|
Grex > Coop11 > #110: Cyberspace Communications finances for June, 1999 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 78 responses total. |
aruba
|
|
response 31 of 78:
|
Jul 9 17:24 UTC 1999 |
The WELL was always a for-pay system, though, which attracts a different set
of people than Grex/Arbornet has.
While still considering the notion of setting up phone lines in other cities,
maybe it would make sense to set up whole other conferencing systems in other
cities. Perhaps Grex could loan money to make that possible. In the end it
might be good for us (not to mention good for the world in general) for Grex
to have more peers.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 32 of 78:
|
Jul 9 17:27 UTC 1999 |
Just for the sake of being idiotic, what would the cost of having an 800
number be?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 33 of 78:
|
Jul 9 18:27 UTC 1999 |
Depenmds on how many people call it..
|
drewmike
|
|
response 34 of 78:
|
Jul 9 18:29 UTC 1999 |
And how long they call. If someone calls Grex now, and doesn't terminate the
call properly, it's a hassle for Grex. If it were a toll-free number, it would
be an expense as well as a hassle.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 35 of 78:
|
Jul 9 18:41 UTC 1999 |
Well, "what if" there were one & only one grex 800 number for outstate modem-
bound people to call. So only one person at a time could use it, and would
be on as long as their session lasted. What would the cost be? Could grex
set a limit on session length for the 800 number? Etc...
|
scg
|
|
response 36 of 78:
|
Jul 9 18:56 UTC 1999 |
I'm under the impression that the going rate for 800 numbers is something like
8 cents a minute at this point. It can get somewhat cheaper with really high
volume.
|
scott
|
|
response 37 of 78:
|
Jul 9 19:47 UTC 1999 |
Let's see, $0.08 x 60 min/hour x 24 hour/day = $115.20 a day, assuming full
use (which is pretty likely).
I think this topic came up because somebody suggested Grex needed more dialins
without actually checking to see if that was true.
|
jep
|
|
response 38 of 78:
|
Jul 9 21:01 UTC 1999 |
If anyone had asked Grex for help in setting up a conferencing system
like this one, I'd be in favor of helping them. I'd think aruba's
suggestion of loans was at least worth considering. It's a *lot* of
work to set up a system like this, and beyond that it's even more work
to run it, fund it, help all the users, etc. If a loan and some advice
and moral support would help get the job done, I'd want to see Grex do
what it could.
However, there have been no requests, or even any speculations such as
"Sure would like to do something like Grex in Anchorage". On the
Internet, it doesn't matter where you are. We can serve Anchorage, have
an Anchorage conference, and have the users come in to here, using the
resources we already have, without bothering with another system,
another staff, another Board, another office, more phone lines and
Internet connections and all that. I don't see how it benefits Grex, or
users in Anchorage, or anyone at all, to have us remotely put up a
system in Anchorage and try to make sure someone there administers it
and funds it and runs it. It's easier, cheaper, more reliable (we've
been doing it for most of a decade, and almost 2 decades if you count
M-Net), and generally better all around to just keep it all here.
I'm not opposed to other systems. I'm just not wildly enthusiastic
about Grex spending much time/effort/money in getting other systems set
up, until and unless people in other places take the initiative to set
them up. *Then* we can help them.-
|
danr
|
|
response 39 of 78:
|
Jul 9 21:30 UTC 1999 |
It might be that we missed our window of opportunity to set up POPs in other
locales.
|
richard
|
|
response 40 of 78:
|
Jul 9 22:00 UTC 1999 |
The thing is that while grex is getting in a financially strong position,
it is not attracting *that* many more active users. The conferences
overrall level of activity is I would imagine fairly stable, whereas to
achieve grex's true potential, you need more people participating. How do
you *get* more people?
One way is to put dialins in other locations, so that Grex can develop a
broader base than it has. If people can dialin as opposed to using up
time on their ISP to telnet here, they will be more likely to come. It
would foster the idea that grex is more than a local ann arbor bbs.
Another way would be to get a new ISP offering better connections and
bandwith so people do graphics on confs and in their homepages. As long as
grexis text only, there is a signficant segment of people who wont ever
bother coming here.
If grex has succeeded at what it is, the challenge is to see if it can
grow from there.
|
jazz
|
|
response 41 of 78:
|
Jul 9 22:12 UTC 1999 |
It's been my understanding, which is admittedly a layperson's
understanding, that GREX is a commercially viable entity because primarily
of the consistent contributions of a group of core members whov'e been with
GREX since day one. Arbornet has lost most or all of it's original members
and no longer has any core at all, which may explain why Arbornet is no longer
financially viable.
In order to expand GREX, it would seem necessary to redefine the kind
of business, and the types of services offered.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 42 of 78:
|
Jul 9 22:31 UTC 1999 |
Re resp:40 - Golly! For once, I find myself not only not annoyed by
rchard, but indeed pleased at the cogent and coherent explanation he's given.
And some ppl say that there's no such thing as miracles! :-)
|
mdw
|
|
response 43 of 78:
|
Jul 10 01:59 UTC 1999 |
Grex isn't a "commercial viable entity". Where did you get the idea
that it is or ever was?
|
jazz
|
|
response 44 of 78:
|
Jul 10 11:54 UTC 1999 |
Ahrm, GREX loses money?
|
aruba
|
|
response 45 of 78:
|
Jul 10 18:54 UTC 1999 |
Grex doesn't lose money, but it is not a commercial entity, which I think
is what Mary meant. We don't sell anything (other than T-shirts, which we
have yet to make money on).
As to the stability of the membership - I don't believe the data would
support your statement. Members certainly come and go. I'd have to do a
little work to tell you anything more quantitative, though.
|
mary
|
|
response 46 of 78:
|
Jul 10 20:55 UTC 1999 |
Mark has me confused with Marcus. Happens all the time. ;-)
|
janc
|
|
response 47 of 78:
|
Jul 10 21:34 UTC 1999 |
We made money on the T-shirts we sold. It's the unsold ones that we
haven't made money on.
I don't think starting other Grexes makes any sense. Another Grex would
be like Grex/M-Net - diverging cultures and sets of people. There'd be
nothing drawing them together. A single Grex with several regional
focuses would be a different thing.
|
danr
|
|
response 48 of 78:
|
Jul 11 00:49 UTC 1999 |
Establishing a POP is more than just putting a POP somewhere. Unless people
know about it, they're not going to use it, which means we'd have to spend--and
spend quite a bit--on publicizing that POP.
|
drew
|
|
response 49 of 78:
|
Jul 11 02:51 UTC 1999 |
Re #13 way back there:
It occurred to me, since grex has 2G disks laying around, to ask:
would it be too much trouble to take one of those hard drives, plug it into
the Scuzzy cable, and put it into the /etc/fstab as, say, /b. Then move
all the user directories beginning with, say, n thru z, to this drive? /a has
been running at around 99% or so for several months.
|
mdw
|
|
response 50 of 78:
|
Jul 11 08:39 UTC 1999 |
If grex were a "commercial" organization, a lot of the people who have
donated time or resources would expect to get paid for it, at market
rates. That means, in very rough terms, at *least* $50k/y/fte (salary +
benefits + office expenses such as workstations and, yes, office space.)
(Realistically, this would be more like $100k.) Something like grex
would certainly require at least 2 fte's, but realistically, this is
more like 5. Some of the 5 could be el cheapo summer interns and the
like, of course. Compared to this, hardware expenses for grex proper
wouldn't be so great, except it would be harder to not justify getting
new faster stuff each year. Say, another $10K/yr. So, as a "starving"
startup, you're looking at $110K/yr (and the stock option plan better be
damn good). More realistically, you're looking at $500K+. This means a
membership base of 10x to 40x the size of the current grex base. That
in turn basically means a large metropolitan area such as new york city,
SF, etc.
When you look at the economics, it's pretty easy to see why the well and
arbornet, started by the same people with the same goal ("make money")
went in such different directions.
|
mary
|
|
response 51 of 78:
|
Jul 11 11:28 UTC 1999 |
(Mark is correct when he says we haven't made any money on the t-shirts.
The Grex Store is still in the red to the general fund.)
|
richard
|
|
response 52 of 78:
|
Jul 12 23:23 UTC 1999 |
the grex store should get set up to take credit card purchases, so it
can take orders directly over the 'net. Then it could sell a lot more
t-shirts and get into other things like coffee mugs (werent grex coffee
mugs sold in the past?)
|
dpc
|
|
response 53 of 78:
|
Jul 13 14:13 UTC 1999 |
FWIW, M-Net (Arbornet) just made a net gain for the fiscal year
closing June 30. Maybe M-Net has turned the financial corner.
I also don't see the point in setting up a new Grex system anywyere.
Dialin access is going the way of the mastadon, and people can
telnet here or come in from the Web regardless of their location.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 54 of 78:
|
Jul 13 14:22 UTC 1999 |
Dialin access is only going the way of the mastadon because large numbers of
people use systems they _can't_ dial in to. Dialling in to Grex is much more
convenient that telnetting if you happen to be local (no wait, less lag,
etc.)
I agree that grex doesn't need any more A2 dialin lines, since the existing
ones are never busy. Dialin lines in other area codes sounds like an
interesting experiment.
|
danr
|
|
response 55 of 78:
|
Jul 13 16:15 UTC 1999 |
That's not necessarily true. I'm in Ann Arbor, and haven't dialed in for more
than a year. You can easily conference via BackTalk, and if you're not into
party, there's no reason to dial in.
|