You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   6-30   31-55   56-80   81-105   106-126     
 
Author Message
25 new of 126 responses total.
davel
response 31 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 01:05 UTC 1998

I also think that it would be bad for the board to become
non-technically-able, but very good to have some members of the board who are
not technically oriented.  Sindi, IMNAAHO you should reconsider.

(I also note that we're using "technical" in a somewhat limited sense. 
Sindi's translation work is surely quite technical at times, for example.)
dpc
response 32 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 01:14 UTC 1998

I would also support Sindi's candidacy, as a fellow non-techie.
keesan
response 33 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 7 21:30 UTC 1998

I nominate Dave Lovelace and David Cahill for board members.  I will be happy
to attend an occasional meeting but really do not know enough to make
decisions (i. e., vote).  My technical expertise is in things like pharmacy,
chemistry, and botany, I don't even understand many of the words used in this
conference.  I don't know what an IC is.
(Or what part of speech it is).
davel
response 34 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 00:02 UTC 1998

I decline, for reasons too many to name, but thanks anyway, Sindi.
remmers
response 35 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 11:44 UTC 1998

Re resp:33 - IC is the name of the company that used to provide our
internet connection.
remmers
response 36 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 11:55 UTC 1998

People accepting nominations so far are, in order of acceptance:

    Jan Wolter (janc)
    Eric Bassey (other)
    Jennifer Kriegel (jiffer)
    John Remmers (remmers)

In addition, STeve Andre (steve) and Colleen McGee (cmcgee) have been
nominated but have not yet either accepted or declined.

Nominations close on Sunday, November 15. That's one week from today.
robh
response 37 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 12:54 UTC 1998

I believe Dave Cahill was nominated back in #33, but has not
accepted or declined yet.
remmers
response 38 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 8 21:27 UTC 1998

That's correct. Sorry for the omission.
dpc
response 39 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 19:05 UTC 1998

I accept the nomination.
jep
response 40 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 19:59 UTC 1998

Dave Cahill has been an excellent Board member for Arbornet.
scott
response 41 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 9 20:27 UTC 1998

(I've emailed several people to see if they are willing to be nominated)
steve
response 42 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 05:06 UTC 1998

   Oops.  Shoulda read #6 more closely.   I accept.
mdw
response 43 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 07:47 UTC 1998

(grex is not much like arbornet.  vive la difference!)
mta
response 44 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 14:21 UTC 1998

resp:42  Cool!
valerie
response 45 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 17:34 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

mziemba
response 46 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 12 21:04 UTC 1998

I accept Valerie's nomination, and look forward to running with a fine group
of candidates.
davel
response 47 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 02:27 UTC 1998

'Fraid I second, third, whatever, my declination.  I would be a poor choice,
on several grounds.
cmcgee
response 48 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 13 03:24 UTC 1998

I'm waiting to respond, because I may get an assignment that keeps me out of
town a lot.  I'll let you know early next week.
other
response 49 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 06:04 UTC 1998

i second mziemba.  this could get interesting...  :):)
remmers
response 50 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 13:08 UTC 1998

FINAL REMINDER: Sunday, Nov. 15 (tomorrow) is the last day to place new
names in nomination.

Nominees so far who have accepted are:

    Eric Bassey (other)
    Jan Wolter (janc)
    STeve Andre (steve)
    John Remmers (remmers)
    Colleen McGee (cmcgee)
    Jennifer Kriegel (jiffer)
    David Cahill (dpc)
    Mark Ziemba (mziemba)

Colleen's acceptance is conditional based on information she won't have
until after November 15. But since any other nominee could also withdraw
after that deadline, I think she should be included in the list.

Eight nominees for three open slots. I think this is the most
competitive Board election that we've had in a while.
remmers
response 51 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 12:36 UTC 1998

Nominations for the Board are now closed, with the nominees being the
eight people listed in resp:50.

In accordance with the bylaws, the election will be held online and run
from December 1 through December 15. It will be possible to vote via a
terminal connection (telnet or direct dial) or the web.
dpc
response 52 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 15:01 UTC 1998

I'm impressed with the number of candidates.  A good sign!
keesan
response 53 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:46 UTC 1998

Do the candidates get to post a paragraph online telling something about their
background and any changes they would like to see made in grex?
rcurl
response 54 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:53 UTC 1998

That has been the past practice...there has been a link to candidates'
statements from the voting system, in fact. I hope that will be done
again.

scott
response 55 of 126: Mark Unseen   Nov 16 16:53 UTC 1998

(I removed the motd about nominations)
 0-24   6-30   31-55   56-80   81-105   106-126     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss