You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-480         
 
Author Message
25 new of 480 responses total.
gelinas
response 325 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 23:38 UTC 2003

Sindi, Jack Aubrey is the captain in _Master_and_Commander_; Stephen Maturin
is his ship's surgeon.  The books about their adventures were written by
Patrick O'Brian.

A friend pointed out that Hornblower was a 20th-century man placed in the 
early 19th century.  Aubrey and company seem much more to be men of their 
times.

In what context was 'gaffer" used?
keesan
response 326 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 00:23 UTC 2003

Gaffer as in making movies.  Is it related to sailing terminology?
rcurl
response 327 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 01:34 UTC 2003

Then a gaffer is  a lighting electrician on a motion-picture or television
set.
bru
response 328 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 04:35 UTC 2003

I wish I knew where my book on ships is.   It has detailed drawings on various
ships and their riggings.  Ill have to see if Ican find it.
davel
response 329 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 15:06 UTC 2003

(The current issue of _Smithsonian_ has an article on the Aubrey books & their
author, FWIW.)
gull
response 330 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 16:51 UTC 2003

Re #294: Is sailing also the origin of the expression "three sheets to
the wind"?  I've always wondered about that.
rcurl
response 331 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 21:12 UTC 2003

Yup. From the web: "To be 'three sheets to the wind' is to be drunk. The
sheet is the line that controls the sails on a ship. If the line is not
secured, the sail flops in the wind, and the ship loses headway and
control. If all three sails are loose, the ship is out of control." 

I would only add that only some boats have three sails (and sheets), so
you can also be out of control with one or two - and more - "sheets to

remmers
response 332 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 21:50 UTC 2003

the wind".
twenex
response 333 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 25 22:30 UTC 2003

"Gaffer" usually means "boss"; Sam Gamgee's father and
predecessor as Bag End's gardener in Lord of the Rigns was
known as Gaffer Gamgee, on account of his being an
authority on all things gossipy, probably.
gelinas
response 334 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 03:35 UTC 2003

}  Gaffer \Gaf"fer\, n. [Possibly contr. fr. godfather; but prob.
}     fr. gramfer for grandfather. Cf. {Gammer}.]
}     1. An old fellow; an aged rustic.
}  
}              Go to each gaffer and each goody.     --Fawkes.
}  
}     Note: Gaffer was originally a respectful title, now
}           degenerated into a term of familiarity or contempt when
}           addressed to an aged man in humble life.
}  
}     2. A foreman or overseer of a gang of laborers. [Prov. Eng.]
rcurl
response 335 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 06:05 UTC 2003

The definition of gaffer I gave in #327 was #4 copy/pasted from the
Merriam-Webster online dictionary. At least they have caught up with the
"times".

gelinas
response 336 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 06:13 UTC 2003

I wasn't disagreeing with your definition, Rane; I was responding to the
response immediately before mine.
keesan
response 337 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 13:25 UTC 2003

I have also come across 'gammer'.  Jim says the electricians are the ones who
are in charge at construction projects because they are there throughout most
of the job.  He was once an apprentice electrician for a year.  This year he
might get around to switching from fuse box to circuit breaker panel.  The
insurance company says that can cut the rates 30%.  It will also cut our
heating costs by 2/3 if he finishes the wiring.
gelinas
response 338 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 19:22 UTC 2003

And 'gammer' is the feminine equivalent of "gaffer": "prob. fr. grammer for
grandmother. Cf. {Gaffer}."
keesan
response 339 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 01:37 UTC 2003

Today I read an Agatha Christie novel whose blurb starts off:

For thousands of years the ancient city of Baghdad had been the scene of every
kind of evil known to mankind.

The book continues with something about a secret organization stockpiling
nuclear weapons somewhere in the mountains in some place like
Baluchistan.....There is a band of men, mostly young men, so evil in their
hearts and aims that the truth would hardly be believed....Antichrist!....
There must be total war--total destruction.  The small chosen band of higher
beings...when destruction had run its course, they would step in and take
over.

Apparently the current paranoia is not recent.  

Today my legs are still so wobbly that I did not go for a walk.  It feels as
if I would pull a muscle in my calves if I tried, or my knees would bend the
wrong direction.  This seems to be getting worse each cycle.  I was warned
the side effects could be cumulative.  Some people do eight cycles somehow.
But I am much better than in July-September.  They told me things would
average out between getting generally stronger and the side effects getting
worse in some ways.  Hands are shakier than last time.
twenex
response 340 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 01:44 UTC 2003

I didn't realise Agatha Christie lived long enough to see
nuclear weapons, certainly not to fear rebel terrorist
groups (not states) getting hold of them.
keesan
response 341 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 03:30 UTC 2003

This group was supposedly trying to set the Americans against the Russians
(in 1951, McCarthy era) so that they could take over the world after both
sides lost.  Agatha was still writing novels in 1973 and died in 1976.  The
Baghdad novel was slightly autobiographical in that she really did go to
Baghdad and she also met and married an archeologist there, as did the
heroine.  There was reference to avoiding charming and lovely men - her first
husband must have been both, and he fell in love with someone else after they
married and moved out.  She wrote a 1973 Hercules Poirot novel in which the
main character is an elderly lady with a servant who writes murder mysteries
and is friends with Poirot and hates to give speeches.  
The heroine of the Baghdad novel likes to invent stories about herself.
willcome
response 342 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 07:38 UTC 2003

Whore's trying to take over the world, keesan?
keesan
response 343 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 15:02 UTC 2003

As predicted, got swollen glands in my throat and a headache yesterday evening
but they went away overnight and with luck will not come back.
I want to thank whoever entered invisible-to-me responses in the last ten
items for treating this one seriously.  I plan to post it at my site after
I am done with therapy for other patients to read.  Which is why I continue
to discuss side effects even though it must be dull for grexers.

My tongue is working better than last cycle and I plan to enjoy our Chinese
Thanksgiving dinner today.
bruin
response 344 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 13:30 UTC 2003

RE #340 Agatha Christie died in 1976.
davel
response 345 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 18:00 UTC 2003

(I think certain people may be unclear on when nuclear weapons became an
issue, as well as on when Christie was writing.)
keesan
response 346 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 21:48 UTC 2003

Today I got what is probably my fifth bill from U of M for Jim's routine blood
test done July 7 (he passed).  First time I called and asked them to fix this
to 'preventive' so that the insurance would pay.  They billed me again.  Next
I asked them what happened and they said the doctor had to fax them the
correct code number for preventive.  They billed me again.  I had them talk
to the doctor's accounting person.  They billed me again.  I called the
doctor's office.  She said not to call her again and the amount was supposed
to go towards insurance deductible.  Our policy is such that routine exams are
exempted from the deductible (if billed properly).  I had the insurance
company phone the doctor's office.  I phoned the insurance company.  They said
they had explained it all.  I wonder who did what wrong this time.  I will
have to wait until Monday to call U of M Billing and the insurance company.
I think it might be time to recommend to PPOM not to use this doctor.  Three
separate billing problems already.  
        What really bothers me is that the accounting person refuses to accept
any responsibility and hangs up on me and says not to call again.  The
insurance company is being rather helpful.
keesan
response 347 of 480: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 16:39 UTC 2003

This is the time in the cycle when the  side effects start to go away.
My legs are less wobbly, as oftoday my hands are much less numb.
This cycle the headache lasted only one evening instead of 3 days (cycles 3
and 4) or 6 days (cycle 2).  My left hand only had a few twinges of pain
instead ofbeing swollenfor 3-7 days. The pain in my ribs due to pleural
effusion is less frequent and less severe.  The laryngitis wasa bit better
but is worse again now. 
Jim has been sick for 10 days now - muscle aches, very hoarse,says he feels
awful or terrible, sneezing, coughing...  I sneezed a few times this week but
don't have his cold or flu.  Amazing.  

I have gained only 1 pound in 2 weeks because he does not feel like cooking
and I did not feel like standing on wobbly legs, or cutting with shaky hands
(which are also getting a bit better now).  There is still no sign of any body
fat or increased muscle mass. I must have lost a lot of internal fat.

I am strong enough to sit putting linux on a computer for hours, but it still
hurts to sit.

We are getting Chinese food delivered daily or cooked here since Wednesday.
Jim ordered more sticky rice pudding with jujubes.

I may go for my first walk in a week today while the sun shines.  
keesan
response 348 of 480: Mark Unseen   Dec 1 17:32 UTC 2003

Today my voice is nearly normal and I can even sing.  Jim also feels enough
over his flu that he volunteered to walk me.
First I need to make lots of phone calls about insurance.
keesan
response 349 of 480: Mark Unseen   Dec 2 05:09 UTC 2003

I phoned U of M Billing and they put me on hold for a while to check why I
was being billed more than 20% of $138 and then told me the insurance company
was paying part of this and someone at U of M had 'posted' it wrong.  Who?
'The poster'.  I owed $43.  This is actually 30%, meaning the insurance
company also made a mistake (it is 70% of amounts over the deductible but 80%
of preventive care up to $400 that they pay), however I decided to pay the
extra $15 since this had been going on since July, just to end it.  I paid
by credit card over the phone.  I will check my statement carefully.

My hands continue to feel a lot better and today we went out walking in the
cold and wind, and even took a shortcut through an area overgrown with trees
and a bit hilly.  It still wears me out.  But my legs no longer feel numb.
My feet don't feel anything but pressure.  I am hungry again.  My big chance
to gain 2 pounds this week to keep up my average.  Jim feels like cooking
again.  He is happy with the linux computer I am making him to use for photo
editing and browsing (five browsers).  He is also happy that he was able to
break a piece out of his printer so that it would work with the same
cartridges as a friend's printer that he is doing refills for, and that lets
him test the refills.  And use the friend's old cartridges for everyone. 
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-480         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss