|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 610 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 313 of 610:
| 
Oct 1 16:41 UTC 1998 |
Canned salmon?
|
valerie
|
|
response 314 of 610:
|
Oct 1 17:27 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
i
|
|
response 315 of 610:
|
Oct 1 23:58 UTC 1998 |
His Snordship has it.
Yep, 6 characters long was a clue in that response (hoping to lure some
crossword puzzlers). Shrimp, etc. fit too, but i figured the size of
the can would rule most of 'em out.
Valerie: yep, i said "stumped a bunch of red-blooded American cooks
with this traditional, mainstream food". If you read a few pages on the
history of salmon fishing, you'd be able to spot a huge haul of clues in
that short phrase. References to gurus, etc. sound Indian...and both
Atlantic & Pacific salmon were staples of the American Indian diet (the
early colonists, too). I spewed loads of clues if you look, but they
were pretty much all small & subtle ones.
|
remmers
|
|
response 316 of 610:
|
Oct 2 11:27 UTC 1998 |
Grabbed at random from the pantry:
Serving size 1/4 cup
Calories 110, Calories from fat 15
Total fat 1.5g, Saturated fat 0g
Cholesterol 0g
Sodium 430mg
Total carbohydrate 20g, Dietary fiber 1g, Sugars 1g
Protein 4g
Vitamin A 0%
Vitamin C 0%
Calcium 4%
Iron 8%
|
i
|
|
response 317 of 610:
|
Oct 2 23:43 UTC 1998 |
Lots of sodium for something so low in fat & sugar....
probably not junk food, but i'd bet the container
doesn't trumpet the sodium content.
|
remmers
|
|
response 318 of 610:
|
Oct 3 11:22 UTC 1998 |
No junk food in *our* house. Anyways, not much. :)
|
valerie
|
|
response 319 of 610:
|
Oct 4 00:51 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
i
|
|
response 320 of 610:
|
Oct 4 16:39 UTC 1998 |
<i grabs the French bread & gets out some garlic butter....>
Want your garlic bread vegan, valerie?
|
valerie
|
|
response 321 of 610:
|
Oct 5 02:42 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 322 of 610:
|
Oct 5 11:53 UTC 1998 |
Just a reminder that resp:316 contains my poser. Telnetters and
direct dialers can review it by typing only 316 at the next
prompt.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 323 of 610:
|
Oct 7 02:36 UTC 1998 |
No vitamins, lots of carbs, but calcium and iron. A type of bean? Not an
animal product, (no cholesterol), but not much sugar, either. I'm definitely
leaning twoards a canned bean, of some sort.
|
remmers
|
|
response 324 of 610:
|
Oct 7 13:30 UTC 1998 |
Not bean, and not something that comes in a can.
|
i
|
|
response 325 of 610:
|
Oct 11 20:26 UTC 1998 |
Bisquick, or some similar leavening-already-added flour mixture?
|
remmers
|
|
response 326 of 610:
|
Oct 12 17:16 UTC 1998 |
No, but you're mildly lukewarm.
|
i
|
|
response 327 of 610:
|
Oct 18 00:19 UTC 1998 |
Is it mostly minimally-processed grain products?
|
remmers
|
|
response 328 of 610:
|
Oct 18 13:08 UTC 1998 |
I wouldn't call it minimally-processed.
|
valerie
|
|
response 329 of 610:
|
Oct 24 02:20 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
i
|
|
response 330 of 610:
|
Oct 24 17:37 UTC 1998 |
Instant potatoes?
|
remmers
|
|
response 331 of 610:
|
Oct 25 15:18 UTC 1998 |
Not instant potatoes. This food is not usually eaten stand-alone, but
rather mixed with other things.
|
i
|
|
response 332 of 610:
|
Oct 25 20:25 UTC 1998 |
Seasoned (quick?) rice?
|
remmers
|
|
response 333 of 610:
|
Oct 26 10:53 UTC 1998 |
Not rice.
|
alfee
|
|
response 334 of 610:
|
Oct 26 20:34 UTC 1998 |
Salad croutons?
|
remmers
|
|
response 335 of 610:
|
Oct 27 23:44 UTC 1998 |
Not croutons, but you're warmer...
|
keesan
|
|
response 336 of 610:
|
Oct 28 15:08 UTC 1998 |
breadcrumbs?
|
alfee
|
|
response 337 of 610:
|
Oct 29 01:52 UTC 1998 |
Ooh, that's a good one.
|
