|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 5 new of 38 responses total. |
dbratman
|
|
response 34 of 38:
| 
Jan 17 03:24 UTC 2001 |
With a birthdate of 1727, Hertel was close in age to Haydn, and of a
very different generation to Bach. (By the time Bach died, in 1750,
Baroque music was already considered quaint and old-fashioned.) But I
don't know his music and can't say more of him than that.
|
krj
|
|
response 35 of 38:
|
Jan 17 04:29 UTC 2001 |
Yeah, Leslie pointed that out, and she says it's Classical in sound.
Never trust anything you read on the Internet.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 36 of 38:
|
Jan 17 11:59 UTC 2001 |
including resp: 35 ? ;)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 37 of 38:
|
Jan 18 03:38 UTC 2001 |
Especially response 35.
|
dbratman
|
|
response 38 of 38:
|
Jan 18 21:21 UTC 2001 |
Ba-dum. Very early Haydn (before 1760) can still have a faintly
Baroquish tinge to it, especially to the untutored ear. Could apply to
Hertel, depending on when he wrote what you heard.
|
