|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 680 responses total. |
snowth
|
|
response 375 of 680:
| 
Dec 7 18:17 UTC 1997 |
Pseudonyms? Snowth has pseudonyms? Does she know about this? Shouldn't
somebody inform her of this?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 376 of 680:
|
Dec 8 22:33 UTC 1997 |
Shouldn't she have been paying a bit more attention?
What's with this third person business anyway?
|
m588
|
|
response 377 of 680:
|
Dec 9 01:06 UTC 1997 |
how long will this game continue
|
orinoco
|
|
response 378 of 680:
|
Dec 10 22:47 UTC 1997 |
Shouldn't there have been a question mark after that post?
(Is Terry new to grex? Is that why I haven't seen this particular login
before? Should I be giving the traditional welcome to Terry?)
|
snowth
|
|
response 379 of 680:
|
Dec 10 22:52 UTC 1997 |
Isn't there a trademark on that?
|
lilmo
|
|
response 380 of 680:
|
Dec 12 04:39 UTC 1997 |
A trademark on what?
|
snowth
|
|
response 381 of 680:
|
Dec 12 21:33 UTC 1997 |
What do you think? Don't you think that if I had any clue what I was talking
about, I would specify?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 382 of 680:
|
Dec 12 23:23 UTC 1997 |
Do you mean to say you've never heard the sacred incantation, 'it gets easier
(tm)' ?
|
snowth
|
|
response 383 of 680:
|
Dec 14 05:00 UTC 1997 |
Isn't that what I just said?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 384 of 680:
|
Dec 14 18:39 UTC 1997 |
Do you realize how impeccable your timing was with that last response?
|
snowth
|
|
response 385 of 680:
|
Dec 16 04:06 UTC 1997 |
Isn't that just futher proof that I'm secretly breaking out?
|
lilmo
|
|
response 386 of 680:
|
Dec 17 02:13 UTC 1997 |
breaking out of what?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 387 of 680:
|
Dec 17 23:30 UTC 1997 |
Prison, perhaps?
|
snowth
|
|
response 388 of 680:
|
Dec 21 08:38 UTC 1997 |
What do you think I could be implying by that statement? Wouldn't that explain
all my recent headaches?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 389 of 680:
|
Dec 22 17:44 UTC 1997 |
Do you realize that most people wouldn't catch that reference? Could it be
that not all of us are as obsessive as you?
|
snowth
|
|
response 390 of 680:
|
Dec 23 03:14 UTC 1997 |
Didn't you get it though? Don't you think it's likely that I'm actually
looking for others like myself who *understand* the obsessiveness? Who says
they can't be lurking here *right now* waiting for another one to show her
face?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 391 of 680:
|
Dec 24 18:17 UTC 1997 |
Do you really think that's very likely?
|
snowth
|
|
response 392 of 680:
|
Dec 25 01:01 UTC 1997 |
Isn't it worth a shot?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 393 of 680:
|
Dec 25 03:38 UTC 1997 |
Are you implying that violence is the answer?
|
snowth
|
|
response 394 of 680:
|
Dec 25 06:52 UTC 1997 |
Doesn't violence include killing someone? Do you think this is a bad thing?
|
lilmo
|
|
response 395 of 680:
|
Dec 27 21:46 UTC 1997 |
Why would violence include killing? Is it not violent to just hit someone?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 396 of 680:
|
Dec 28 03:18 UTC 1997 |
Does that mean hitting people is a good thing?
|
snowth
|
|
response 397 of 680:
|
Dec 28 11:56 UTC 1997 |
Why is hitting people normally considered a bad thing and hitting *on* people
a varied thing?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 398 of 680:
|
Dec 29 16:57 UTC 1997 |
Does that imply that beating around the bush is a form of vegephilia?
|
bikeman
|
|
response 399 of 680:
|
Dec 30 07:24 UTC 1997 |
May I ask what kind of bush you are beating around?
How many of you have a vulgar mind like me and would take that last question
as a vuglar question? (:P
|