You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   8-32   33-57   58-82   83-107   108-132   133-154    
 
Author Message
25 new of 154 responses total.
scg
response 33 of 154: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 02:00 UTC 1998

The problem with that method (if I understand it correctly without doing all
the math involved) is that it goes to average usage, while what matters is
peak usage.  If we have 100 users, all of whom spend 1/10 of every day on
line, then if they all spread their usage out evenly, 10 or 11 lines might
be enough to not have busy signals.  If all 100 want to connect at the same
time, we will need lines to accomodate them.  I suspect we're at neither
extreme.

If we were a business, with the main goal of keeping our customers happy, we
would want to guarantee that there wouldn't be any busy signals.  That would
mean that if there were some time of day when 50% of our customers were on
line, we would want enough modems to accomodate 50% of the customers at once,
without a problem.  We're a non-profit chairity, providing a free public
service.  Our goal can't be to provide the best service around, because it
just isn't possible given our resources (ok, maybe it is, but that would
reflect badly on the commercial services rather than particularly well on us).
What we need to do is figure out how we can best serve our mission of
providing access to everything that Grex is while living within our shoestring
financial limitations.  Given that, the occasional busy signal is ok.  The
question we have to answer is how long is it acceptable for it to take for
somebody to get through.  15 minutes very occasionally is probably ok,
especially since it hopefully won't be the same person hitting the busy
signals every month.  I'm not sure if five minutes a day would be acceptable
or not.  If it's always the same people gettin gthe busy signals, I suspect
it isn't.  If it's different people different days, which it probably would
be, we can probably live with it.
mary
response 34 of 154: Mark Unseen   Oct 7 13:20 UTC 1998

Er, my percentage formula called for only looking
at peak use time.  

I agree with your entire second paragraph.
rtgreen
response 35 of 154: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 05:47 UTC 1998

Mary and Steve: You're both right, sort of.  Mary's formula would yield
the average use during the peak hours.  ;-)

I, too, like the second paragraph.  We're on the right track here.  In my
thinking, the number of incidents of a busy signal is much less important
than the duration of an incident.  If each incident is only a minute, I
think we could tolerate them every hour, but if each incident were fifteen
minutes, I would get worried if it happened more than once a day.

I haven't looked recently. What does qgraph tell us for the past two
months?  Is it realistic to look at July & August as typical, with
vacations giving people more time to grex, or leave town and not grex?
janc
response 36 of 154: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 20:45 UTC 1998

I kludged up my dialup usage program to make it possible to skip over
mangled parts of the wtmp file.  I was able to get August data, and
data for the current month, but September was kind of chewed up.  I'm
not 100% confident of this data.  But here it is:

Usage between Sat Aug  1 00:00:00 1998 and Mon Aug 31 23:59:59 1998
of IP addresses: 204.212.46.131

     LINES    HOURS    PERCENTAGE
      0:     131.54      17.68%
      1:      82.23      11.05%
      2:     104.12      13.99%
      3:     101.13      13.59%
      4:      93.41      12.55%
      5:      77.11      10.36%
      6:      55.66       7.48%
      7:      38.16       5.12%
      8:      28.64       3.84%
      9:      15.23       2.04%
     10:       8.38       1.12%
     11:       4.91        .65%
     12:       2.46        .33%
     13:       1.02        .13%
    
    TOTAL    744.00     100.00%

    Average number of lines in use: 3.36



Usage between Thu Oct  1 00:00:00 1998 and Wed Oct 28 15:07:48 EST 1998
of IP addresses: 204.212.46.131

     LINES    HOURS    PERCENTAGE
      0:      29.46      4.43%
      1:      94.28     14.19%
      2:     113.62     17.10%
      3:     121.61     18.31%
      4:     108.76     16.37%
      5:      83.13     12.51%
      6:      52.55      7.91%
      7:      30.95      4.66%
      8:      15.92      2.39%
      9:       8.09      1.21%
     10:       3.86       .58%
     11:       1.38       .20%
     12:       0.39       .05%
     13:       0.10       .01%

    TOTAL:   664.10    100.00%

    Average number of lines in use: 3.5068

Mark is also working on generating some data, and Scott should be able to
get some from the terminal servers.  Personally, I think we can drop two
lines, and should certainly drop one.
janc
response 37 of 154: Mark Unseen   Oct 28 21:06 UTC 1998

Here are some snapshots of who was on the dialin when 13 people were dialed
on this month:

--USER-- --LINE--   --------SINCE---------
    sixx    ttyqa   Tue Oct  6 19:44:08 1998
 pthomas    ttyuc   Tue Oct  6 19:48:15 1998
wrestler    ttytd   Tue Oct  6 19:54:07 1998
     jor    ttyp5   Tue Oct  6 19:16:12 1998
   aruba    ttys3   Tue Oct  6 18:34:39 1998
zeroacid    ttyrf   Tue Oct  6 19:08:04 1998
happyboy    ttyq7   Tue Oct  6 19:43:57 1998
  bookie    ttys8   Tue Oct  6 19:52:51 1998
     kme    ttyr6   Tue Oct  6 18:29:06 1998
  tiyose    ttyse   Tue Oct  6 19:25:34 1998
   acorn    ttyt2   Tue Oct  6 18:34:02 1998
 headdoc    ttyq6   Tue Oct  6 19:44:28 1998
   benni    ttyud   Tue Oct  6 19:54:23 1998

--USER-- --LINE--   --------SINCE---------
  bookie    ttypb   Tue Oct  6 22:49:06 1998
   acorn    ttytb   Tue Oct  6 22:41:48 1998
dpfitzen    ttyue   Tue Oct  6 22:12:33 1998
  sekari    ttype   Tue Oct  6 22:28:51 1998
lbmiller    ttyqe   Tue Oct  6 22:42:16 1998
morpheus    ttyqb   Tue Oct  6 22:49:51 1998
 gabriel    ttyr1   Tue Oct  6 22:37:24 1998
   suzie    ttyua   Tue Oct  6 22:26:48 1998
    russ    ttyrf   Tue Oct  6 22:44:36 1998
     kme    ttyr6   Tue Oct  6 18:29:06 1998
  eeyore    ttyp7   Tue Oct  6 22:49:56 1998
     jbo    ttys5   Tue Oct  6 22:50:46 1998
   ricke    ttyp9   Tue Oct  6 22:50:49 1998

--USER-- --LINE--   --------SINCE---------
dpfitzen    ttyp4   Sun Oct 18 20:27:32 1998
traveler    ttyp2   Sun Oct 18 20:21:09 1998
lbmiller    ttyp5   Sun Oct 18 20:28:56 1998
   other    ttyq7   Sun Oct 18 19:56:56 1998
     krj    ttyq1   Sun Oct 18 20:14:22 1998
 snookie    ttys7   Sun Oct 18 20:28:45 1998
   aruba    ttyq2   Sun Oct 18 20:21:22 1998
 kharder    ttyua   Sun Oct 18 20:02:10 1998
 mermaid    ttyuf   Sun Oct 18 20:07:28 1998
     hmv    ttyub   Sun Oct 18 20:20:03 1998
  laotzu    ttys2   Sun Oct 18 20:27:57 1998
 illogic    ttysf   Sun Oct 18 20:09:00 1998
  dsmith    ttyu8   Sun Oct 18 20:08:13 1998

--USER-- --LINE--   ----------SINCE----------
    mary    ttys0   Thu Oct 22 21:26:53 1998
   acorn    ttyt9   Thu Oct 22 21:28:20 1998
  eeyore    ttypb   Thu Oct 22 21:12:48 1998
    sixx    ttyq6   Thu Oct 22 21:28:35 1998
   senna    ttyp5   Thu Oct 22 21:28:41 1998
    thea    ttyr4   Thu Oct 22 21:07:13 1998
   n8rxs    ttyr8   Thu Oct 22 20:40:16 1998
    imax    ttyp1   Thu Oct 22 21:31:09 1998
    indi    ttyrc   Thu Oct 22 21:18:12 1998
ckallery    ttyqc   Thu Oct 22 20:34:06 1998
 kharder    ttys5   Thu Oct 22 21:34:38 1998
   mrmat    ttys3   Thu Oct 22 21:17:07 1998
 orinoco    ttyrd   Thu Oct 22 21:32:05 1998

I don't think aruba uses the staff dialin, and I'm sure none of the others
do, so I think this means we were full with regular users, and anyone else
dialing in during the 6 minutes in October that these cover would have
gotten a busy tone.  If we cut one line, we'd probably have had a bit more
than 35 minutes of busy tones this month.

Unless other people get data that looks much difference, my inclination would
be to cut just one dialin.
aruba
response 38 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 3 19:40 UTC 1998

I called  Ameritech today and had them drop the last two lines in our trunk  
hunt, per  the board's vote last Wednesday.  See the minutes for details.
janc
response 39 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 6 05:19 UTC 1999

At the last board meeting, Mark reminded me that I once wrote a program
that measures dialin line use.  I happened to find it today, and ran it:

    August: 
 NUMBER   TOTAL
OF LINES  HOURS  PERCENT
  0:     111.53   14.99
  1:     141.76   19.05
  2:     146.90   19.74
  3:     124.61   16.74
  4:      94.99   12.77
  5:      60.64    8.15
  6:      32.91    4.42
  7:      17.04    2.29
  8:       8.73    1.17
  9:       3.81    0.51
 10:       0.90    0.12
 11:       0.19    0.03

    September:
 NUMBER   TOTAL
OF LINES  HOURS  PERCENT
  0:      81.64   11.34
  1:     167.46   23.26
  2:     176.80   24.56
  3:     126.28   17.54
  4:      82.78   11.50
  5:      45.93    6.38
  6:      22.25    3.09
  7:      10.65    1.48
  8:       4.18    0.58
  9:       1.57    0.21
 10:       0.45    0.06

    October: 
 NUMBER   TOTAL
OF LINES  HOURS  PERCENT
  0:     101.93   13.70
  1:     162.66   21.86
  2:     178.22   23.95
  3:     124.79   16.77
  4:      86.01   11.56
  5:      46.84    6.29
  6:      25.89    3.48
  7:      12.07    1.62
  8:       4.82    0.65
  9:       1.46    0.20
 10:       0.28    0.04
 11:       0.02    0.00
scg
response 40 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 6 05:22 UTC 1999

So it looks like our last line's barely in use.  In theory we could cut it.
The same could probably be said for the last four or so lines.

However, one thing I've noticed at work is that dial-in line usage goes way
up as the weather outside gets colder.  I'm not sure if that applies to Grex
or not, but it makes sense that it would.  It will be interesting to see if
usage of Grex's dial-ins picks up over the winter.
gelinas
response 41 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 6 06:00 UTC 1999

Yes, it will.  When first reading Jan's stats, my thought was to reduce
to 8 or 9 lines.  After reading the text and responses, I'd say dropping
to 9 would be reasonable.
other
response 42 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 6 06:22 UTC 1999

since dropping doesn't cost, but adding does, i would prefer to see drops done
at a rate of no more than one per month, just to allow time to reassess.
don
response 43 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 6 23:13 UTC 1999

How much is each line costing us per month now? I don't think it would be that
much compared to the profits/losses per month.
scott
response 44 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 00:33 UTC 1999

Each line is about $20/mo?  That tends to add up pretty fast.
gelinas
response 45 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 01:37 UTC 1999

I just realised that my first sentence in #41 is ambiguous.  The pronoun
refers to "interesting", not to dial-in usage.  I've no opinion of what
will happen to dial-in usage.
aruba
response 46 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 16:07 UTC 1999

Cutting a phone line would save us approximately $18.81 per month.
remmers
response 47 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 17:51 UTC 1999

And $18 is equivalent to three monthly memberships.  That's a
significant amount. 

I agree with Eric that we shouldn't drop more than one line at once,
and should allow time to assess the consequences before making
further decisions.  Line 11 is definitely a candidate for removal
if low usage continues during the cold weather months.
kaplan
response 48 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 01:54 UTC 1999

How much would it cost to reconnect one?

I'd say users would barely notice if get rid of two or three lines 
based on Jan's numbers.  We're not running a business here where people 
will  take their money elsewhere at the first busy signal.  I think 
most of our users will tolerate dialing back in again later if they get 
busy signals.
aruba
response 49 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 10 15:08 UTC 1999

I believe it costs $42 (plus tax) to install a new line.  At least that was
the price last time we did so.
i
response 50 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 02:09 UTC 1999

Ameritech has periodic "free installation" sales if we could wait to
do the reinstall.
davel
response 51 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 03:17 UTC 1999

I sort of thought those were just for residential customers.
pfv
response 52 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 04:45 UTC 1999

They also aren't "free" - tried that once and the 
miserable SOBS hid payments in the next billings.
aruba
response 53 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 11 15:35 UTC 1999

Grex took advantage of a free installation sale once in the past.  I haven't
heard about any recently, though.
keesan
response 54 of 154: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 02:05 UTC 1999

I dial in often and have not gotten a busy line for several months, but used
to get one a few times a month last spring.  It was not a problem and I could
stand busy lines twice as often as before.  Which times of day have the
highest dial-in usage?  I get the impression around 11 am, 4 pm, 8 pm.
scott
response 55 of 154: Mark Unseen   May 12 23:42 UTC 2000

I think it's time to do another serious evaluation of phone lines.

I've recently noticed that local modem useage is much lower than it used to
be.  Didn't Jan have a way to really nail down modem stats?  The "qgraph"
program Valerie wrote (which is a little less accurate) indicates very low
modem use.

I'm not advocating cutting off all modems (standard disclaimer), but it seems
like modem use has dropped off quite a bit.  With the new Internet
connectivity issue, we probably need to see if we're paying for too many modem
lines.
janc
response 56 of 154: Mark Unseen   May 13 05:16 UTC 2000

Hmm...the recent restart of the wtmp file is confusing my program a
bit.  I can run it on the days since that:

 Usage between Sat Apr 29 00:00:00 2000 and Fri May 12 23:59:59 2000
 of IP address: 204.212.46.132
  users    hours    percentage
   0:      95.89      28.54%
   1:     105.99      31.54%
   2:      75.23      22.39%
   3:      37.14      11.05%
   4:      15.20       4.52%
   5:       4.81       1.43%
   6:       0.86       0.26%
   7:       0.45       0.13%
   8:       0.08       0.02%

This covers only a two week period though.  I'll fiddle with the program
a bit and see if I can get the data for a longer period.
i
response 57 of 154: Mark Unseen   May 13 13:22 UTC 2000

Hmmm.  If the trend holds, we should trim phone lines and perhaps put
the money into a faster net connection.  But maybe hold off trimming
until after the new net connection is up & stable.
 0-24   8-32   33-57   58-82   83-107   108-132   133-154    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss