You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-60        
 
Author Message
11 new of 60 responses total.
aruba
response 50 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 27 13:23 UTC 2002

Hmmm.  I think, though, if you mark an item and then later someone posts
something new to it, it will show up as new and start at the right place. 
So mark at least works well for active items.  (This is from a single test,
so I hope I'm right.)
remmers
response 51 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 27 16:27 UTC 2002

You're probably right.  I didn't test that case.
davel
response 52 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 28 02:08 UTC 2002

That's consistent with the way fixseen works.  (It marks the item as read, but
doesn't mark any responses as read; so when someone posts a new response,
you're suddenly buried under all the old responses you used fixseen to avoid
reading.)
janc
response 53 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 28 04:32 UTC 2002

Weird.  In fronttalk the "new" and "postpone" commands can take response
number arguments.  If given, that will be the first new response the next
time you read it, whether new stuff has been posted or not.  I'll need to
add a "mark" command, and documentation.
cmcgee
response 54 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 29 13:50 UTC 2002

re 52:  Ah hah! that may explain my sense of "I thought I caught up, but it
seems like I didn't"
davel
response 55 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 30 01:07 UTC 2002

(Try something like "read 5 p > /dev/null" to really catch up that way.)
cmcgee
response 56 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 30 15:21 UTC 2002

When I use the "n" command, it marks something as new, but it doesn't let me
see anything past that. Is there some way to leave only one item marked as
new?
scott
response 57 of 60: Mark Unseen   Sep 30 16:24 UTC 2002

"po", for "postpone".
carson
response 58 of 60: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 05:16 UTC 2002

(or "pr", for "preserve".)
jaklumen
response 59 of 60: Mark Unseen   Mar 25 02:05 UTC 2003

interestingly enough, I did browse the vomit conference once.  Strange 
and icky sort of funky, but whatever floats your boat.

re: way back there, I think it's usually best to have an agora item 
linked to the specialty conf (unless the participants don't want that 
for some reason) and then note that the item has been linked.  Ken 
does this quite frequently with music items.

Remember that there is often an agora item that promotes the other 
conferences.

Also, a few dead conferences have found new life with new subjects: 
notably Inferno and Steve (now titled Perky).

Note also that my reply is several months past the last one.  Who 
knows-- these conferences might come alive with some funky newcomer.  
We've seen enigma go in fits and starts, and basically recovery is 
active as needed.  I think maybe the latter got a little more activity 
because I wanted it to and I took the fairwitness responsibilities.

Sorry, Richie, I heartily disagree.
carson
response 60 of 60: Mark Unseen   Mar 25 02:42 UTC 2003

(nah, I think coop will remain dead.  thanks for playing.)
 0-24   25-49   50-60        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss