|
Grex > Oldcoop > #75: Member Initative: Restore the Murdered Items | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 424 responses total. |
albaugh
|
|
response 355 of 424:
| 
Feb 3 20:45 UTC 2004 |
Quoting someone, with full attribution, isn't going to be deemed copyright
infringement to begin with.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 356 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:49 UTC 2004 |
Re. 354: According to 352, you already know jp2 owns it.
|
jp2
|
|
response 357 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:54 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 358 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:59 UTC 2004 |
Prove it...
|
gelinas
|
|
response 359 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:06 UTC 2004 |
jp2 really do *not* want this resolved in his favour. If it is, then
there is another can of worms opened: how to track down all of the other
copies of his words that exist on the Internet. Of course, it is not _his_
problem to track down all the copies of the baby-diary and divorce items,
but it becomes attractive to some to try.
While parody is protected, I wonder how much was directly quoted in m-net's
parody conference, and what relation the quotations bear to the totality
of the original work.
This really isn't something you want to start, jp2.
|
jp2
|
|
response 360 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:24 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 361 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:31 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 362 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:54 UTC 2004 |
(this is coop, not agora).
|
jp2
|
|
response 363 of 424:
|
Feb 4 11:07 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 364 of 424:
|
Feb 4 14:16 UTC 2004 |
HEY DIDSOMEONE METION THE DMCA?
|
remmers
|
|
response 365 of 424:
|
Feb 4 17:12 UTC 2004 |
As long as we're mentioning things, somebody should mention "fair
use", which I believe #344 to be.
|
jp2
|
|
response 366 of 424:
|
Feb 4 18:18 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jep
|
|
response 367 of 424:
|
Feb 4 18:32 UTC 2004 |
It's a paragraph, Jamie.
It was quoted directly, in context, from a public site, and with the
intention of conveying information relevant to an ongoing policy
discussion.
But by all means, take legal action if you find it necessary. Please.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 368 of 424:
|
Feb 4 18:50 UTC 2004 |
What about the fair use rights of people who posted in your item?
|
jp2
|
|
response 369 of 424:
|
Feb 4 19:09 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 370 of 424:
|
Feb 4 19:13 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 371 of 424:
|
Feb 4 21:21 UTC 2004 |
LOOK WHO"S TALKING, MR " I HAVE THE TIME TO TRY TO BAN ALL OF CANADA FROM
ARBORNET YET WON'T GET OFF MY ASS TO PURSUE A LOUSY LITIGATION" . HAHA YOU"RE
WORSE THAN TWINKIEASS.
|
jp2
|
|
response 372 of 424:
|
Feb 5 16:37 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 373 of 424:
|
Feb 5 18:50 UTC 2004 |
Presumably, ten days and around three hours after it began. If
you're going to take us to task for not specifically allowing for
the voting period to fluctuate for purposes of convenience in the
by-laws, then you're wasting your time. If you think it's a
problem, propose an amendment to solve it.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 374 of 424:
|
Feb 5 18:52 UTC 2004 |
As the motd says / alludes to, end of the day Feb. 7 (i.e. 11:59.999...pm ET)
|
jp2
|
|
response 375 of 424:
|
Feb 5 19:02 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 376 of 424:
|
Feb 5 19:13 UTC 2004 |
The Treasuerer cannot check the mailbox on Saturday, to see who might have
joined that day. So the results cannot be certified before Monday.
Reporting tentative results before the membership list is certified
compromises the secret ballot, by allowing of 'traffic analysis.'
|
jp2
|
|
response 377 of 424:
|
Feb 5 19:24 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 378 of 424:
|
Feb 6 00:00 UTC 2004 |
re 374 Not exactly; a day is really only 23 hours and 56 minutes long
(approx).
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 379 of 424:
|
Feb 6 04:28 UTC 2004 |
Except if you're moving.
|