You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74        
 
Author Message
25 new of 74 responses total.
gull
response 50 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 19:32 UTC 2003

Re #41: That's pretty much the argument one school district is using for
giving kids Eid (a Muslim holiday) off.  So much of their student body is
Muslim that they wouldn't meet attendance requirements for calling it an
"official" school day.

My schools always had Good Friday off, though they were careful not to
*call* it that...of course, we got the first day of rifle season off, too. 
I guess some people would consider that a religious holiday as well. ;>
twenex
response 51 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 19:40 UTC 2003

President's Day? If that coincides with a holiday in the
uk, remind me to find a job where i'll have to be at work
that day until such time as the democrats win the
presidential.
mynxcat
response 52 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 20:18 UTC 2003

I think President's day was for the birth anniversary of two 
presidents, Lincoln and Washington, and they picked a day between the 
two brith anniversaries? Or have I been misinformed?
glenda
response 53 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 21:06 UTC 2003

You got it.  Lincoln's birthday is Feb. 12, Washington's is Feb 22.  We used
to get both off (I worked for the City of Westland), then it was changed to
the Monday between them and I lost a holiday, regained when when Martin Luther
King day came into being.
twenex
response 54 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 21:41 UTC 2003

Maybe it's not more important to commemmorate than to
"doiscommemmorate" then.
tod
response 55 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 23:03 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tpryan
response 56 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 23:20 UTC 2003

        Was Washington's birthday Feb 22nd new calendar or old calendar
(jump in days in his lifetime)?
twenex
response 57 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 23:36 UTC 2003

#54 shouldn't have a "not" in it.
klg
response 58 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 03:00 UTC 2003

2003:

Federal law (5 U.S.C. 6103) establishes the following public holidays 
for Federal employees.  Please note that most Federal employees work on 
a Monday through Friday schedule.  For these employees, when a holiday 
falls on a nonworkday -- Saturday or Sunday -- the holiday usually is 
observed on Monday (if the holiday falls on Sunday) or Friday (if the 
holiday falls on Saturday).

Wednesday, January 1    New Year's Day
Monday, January 20      Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.
Monday, February 17     Washington's Birthday
Monday, May 26          Memorial Day
Friday, July 4          Independence Day
Monday, September 1     Labor Day
Monday, October 13      Columbus Day
Tuesday, November 11    Veterans Day
Thursday, November 27   Thanksgiving Day
Thursday, December 25   Christmas Day


re 52:  We did not know that Presidents Washington & Lincoln were 
Jewish.

re 49:  No Jew would take Hanukah off for religious reasons.
bru
response 59 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 04:10 UTC 2003

Not important what people in other countries or who follow different religions
do.  The fact is that many people would take Christmas off, and in so doing,
would make any attempt to maintain a regular business climate impossible. 
Now, there are places that do stay open on Christmas, but that is up to them.
no one forces anyone to close on any holiday.  Most businesses know how not
to thri their money w\away.Good Friday, Most places I have worked offer the
employees two hours off without pay on Good Friday to go to church..
mynxcat
response 60 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 04:54 UTC 2003

Re 58> Who said anything about Lincoln or Washington being Jewish? Where the
hell did that question come from?

And I'm not very aware of the Jewish faith. I may be wrong in thinking they'd
want to take hanukkah off.

Also, what is the pont of your post? It reiterated what gelinas said, and
brought up a point that was never debated? Did you even read what people had
to say?
tsty
response 61 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 05:58 UTC 2003

for a while .. there was a publicized trade between christians and jews so
that each would work the others' holidays ... 
 
howeer taht was in the 60s when peace love and understanding prospered
beside protest ... 
  
media these dyas wouldn't *dare* announce such cooperation.
gelinas
response 62 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 06:13 UTC 2003

mynxcat, the penultimate sentence of #58 was a pun, based upon the
misspelling of the second occurrence of "birth", as "brith", in your
response.  In Hebrew, "brith" means 'cutting' and is a reference to
circumcision.

I'd thought Presidents Day was established at the same time as Martin
Luther King Day, to keep the total number of holidays the same.
tpryan
response 63 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 14:03 UTC 2003

        Some New England states also have a day-off holiday
for Patirot's day.  April 19th or the Monday before it.  ?
klg
response 64 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 17:20 UTC 2003

re:  "#62(gelinas):  In Hebrew, "brith" means 'cutting' and is a 
reference to circumcision."

More accurately "ritual circumcision."  (And the Hebrew word "brith" 
means "covenant."  In Hebrew, the United States is called "Artzot 
ha'Brith" - the "lands of the covenant (agreement)".  B'nai Brith = 
Sons of the Covenant.)

And

"I'd thought Presidents Day was established at the same time as Martin
Luther King Day, to keep the total number of holidays the same."

As demonstrated by the listing, there is no "Presidents Day" as far as 
the federal government is concerned.
mynxcat
response 65 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 18:53 UTC 2003

Aaah. Now I understand. Thanks Joe.

I guess President's Day is just a bank holiday then? I know we get it.
jp2
response 66 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 19:28 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mynxcat
response 67 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 23:14 UTC 2003

Washington's and Lincoln's.
richard
response 68 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 04:13 UTC 2003

Bru got #0's story from Worldnet Daily (www.worldnetdaily.com)  Be advised
that this "news" site is run by a far right wing fringe group, run by
Joseph Farah.  Here is a bit about Farah:

http://hnn.us/comments/13537.html:

"Joseph Farah describes the United States as a moral wasteland and calls
on Americans to embrace God. His proposal for change includes abolishing
the income tax and the IRS, withdrawing from all international treaties
and institutions, repealing all gun laws and ending federal funding for
schools, the arts, conservation, housing and agriculture while
simultaneously expanding the role of the church in national life,
including actively censoring the entertainment industry and having a
direct role in education and family life." 

Get your news from credible news sources.  Do not get your news from "news
sources" that are really fronts for groups with radical agendas.  The guys
behind Worldnet Daily are as fringe radical as the Rev. Sun Yung Moon's
group that puts out the Washington Times.

Also pushing this lawsuit will not get nativity scenes allowed back in
schools, it will have the opposite effect.  If anything it will cause the
other religious symbols to be banned.  And I reject wholeheartedly the
notion that christians are being made "victims" and "second class
citizens" in this country because of trivial things like this.  Not when I
am an athiest and all the money I have to carry around in my wallet says,
"In GOD We Trust".  

bru
response 69 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 16:43 UTC 2003

Be advised, I did find tha site you mentined, but that was only after I had
gotten information from another location.
klg
response 70 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 23 01:56 UTC 2003

re: 68-

Please be advised that you are reading a 4th-hand accout regarding Mr. 
Farah.  (i.e., Mr. richard is quoting somebody who is quoting another 
source of what Mr. Farah's supposed views are.)  If we have learned 
anything up to this point, it is that Mr. richard is quite an unreliable 
source of information himself, let alone at such a distance from the 
original source.
Perhaps Mr. richard might be able to provide some direct information, 
but we suspect not.
richard
response 71 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 23 04:43 UTC 2003

no klg, maybe you might be able to provide direct information refuting what
was posted about Farah.  Do a google search on his name, you'll see
numerous of his writings, first hand proof of his radical views.  Some
fringe crackpot puts up a website with an official sounding name, like
worldnet daily, and people automatically assume he is credible.  He isn't.
This guy is another egomaniac political wannabe gadfly like Lyndon
LaRouche.  But of course klg doesn't care whether he's credible or not,
because klg claims that he alone knows what is best for society.  I am
starting to think that klg's continued refererring to himself as "we"
indicates he has some sort of "messiah" complex, like this Farah character
seems to, and he envisions himself as having followers, thus "we" and not
"I".  Joseph Farah and klg are bretheren!
klg
response 72 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 23 17:21 UTC 2003

Mr. richard:
Was it you who posted the link regarding Mr. Farah?  And was not the 
link to a 3rd-hand source?
Do you not think that you ought to be the one repsponsible for 
defending your own source material?
(Not that we are surprised by your reaction.  It is that to which we 
have become accustomed.)
Thank you.
klg
tsty
response 73 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 05:15 UTC 2003

wroldnetdaily is rightwhing????   are you concious?
willcome
response 74 of 74: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 09:37 UTC 2003

whore??????
 0-24   25-49   50-74        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss