You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-69        
 
Author Message
20 new of 69 responses total.
dpc
response 50 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 15:26 UTC 1998

I always thought Ameritech reserved the right to change its charges any 
time it wanted.  Does our Centrex contract have a fixed price in it?
scott
response 51 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 17:04 UTC 1998

Yes.  We had to decide how long we wanted to commit to those prices.
aruba
response 52 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 02:54 UTC 1998

Well, I didn't call today.  I'll try to do it Monday.
tsty
response 53 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 10:17 UTC 1998

<<ameriwreck reserves the right to insert two or more wires
into your bank account and suck as hard as possible.>>
aruba
response 54 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 16:48 UTC 1998

Ack.  I called Shirley on Monday, but she was out.  Since then I've been sick 
and haven't tried calling her back.  I will try to do it RSN.  STeve, did you
find out anything else from MPSC?
steve
response 55 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 21:54 UTC 1998

   I'm still dealing with them.   sigh
lilmo
response 56 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 22:19 UTC 1998

Those of us safely out of the loop *really* appreciate the time, effort, and
procrastination you are putting into these problems.  :-)
valerie
response 57 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 21:42 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

dpc
response 58 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 03:01 UTC 1998

Glad to see Working Assets is in the running!
aruba
response 59 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 18:10 UTC 1998

Thanks, Valerie.  To clarify: the fee Ameritech charges for having no LD
carrier applies only to our ISDN lines, not to our regular lines.  At $.95
per line, I *think* that's 4 * $.95 = $3.80/month.  So Sprint, MCI, and
AT&T are not cheaper than having no long distance carrier at all.  (Unless
you're figuring in something I'm not.) 

I need to call Shirley and confirm that, though - but I was too sick all
week.  I'm mostly better now, so I'll try to do it on Monday.  <sigh>

valerie
response 60 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 17:16 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

valerie
response 61 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 20:29 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

valerie
response 62 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 20:50 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

dpc
response 63 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 21:48 UTC 1998

Working Assets is not "partisan" because it is not a candidate for
partisan public office and it is not a political party.  This is
just the kind of tail-chasing question that 501 (c)(3) status
raises and why Grex should avoid it.
mta
response 64 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 22:39 UTC 1998

Valerie, it seems to me that the by-laws don't say we have to pay more for
a service in order 8not* to support partisan companies.  Heck, that would mean
we couldn't serve Dominos pizza at board meetings because a part of that money
would end up supporting the Word of God religious organization.  (Not
something I'd want to do ... but not, I think, forbidden by the by-laws.)

Now sending some money directly to Planned Parenthood or the Word of God
community *would* be a proiblem.
scg
response 65 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 00:17 UTC 1998

We would be paying Working Assets for service, and they would be spending
money on political causes.  Ameritech does a lot of lobbying too, so if we
can't get service from Working Assets we can't get it from Ameritech either.

If Working Assets' marketing people are willing to give us $10 for switching
to them, we should take it.  They knew when they made the offer that some
people wouldn't make many, if any, long distance calls.
aruba
response 66 of 69: Mark Unseen   Jan 27 06:23 UTC 1998

Thanks for calling Shirley, Valerie.  I hadn't realized that the
$.30 per line per month increase was due to lack of a long distance carrier;
that means we can kill two birds with one stone by designating a carrier.
tsty
response 67 of 69: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 01:21 UTC 1998

....adn that carrier is .......:?
valerie
response 68 of 69: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 13:37 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

lilmo
response 69 of 69: Mark Unseen   May 11 23:01 UTC 1998

Just make sure that the fine print doesn't say, "Rates subject to change w/o
notice," or some such!  :-)
.\
 0-24   25-49   50-69        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss