|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 22 new of 71 responses total. |
gull
|
|
response 50 of 71:
| 
Oct 23 20:19 UTC 2003 |
I think it was true that stuff would fluidly resize back when people
were still treating HTML as a content description language, instead of a
way to get a specific page layout.
|
keesan
|
|
response 51 of 71:
|
Oct 23 21:23 UTC 2003 |
I tried out one IE-based browser which did not display part of the menu when
used at less than 1024 resolution (such as the help menu). Nor did it work
with Win95 at all. The author did not bother testing it on older hardware
or software. He sent me a free registration code when I started to report
this sort of bug.
|
gull
|
|
response 52 of 71:
|
Oct 24 13:25 UTC 2003 |
Sometimes if the screen is too narrow to display part of the menu bar,
there's a little arrow on the right edge you can click to get at the
remaining items.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 53 of 71:
|
Oct 27 03:23 UTC 2003 |
On measureing the real content area on my good computer, I find
I get close to 14" on the 17" screen. When I use the old computer
to grex, I get all 13" of the !3" monitor.
|
kaplan
|
|
response 54 of 71:
|
Nov 2 16:58 UTC 2003 |
At work:
17" CRT
1152 x 864
no aol
LAN in our office is probably faster than broadband
Mozilla 1.4.1
At home:
19" CRT
1280 x 1024
no aol
Cable modem from Comcast
Mozilla 1.4.1
See the "Browsers Used to Access Google" graph on
http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html
It looks like the fraction of people using anything other than MSIE is
tiny, although I suppose Opera (and other browsers?) may count as MSIE
as far as Google's data collection method can tell.
|
eprom
|
|
response 55 of 71:
|
Nov 2 18:07 UTC 2003 |
woah!...interesting...
|
tsty
|
|
response 56 of 71:
|
Nov 3 09:56 UTC 2003 |
... whew ...
21" (all four)
1024x768
no aol (this is a question????)
t-1
newtscrape 4.79-7.1 (dependingon the b0x)
ok, i confess - it is cable but NO one else is on this link,
speeds are reliably in excess of 1.8 Mb/s, faster tehn t-1.
|
twenex
|
|
response 57 of 71:
|
Nov 9 09:04 UTC 2003 |
1. 17" CRT
2. 1024x768
3. no
4. no
5. Konqueror/Opera (Linux), Opera (XP)
|
gancelli
|
|
response 58 of 71:
|
Nov 23 14:09 UTC 2003 |
17"
1024x768
no
yes
opera
|
dcat
|
|
response 59 of 71:
|
Nov 27 07:08 UTC 2003 |
#1 & 2 from memory; I don't have it in front of me now
1) 15" CRT
2) 1280 x 1024
3) no
4) I have U of Pittsburgh campus ethernet. speeds vary from hundreds-of-bytes
per second to occassionally nearly a hundred K.
5) at home i use Opera on Linux. on campus I use Konqueror on Linux; Safari
on OS X; and IE on Windows.
|
willcome
|
|
response 60 of 71:
|
Nov 27 08:12 UTC 2003 |
30-6-54
|
remmers
|
|
response 61 of 71:
|
Nov 27 13:37 UTC 2003 |
(Re #59: 1280x1024 is pretty high resolution for a 15" screen.
Doesn't everything look kinda tiny?)
|
dcat
|
|
response 62 of 71:
|
Nov 28 02:00 UTC 2003 |
some things are a bit small, but i'm another one of these people who likes to
have multiple terminals and such open. I also like very large terminals---
120x50 or bigger --- so i like having lots of space :)
my eyes also aren't too bad, so the size doesn't usually bother me. opera's
got one-key text resizing, also, so it's not hard to fix when things *are*
too small :)
|
oval
|
|
response 63 of 71:
|
Nov 28 10:58 UTC 2003 |
12", 1280x854, no, yes, mozilla
|
mcnally
|
|
response 64 of 71:
|
Nov 28 19:58 UTC 2003 |
1280 x 854?
(is that the screen size of the 12" Powerbook?)
|
oval
|
|
response 65 of 71:
|
Nov 29 17:54 UTC 2003 |
that's my resolution so says my XF86Config. my macos partition is 1024x768.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 66 of 71:
|
Nov 29 19:58 UTC 2003 |
Weird. Apple might've tweaked it for some sort of DVD aspect-ratio-related
reasons.
|
oval
|
|
response 67 of 71:
|
Dec 4 17:16 UTC 2003 |
</blinks>
|
candler
|
|
response 68 of 71:
|
Feb 22 16:15 UTC 2004 |
1)17''
2)1280 x 1024
3)no
4)i am using METU campus ethernet.
5)mostly opera,plus IE.
|
antz
|
|
response 69 of 71:
|
May 9 10:04 UTC 2004 |
1. 17" crt
2. 1024x768
3. no
4. no
5. ie6
|
prp
|
|
response 70 of 71:
|
Aug 18 22:42 UTC 2004 |
1: 12.1" iBook; 2:800x600; 3:no; 4:Yes; 5:Safari;
Has anyone done a summary of all the responses?
|
eprom
|
|
response 71 of 71:
|
Aug 27 17:14 UTC 2004 |
a long time ago I did, but since ya'll are a bunch of geeks, it was skewed
and didn't represent the avg population as a whole.
|
