by default under Windows.  When in Rome, and all that....
twenex
response 51 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 08:59 UTC 2007

OTOH, maybe the developers figure that the majority of people who use PuTTY
will be familiar with X11 anyway, and thus TPOLS dictates that X11 behaviour
by default is necessary?
cross
response 52 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 28 09:16 UTC 2007

That's entirely possible, too.  I wonder what the rationale is....
remmers
response 53 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 12:56 UTC 2007

Re #51: That assumption may have been valid when PuTTY was new, but I'm 
doubtful that it's still valid.
maus
response 54 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 14:29 UTC 2007

resp:53 For those of us who have been using PuTTY for years, the X11 
way of doing it is ingrained in our brains, If they changed it to a 
Windows behaviour, it would break the kinesthetic processes for long-
time users. I think that it might benefit from a large-print warning on 
the webpage and a smaller-print explanantion of how to make it more 
Windowsish (Windowsy? Windowsesque?). 
remmers
response 55 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 15:48 UTC 2007

Oh, I have no objection to the X-like behavior remaining but don't think 
it should be the default.
cross
response 56 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 15:58 UTC 2007

I tend to agree with Remmers on this.  As long as the Windows behavior is
available, however, I don't particularly care about the default.
twenex
response 57 of 57: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 18:15 UTC 2007

Re: #53. Why's that? Most Windows users I know would consider typing commands
into a text window, at best neolithic, and at worst bonkers.
 0-24   25-49   50-57        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss