You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 429-453   454-478   479-503   504-528   529-553   554-578   579-603   604-610   
 
Author Message
25 new of 610 responses total.
lilmo
response 454 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 21 21:09 UTC 1999

No, but close enuf, since I'm getting tired of not being able to guess.  It
was actually Powerade.  Your turn, gypsi!
gypsi
response 455 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 01:52 UTC 1999

<raises eyebrow>  Ummm...okay.  =)
gypsi
response 456 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 01:57 UTC 1999

Serving size: 1/4 cup (36g/1.3oz)
Servings per container: about 6

Calories 150
Calories from Fat  35

Total Fat: 4g
Saturated Fat: 2g
Cholesterol: 0mg
Sodium:  270mg
Total Carbohydrate: 26g
Dietary Fiber: 2g
Sugars: 10g
Protein: 2g

Vitamin A: 0%
Vitamin C: 0%
Calcium: 4%
Iron: 6%
omni
response 457 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 07:41 UTC 1999

  Haagen Dazs?
remmers
response 458 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 10:36 UTC 1999

Hm... Cholesterol content is zero and fiber is non-zero.  This suggests
it's not a dairy product, like ice cream.  It packs a lot of
carbohydrate and sugar into 1/4 cup.  Maybe some highly concentrated
cereal product.
gypsi
response 459 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 20:07 UTC 1999

Not Haagen Dazs, not highly concentrated cereal product...but that's kinda
on the right track...
keesan
response 460 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 24 16:34 UTC 1999

What is Powerade?
lilmo
response 461 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 25 01:40 UTC 1999

Coke's version of Gatorade.  It comes in a handy squirt bottle with a valve
in the cap (so it doesn't leak) and a hinged top over that.

Hmm... no Vit A or C, so not a yellow or green veggie, nor likely a fruit,
but fiber indicates that it's not likely to be meat, either.  Is it some kind
of nut? that seems to fit the fiber, iron, and protein.
gypsi
response 462 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 30 07:27 UTC 1999

Nope.  Not a beverage, and not a nut.

Hint:  Yes, you can use it for a breakfast food, but it isn't a food itself.
i
response 463 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 30 23:52 UTC 1999

Some kind of spread?
<i is unsure about "it isn't a food itself">
gypsi
response 464 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 04:06 UTC 1999

Meaning I don't know anyone who would eat it.

Not a spread.  Think internally...as in ingredient...
lilmo
response 465 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 18:07 UTC 1999

Is is a shake mix?  (eg, carnation instant b'fast or SlimFast)
gypsi
response 466 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 19:35 UTC 1999

That is so close I could scream.  =)  "Mix" is correct...now gimme a popular
brand name for mixes.  Think coffee cake and muffins.
happyboy
response 467 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 22:17 UTC 1999

jiffy mix?
i
response 468 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 1 22:59 UTC 1999

Shake & Bake!!!     :)
keesan
response 469 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 2 03:38 UTC 1999

Bisquick.  I remember doughboys for breakfast at summer camp.  Freshly picked
blueberries and raw dough, we never could wait for them to char on the stick.
gypsi
response 470 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 2 03:59 UTC 1999

Happyboy has it!  =)
happyboy
response 471 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 3 01:50 UTC 1999

cool...i feel like the fonz!
ok...

corn syrup, dextrose, high fructose corn syrup, crackermeal,
modified wheat starch, partially hydrogenated soybean oil,
dried strawberries, natural berry flavor, dried apples, citric
acid, xanthan gum, red #40, soy lecithin, blue #2

hint: the ingredients listed are only *part* of the product
      AND you need not name the *exact* subspecies of this
      cheerful beast.
gypsi
response 472 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 3 03:30 UTC 1999

Nutri-Grain Fruit Twists?
happyboy
response 473 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 3 20:27 UTC 1999

that's a negatory, mama-bear.
gelinas
response 474 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 03:27 UTC 1999

Well, except that it's crackermeal instead of flour, I'd say it sounds
like a Pop Tart.
keesan
response 475 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 14:53 UTC 1999

Did the rules of the game just change from listing nutritional content to
listing actual ingredients?
omni
response 476 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 4 15:04 UTC 1999

 I don't think so, but maybe some people just don't understand the rules of
the game.
keesan
response 477 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 5 00:24 UTC 1999

I don't mind playing by different rules for a change, except that makes it
impossible to list any 'food' that does not consist of multiple ingredients.
For instance I could not enter a tomato, only tomato sauce or pizza.
happyboy
response 478 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 01:45 UTC 1999

r474 gelinas...EXACTAMUNDO!  you GOT IT!
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 429-453   454-478   479-503   504-528   529-553   554-578   579-603   604-610   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss