|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 18 new of 67 responses total. |
kami
|
|
response 50 of 67:
| 
Mar 13 06:57 UTC 1994 |
of course. it's my job.
|
vidar
|
|
response 51 of 67:
|
Mar 13 13:23 UTC 1994 |
Isn't that *eveybody's job*?
|
kami
|
|
response 52 of 67:
|
Mar 14 05:34 UTC 1994 |
yes, but someone's got to do it.
|
vidar
|
|
response 53 of 67:
|
Mar 14 19:59 UTC 1994 |
Okay, I'm going to go be insane again now...
|
orinoco
|
|
response 54 of 67:
|
Mar 14 21:13 UTC 1994 |
A man turned on the radio and listened to the news. A few minutes
later, he turned it off and drove to work. That's what happened
(Duh!)
|
kami
|
|
response 55 of 67:
|
Mar 14 23:42 UTC 1994 |
uh huh
|
vidar
|
|
response 56 of 67:
|
Mar 15 01:41 UTC 1994 |
Moo.
|
kami
|
|
response 57 of 67:
|
Mar 15 05:45 UTC 1994 |
of course. why didn't i think of that?
|
vishnu
|
|
response 58 of 67:
|
Mar 15 12:24 UTC 1994 |
WRONG! The correct answer is, 'A man |||<censored by opression|||'
|
priam
|
|
response 59 of 67:
|
May 18 05:13 UTC 1994 |
Was the radio manufactured by a Japanese corporation?
|
remmers
|
|
response 60 of 67:
|
May 18 10:40 UTC 1994 |
That's irrelevant.
|
lee
|
|
response 61 of 67:
|
May 22 19:24 UTC 1997 |
why is it irrelevant?
|
carl
|
|
response 62 of 67:
|
May 30 20:21 UTC 1997 |
Was it's entecedent in the description?
Was its entecedent in the description?
Was the entecedent of it in the description?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 63 of 67:
|
Jun 1 18:31 UTC 1997 |
Was it indecisive in the depiction?
|
carl
|
|
response 64 of 67:
|
Jun 2 13:48 UTC 1997 |
(s/ent/ant/ for #62, but don't s/ent/ant/g or you'll get
what I was trying to repair in the first place!)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 65 of 67:
|
Jun 3 18:20 UTC 1997 |
Truly, words to live by.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 66 of 67:
|
May 28 06:46 UTC 2002 |
resp:1 Yep, that was it. And he was buying his hos from me.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 67 of 67:
|
Dec 20 04:16 UTC 2002 |
Re 0: did anything unusual happen this day?
Guess: his morning routine is completely described in #0.
|