You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-61        
 
Author Message
12 new of 61 responses total.
gull
response 50 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 17 21:59 UTC 2003

CNN's slant these days is basically pro-corporate, I think.
goose
response 51 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 00:41 UTC 2003

RE#47 -- I stand corrected and bow my head in shame.....
oval
response 52 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 18 14:23 UTC 2003

CNN is pure fear-propaganda.

gull
response 53 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 19 14:37 UTC 2003

FOX tends to be more sensationalist, but CNN is a strong runner-up.
mvpel
response 54 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 01:01 UTC 2003

I was subjected to CNN in various airports, and I was struck by how often they
felt the need to run their "CNN: The most trusted name in news" promo.  Trying
to apply the old "oft-repeated lie" principle, perhaps?
mcnally
response 55 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 04:38 UTC 2003

  Perhaps they saw how many people had swallowed Fox "Fair and Balanced" News'
  tripe..

  As distressing as it is to contemplate, CNN might actually *be* "the most
  trusted name in news." (which says nothing about their accuracy, just about
  what television-news viewers are accustomed to accept as reporting.)
rcurl
response 56 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 05:58 UTC 2003

CNN was the only station I could find that showed a Hubble photo of Mars
tonight. It was *much* better than with my binoculars (which only served
to prove that I shake....). 

I look at CNN headline news to get some idea of what has happened recently
of the headline variety, not expecting with a "trusted name" or "fair and
balanced". There are other sources that are better for those. My biggest
gripe is that there is only maybe 25% "news": the rest is advertising and
grandstanding.
goose
response 57 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 16:50 UTC 2003

Exactly.  I use CNN to find out what the heck is going on, and then find
may other sources to find out the more indepth "why's".
tod
response 58 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 16:55 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

tpryan
response 59 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 16:58 UTC 2003

CNN Healines news still looks like an exploded web page, with news
stories put into some mixer and randomly presented.
tod
response 60 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 28 17:01 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 61 of 61: Mark Unseen   Aug 29 00:05 UTC 2003

I usually try the BBC's web page first, then go to CNN's out of
desperation if the BBC doesn't have anything about whatever bit of
breaking news I'm interested in.
 0-24   25-49   50-61        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss