You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   19-43   44-67        
 
Author Message
24 new of 67 responses total.
bhelliom
response 44 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 30 19:11 UTC 2005

Richard, he's only trying to bait you.

klg: did it ever occur to you that some banks have that kind of policy?
 Can you refrain from being an ass for at least five minutes?

I can't believe I'm defending Richard.
rcurl
response 45 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 30 23:05 UTC 2005

Am  I correct in concluding that someone *cannot* debit your checking account
unless a) you give them permission to do so or, b) they commit fraud?
mary
response 46 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:18 UTC 2005

The social security administration will go back into an account to which 
they've deposited funds and remove those funds if they later find out the 
person died the day before the deposit.  Happened in our family.
nharmon
response 47 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:28 UTC 2005

Rane, I am pretty sure you are correct. The information you give someone
for an ACH credit (account number and routing number) are the same as
you would give someone for an ACH debit. However, authorizing someone to
make an ACH credit does not give him/her authorization to debit. There
may be exceptions for fixing mistakes. 
tod
response 48 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:29 UTC 2005

That's why you should always keep the body in a closet for a few weeks.
bhoward
response 49 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:40 UTC 2005

Why stop there.  They sell large freezers and most homes in Michigan
seem to have basements.  You could probably keep the checks flowing
for years as long as you pay your electric bill on time.
tod
response 50 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 00:47 UTC 2005

And probably keep that senior discount for the utilities!
marcvh
response 51 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 01:18 UTC 2005

There's a third category other than fraud, which is "error."  And in
practice it's often impossible to distinguish between fraud and error,
one of the many reasons why prosecution for fraud isn't common.

I have heard reports that if you owe somebody money (e.g. a debt
collection agency) and they get your account info somehow (e.g. from a
check you send them) then they can yank the money out of our account
without your consent, and as long as you really do owe the money the
transaction will be upheld.  I haven't attempted to dig too deeply into
the set of circumstances in which this may be done, since it's unlikely
to apply to me.
klg
response 52 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 02:31 UTC 2005

Here's your LIE, you LYING LIAR:  "Another reason might be that not all
young folks have checking accounts.  You need one for direct deposit."

I know for a fact that you don't need a checking account for direct
deposit.

When my dept. erroneously sends funds to a person's bank account, we can
request, via our bank, that the funds be returned to us.  Some banks
will make the withdrawal if sufficient funds remain in the account.
Others won't.
richard
response 53 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 02:38 UTC 2005

klg I wasn't LYING.  I simply should have said "you need a checking 
account OR a savings account"  Leaving out a fact isn't lying, which is 
defined as intentionally saying a deliberate mistruth.  It is simply 
UNintentionally not stating the full information.  

Which you know, so you are still lying when you say I am lying. 
marcvh
response 54 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 02:40 UTC 2005

Sounds like your department makes such errors often.
bhelliom
response 55 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 03:00 UTC 2005

Richard, don't be a twit.  Klg is going through the effort of pissing
you off, which isn't hard, apparently.
klg
response 56 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 03:20 UTC 2005

The LYING LIAR can't STOP his LYING LIES.

Contrary to what you said, one DOES NOT NEED a CHECKING ACCOUNT to have
DIRECT DEPOSIT.


No vANhEYNINGEN.  Such errors are rare, and generally caused by (1) the
incorrect data input of account numbers  by the service company that
does it for us or (2) failure of the recipients survivors to provide
timely notificatio to the service company of the recipient's death or
(3) the death of the recipient after the payment file has been
transmitted to the bank.
scooterlibby
response 57 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 03:35 UTC 2005

When will these naive liberals ever learn?  They'll never get their way
until they learn to lie as good as us republicans.
cyklone
response 58 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 04:01 UTC 2005

Admit it, kludgie, that "faith-based" accounting system your department is 
using just isn't working out.
nharmon
response 59 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 15:01 UTC 2005

klg, nobody likes an asshole.
bhelliom
response 60 of 67: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 19:57 UTC 2005

Except their own, and those don't talk nearly as much.
bru
response 61 of 67: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 22:13 UTC 2006

i prefer direct deposit
bru
response 62 of 67: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 22:14 UTC 2006

!party
bru
response 63 of 67: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 22:16 UTC 2006

well that dldnt work.
edina
response 64 of 67: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 04:46 UTC 2006

No, but it was more pleasurable that klg and richard.
naftee
response 65 of 67: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 01:19 UTC 2006

I bet it gave you an orgasm.
tsty
response 66 of 67: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 16:17 UTC 2006

i thought that an unauthorized withdrawal from TCF was fixed.
  
wrong - big fight now, dammit.
  
seems like neither the bank nor visa  gives a rat's ass anymore.
  
wilt
response 67 of 67: Mark Unseen   May 16 23:51 UTC 2006

HACKED BY GNAA LOL JEWS DID WTC LOL
 0-24   19-43   44-67        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss