You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   24-48   49-73   74-98   99-123   124-148   149-173   174-198   199-223 
 224-236          
 
Author Message
25 new of 236 responses total.
keesan
response 49 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 18:51 UTC 2006

I second.  Other has already been on the board.  srw is probably going to
refuse as he is staff.  
tod
response 50 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 19:09 UTC 2006

re #48 and 49
 I think these members would be good on the board, so I hearby nominate
 them:

     jep
     jared
     eskarina
     other
     srw

I think it is odd to nominate people who don't participate in this conference.
Jared is the only participant and he hasn't been here since July....
See below:

Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part jep
 User jep not a member

Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part eskarina
 User eskarina not a member

Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part other
 User other not a member

Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part srw
 User srw not a member

Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options? part jared
     jared Wed Jul 26 19:51:22 2006 Jared Mauch
jep
response 51 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 20:21 UTC 2006

Heh.  I participate in the conference but only via Backtalk.

I decline the nomination but I appreciate the thought, remmers!
keesan
response 52 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 20:27 UTC 2006

user keesan not a member.  As far as I know I am a paid-up member and my
outgoing ssh still works.  
keesan
response 53 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 20:28 UTC 2006

user remmers not a member
kingjon
response 54 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 20:35 UTC 2006

The current list of members of Grex, to which I referred when making my
nominations, may be accessed by running the UNIX commands "member" or "members"
("member" pipes through a pager, while "members" is suitable for piping through
grep, say). The BBS command "part" only shows which users have posted in this
conference -- not a reliable indicator of membership, since some members may
not read coop, and we allow anyone to post here regardless of membership.

keesan
response 55 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 22:07 UTC 2006

So why does 'part' say that keesan and remmers are not members?
gelinas
response 56 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 00:54 UTC 2006

No idea:

} Ok: part keesan
} 
}    loginid        last time on      name
} 
}     keesan Wed Nov 15 17:12:30 2006 Sindi Keesan
} 
} 1 participant total.
} 
} Ok:

kingjon
response 57 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 02:17 UTC 2006

#55: As I say in #54, the "part" command -- built into Picospan, mind -- tells
you about "participants" in a conference, i.e. those who have posted responses.

steve
response 58 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 03:18 UTC 2006

   I accept the nomination to run for the board.

   I nominate Glenda Andre'.
steve
response 59 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 03:21 UTC 2006

  I nominate Marcus Watts.
mdw
response 60 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 03:34 UTC 2006

I accept.
glenda
response 61 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 04:11 UTC 2006

I accept.
keesan
response 62 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 04:52 UTC 2006

I second the last two nominations.  Don't you need to be seconded before you
can accept?
tod
response 63 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 06:40 UTC 2006

i nominate keesan and kingjon
nharmon
response 64 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 13:56 UTC 2006

I nominate Dick Devos.
keesan
response 65 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:11 UTC 2006

It is too late to nominate us and besides we were both already nominated and
declined.  Or maybe your 1:40 posting reflects Ann Arbor and not your local
time.  Thanks anyway.  My seconding was 8 minutes before the deadline.
nharmon
response 66 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:31 UTC 2006

I nominate John Kerry.
jep
response 67 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 19:57 UTC 2006

You don't need to be nominated or seconded to run for the Board of
Cyberspace.  You merely need to indicate you are willing to run.
tod
response 68 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 21:52 UTC 2006

re #64
I'm in Seattle so yea..I posted it 3 hours previous to the timestamp.
other
response 69 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 06:41 UTC 2006

I'm surprised I don't show up as a participant, but that may be because
I only use the web interface for conferencing.  In any case, I
appreciate the nomination, but I'm inclined to decline.
spooked
response 70 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 11:08 UTC 2006

The part command is not working correctly.
spooked
response 71 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 11:09 UTC 2006

e.g. I'm not a participant (still).
naftee
response 72 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 00:47 UTC 2006

i nominate nate harmon
nharmon
response 73 of 236: Mark Unseen   Nov 18 14:45 UTC 2006

Thanks Brett, but I have already declined.
 0-24   24-48   49-73   74-98   99-123   124-148   149-173   174-198   199-223 
 224-236          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss