|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 20 new of 69 responses total. |
dpc
|
|
response 50 of 69:
|
Jan 16 15:26 UTC 1998 |
I always thought Ameritech reserved the right to change its charges any
time it wanted. Does our Centrex contract have a fixed price in it?
|
scott
|
|
response 51 of 69:
|
Jan 16 17:04 UTC 1998 |
Yes. We had to decide how long we wanted to commit to those prices.
|
aruba
|
|
response 52 of 69:
|
Jan 17 02:54 UTC 1998 |
Well, I didn't call today. I'll try to do it Monday.
|
tsty
|
|
response 53 of 69:
|
Jan 21 10:17 UTC 1998 |
<<ameriwreck reserves the right to insert two or more wires
into your bank account and suck as hard as possible.>>
|
aruba
|
|
response 54 of 69:
|
Jan 21 16:48 UTC 1998 |
Ack. I called Shirley on Monday, but she was out. Since then I've been sick
and haven't tried calling her back. I will try to do it RSN. STeve, did you
find out anything else from MPSC?
|
steve
|
|
response 55 of 69:
|
Jan 21 21:54 UTC 1998 |
I'm still dealing with them. sigh
|
lilmo
|
|
response 56 of 69:
|
Jan 22 22:19 UTC 1998 |
Those of us safely out of the loop *really* appreciate the time, effort, and
procrastination you are putting into these problems. :-)
|
valerie
|
|
response 57 of 69:
|
Jan 23 21:42 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
dpc
|
|
response 58 of 69:
|
Jan 24 03:01 UTC 1998 |
Glad to see Working Assets is in the running!
|
aruba
|
|
response 59 of 69:
|
Jan 24 18:10 UTC 1998 |
Thanks, Valerie. To clarify: the fee Ameritech charges for having no LD
carrier applies only to our ISDN lines, not to our regular lines. At $.95
per line, I *think* that's 4 * $.95 = $3.80/month. So Sprint, MCI, and
AT&T are not cheaper than having no long distance carrier at all. (Unless
you're figuring in something I'm not.)
I need to call Shirley and confirm that, though - but I was too sick all
week. I'm mostly better now, so I'll try to do it on Monday. <sigh>
|
valerie
|
|
response 60 of 69:
|
Jan 25 17:16 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 61 of 69:
|
Jan 26 20:29 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 62 of 69:
|
Jan 26 20:50 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
dpc
|
|
response 63 of 69:
|
Jan 26 21:48 UTC 1998 |
Working Assets is not "partisan" because it is not a candidate for
partisan public office and it is not a political party. This is
just the kind of tail-chasing question that 501 (c)(3) status
raises and why Grex should avoid it.
|
mta
|
|
response 64 of 69:
|
Jan 26 22:39 UTC 1998 |
Valerie, it seems to me that the by-laws don't say we have to pay more for
a service in order 8not* to support partisan companies. Heck, that would mean
we couldn't serve Dominos pizza at board meetings because a part of that money
would end up supporting the Word of God religious organization. (Not
something I'd want to do ... but not, I think, forbidden by the by-laws.)
Now sending some money directly to Planned Parenthood or the Word of God
community *would* be a proiblem.
|
scg
|
|
response 65 of 69:
|
Jan 27 00:17 UTC 1998 |
We would be paying Working Assets for service, and they would be spending
money on political causes. Ameritech does a lot of lobbying too, so if we
can't get service from Working Assets we can't get it from Ameritech either.
If Working Assets' marketing people are willing to give us $10 for switching
to them, we should take it. They knew when they made the offer that some
people wouldn't make many, if any, long distance calls.
|
aruba
|
|
response 66 of 69:
|
Jan 27 06:23 UTC 1998 |
Thanks for calling Shirley, Valerie. I hadn't realized that the
$.30 per line per month increase was due to lack of a long distance carrier;
that means we can kill two birds with one stone by designating a carrier.
|
tsty
|
|
response 67 of 69:
|
Feb 10 01:21 UTC 1998 |
....adn that carrier is .......:?
|
valerie
|
|
response 68 of 69:
|
Feb 10 13:37 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 69 of 69:
|
May 11 23:01 UTC 1998 |
Just make sure that the fine print doesn't say, "Rates subject to change w/o
notice," or some such! :-)
.\
|