|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 680 responses total. |
orinoco
|
|
response 402 of 680:
| 
Dec 31 02:57 UTC 1997 |
Does this item have it's own mind?
|
snowth
|
|
response 403 of 680:
|
Dec 31 03:47 UTC 1997 |
Isn't it obvious from my response, that it not only hs *one* mind, but
several?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 404 of 680:
|
Dec 31 16:50 UTC 1997 |
Would that make it a symbiotic entity?
|
carson
|
|
response 405 of 680:
|
Dec 31 21:09 UTC 1997 |
(wouldn't it be a parasitic entity?)
|
snowth
|
|
response 406 of 680:
|
Jan 1 08:29 UTC 1998 |
Isn't this discussion getting just a tad bit too geeky for it's own good?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 407 of 680:
|
Jan 2 15:51 UTC 1998 |
Are you accusing me of being geeky again?
|
lilmo
|
|
response 408 of 680:
|
Jan 3 19:58 UTC 1998 |
Who let in the Trill?.
|
bikeman
|
|
response 409 of 680:
|
Jan 4 06:59 UTC 1998 |
Isn't a trill when you quickly move between 2 notes on an instrument?
|
snowth
|
|
response 410 of 680:
|
Jan 4 11:50 UTC 1998 |
Do we care?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 411 of 680:
|
Jan 5 03:18 UTC 1998 |
How can you not care about trills?
|
lilmo
|
|
response 412 of 680:
|
Jan 5 20:37 UTC 1998 |
Is no one else here a Star Trek fan?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 413 of 680:
|
Jan 5 21:02 UTC 1998 |
Would you hate me if I said I didn't?
|
carson
|
|
response 414 of 680:
|
Jan 6 18:22 UTC 1998 |
(do you think that I wouldn't make you suffer at the hands [so to speak]
of the terrible Tribbles?)
|
snowth
|
|
response 415 of 680:
|
Jan 6 19:53 UTC 1998 |
what hands?
|
diznave
|
|
response 416 of 680:
|
Jan 6 23:40 UTC 1998 |
Can you believe that in between semesters, they close the computer labs? So,
Dan, they're not still picking on you, are they? Sean, do you play any
instruments?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 417 of 680:
|
Jan 9 00:27 UTC 1998 |
(Can you belive this guy? Actually trying to have a coherent conversation,
is he? Isn't it shocking?!)
|
carson
|
|
response 418 of 680:
|
Jan 10 01:13 UTC 1998 |
(can you believe this guy, swiping my parentheses?)
|
bikeman
|
|
response 419 of 680:
|
Jan 11 02:11 UTC 1998 |
Is it even possible to have a conversation in ANY of these confrences?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 420 of 680:
|
Jan 11 02:36 UTC 1998 |
How dare you accuse me of swiping 'your' parentheses? Just because you use
parentheses for everything, does that mean the rest of us cannot make the
occasional honest parenthetical remark?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 421 of 680:
|
Jan 12 02:32 UTC 1998 |
Can't we all just get along?
|
carson
|
|
response 422 of 680:
|
Jan 12 19:09 UTC 1998 |
(what should I use for a parenthetical remark?)
|
lilmo
|
|
response 423 of 680:
|
Jan 13 01:46 UTC 1998 |
Shouldn't you use parentheses?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 424 of 680:
|
Jan 13 03:28 UTC 1998 |
Would double parentheses ((like these)) perhaps be in order?
|
carson
|
|
response 425 of 680:
|
Jan 14 01:39 UTC 1998 |
[can I give up now? please?]
|
lilmo
|
|
response 426 of 680:
|
Jan 15 22:17 UTC 1998 |
Should we let him?
|