You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-68        
 
Author Message
19 new of 68 responses total.
gull
response 50 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 21:06 UTC 2003

Re #43: It seems like we have two choices when it comes to "hard" drug
offenders:  Either we give them treatment to overcome their addictions,
or we put them back on the street still addicted and watch them commit
more crimes until finally they get locked up for life.  In that case, we
end up paying for their health care for the rest of their lives, so
paying for treatment sounds like the cheaper option.
novomit
response 51 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 12 22:52 UTC 2003

Or, we could just put them to sleep. 
russ
response 52 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 02:13 UTC 2003

Re #51:  Great idea.  Rather than putting up with burglary and such
from drug addicts, they'll then be motivated to kill to avoid being
arrested and accused because the penalty for murder is no worse.

I'd like to introduce you to this old politician.  His name's Draco...
novomit
response 53 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 09:27 UTC 2003

Well, it would do wonders for the population problem . . . 
oval
response 54 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 11:21 UTC 2003

so would genocide, nuclear warfare, and re-electing Bush.

novomit
response 55 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 11:24 UTC 2003

Youhave to think of the greater good though. Genocide might kill a lot of
people, but think of all the good it would do to all those who are left?
Surely you wouldn't mind dying for the greater good, yes?
oval
response 56 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 12:03 UTC 2003

harhar
novomit
response 57 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 12:05 UTC 2003

Dammit, people criticise me for lack of ironic sense and when i finally use
it, no one gets it. maybe I should stick to being direct?
gull
response 58 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 18:52 UTC 2003

Sometimes you have to tag your sarcasm for the humor-impaired.
novomit
response 59 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 13 19:03 UTC 2003

Suppose you suffer for humour impairment myself though? 
mynxcat
response 60 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 14 16:31 UTC 2003

I was just going to say whag resp 57 said. Russ needs to tweak his 
sarcasm meter :P
klg
response 61 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 00:36 UTC 2003

[O]ne of the problems with our party is people will say anything to get 
to be president of the United States..."  

HOWARD DEAN
MSNBC's "Buchanan & Press," 8/12/03
gull
response 62 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 00:47 UTC 2003

I'd say that's the problem with politicians in general.  Examples from 
both parties abound.
klg
response 63 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 00:49 UTC 2003

Mr. gull,
Do you mean that Mr. Dean is lying when he says that politicians will 
lie?
That makes sense, we suppose.
goose
response 64 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 01:18 UTC 2003

How could you extract that from what David said?  We think David was saying
that what Mr. Dean said is applicable to either party not just the one of Mr.
Dean's.  I also find that to be true, and a problem as well.
polytarp
response 65 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 01:29 UTC 2003

David?!  Wahjat david?!
polytarp
response 66 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 01:29 UTC 2003

O< BROAD BUCK.
mary
response 67 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 13:08 UTC 2003

I like it just the way Dean said it.  It's a stronger
statement.
polytarp
response 68 of 68: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 14:53 UTC 2003

I agree with Mary Remmers.
 0-24   25-49   50-68        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss