You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   472-496   497-521   522-546   547-571   572-596   597-621   622-646   647-671 
 672-696   697-721   722-746   747-771   772-796   797-821   822-846   847-871   872-896 
 897-921   922-946   947-971   972-996   997-1021   1022-1046   1047-1071   1072-1096   1097-1121 
 1122-1146   1147-1171   1172-1196   1197-1221   1222-1246   1247-1271   1272-1296   1297-1321   1322-1346 
 1347-1371   1372-1396   1397-1421   1422-1446   1447-1471   1472-1496   1497-1521   1522-1546   1547-1571 
 1572-1578          
 
Author Message
25 new of 1578 responses total.
other
response 497 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 03:51 UTC 2003

Something above has been scored incorrectly.
crate is scored as 2, but crowd and croon both disallow the c and r, 
which leaves 2 letters of the a,t and e.  If we posit the a, then both 
the e and the t are excluded, by scoring blare and ghats as 1 each.  If 
we posit the e, then 1 white excludes the t, and 1 blare excludes the a.

Correction, please...

Joe slipped in.  Heh...
janc
response 498 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 04:09 UTC 2003

Joe is correct.  I'm going to guess arbitrarily that "white" was mis-scored,
and say

forte
gelinas
response 499 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 04:21 UTC 2003

Given 

        1 throb janc

and the problems with --ate , I'm inclined to think the scoring is
sufficiently confused that further guesses would be wasted.
janc
response 500 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 04:52 UTC 2003

Wasted?  How could they be wasted?  An error in scoring just makes the game
more interesting.  I've thought about a version of the game where the scorer
is allowed to lie once.  Figuring out which data to discard just adds a
dimension to the game.  I'm presuming that one error is more likely than two
errors.  If so, "white" seems to be the best bet.  If we assume "white" is
really a two, then "forte" is a plausible guess.
gelinas
response 501 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 04:54 UTC 2003

But white is more likely to be a three.

And guessing at random, I might actually end up 'it'.  ;)
janc
response 502 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 05:23 UTC 2003

white a three?  No way.  First, that assumes a bigger error on JEP's part.
Seconde, if white is 3 and --ate is 2 and whore is 1 then we are stuck with
??ite which contradicts another word (I forget which - scrolled of my screen),
so we'd have to assume yet another error.
gelinas
response 503 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 05:38 UTC 2003

But how else to account for the 1 throb got, when tanga got 0?  It's either

        -ha-e
or
        -hat-
or
        -h-te.

Or the scores are so wrong as to be useless.  And given

        1 ghats  (That was the score, wasn't it?)

I'm inclined toward 'useless'.
jep
response 504 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 13:33 UTC 2003

Unfortunately the storm hit after I logged off for the night.

0 exing jep
0 speed aruba
2 crate remmers
1 throb janc
0 crowd aruba
0 croon remmers
0 eking gelinas/lastword
1 tease remmers
1 blare remmers
2 white gelinas <-- my mistake, sorry!
0 tanga polytarp
1 ghats aruba
1 whore slynne
1 knave other
---
5 forte janc


I do apologize for the mistake.  Nice job by both other and gelinas to 
notice it.
janc
response 505 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 14:29 UTC 2003

Re 503:  You forgot --rte.

So, time for a new word...

forte 0 lastword
remmers
response 506 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 18:29 UTC 2003

piano

(Had to guess that...)
polytarp
response 507 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 20:57 UTC 2003

xylem
carson
response 508 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 22:57 UTC 2003

(errors are fascinating.)

error
gelinas
response 509 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 23:07 UTC 2003

So I did.  Thanks, Jan. :)
aruba
response 510 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 23:21 UTC 2003

steep
jep
response 511 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 02:49 UTC 2003

guess
janc
response 512 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 02:50 UTC 2003

Holy Mackeral!  Honestly, I was thinking of 'forte' as meaning a
person's strong point.  It never occured to me that my word had any
relation to the previous word.  But there it is, the shortest
five-letter game in history:

forte 0 lastword
piano 5 remmers

Now you know why we all agree with remmers - it's his amazing psychic
powers.
jep
response 513 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 04:47 UTC 2003

Wow.
mdw
response 514 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 06:35 UTC 2003

piano = soft
forte = loud
Sheet music is commonly marked with P and F for soft and loud (for some
reason, just as Latin was the official language for science and French
was the official language of diplomacy, Italian became the official
language for music.) A pianoforte is an obselete name for a keyboard
musical instrument that can play both softly and loudly, according to
how hard the keys are struck.  I sure don't see anything psychic in
remmers's guess.  I'd be more surprised if he didn't make that guess.
carson
response 515 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 06:42 UTC 2003

(it's not psychic.  Remmers is just exploiting the power of suggestion.)

mezzo
rcurl
response 516 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 07:21 UTC 2003

German became the official language for physical sciences. Latin led
only in taxonomy and anatomy. Of course, all such associations are
dependent upon time and place. 
remmers
response 517 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 12:52 UTC 2003

O-kaaay.....

I am thinking of a 5-letter word.

piano 0 (last word)
janc
response 518 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 13:35 UTC 2003

forte
carson
response 519 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 15:27 UTC 2003

mezzo
aruba
response 520 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 15:55 UTC 2003

easel
jep
response 521 of 1578: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 17:12 UTC 2003

re resp:518: Hahaha!

doubt
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   472-496   497-521   522-546   547-571   572-596   597-621   622-646   647-671 
 672-696   697-721   722-746   747-771   772-796   797-821   822-846   847-871   872-896 
 897-921   922-946   947-971   972-996   997-1021   1022-1046   1047-1071   1072-1096   1097-1121 
 1122-1146   1147-1171   1172-1196   1197-1221   1222-1246   1247-1271   1272-1296   1297-1321   1322-1346 
 1347-1371   1372-1396   1397-1421   1422-1446   1447-1471   1472-1496   1497-1521   1522-1546   1547-1571 
 1572-1578          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss