|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 610 responses total. |
i
|
|
response 304 of 610:
| 
Sep 28 20:59 UTC 1998 |
Maybe people need to re-read responses #293 & following...
I second valerie's rejection of Campbell's soup on the ground of
insufficient sodium.
Nothing wrong with handing off the trophy if you win, scott. But it's
not cheese anything.
s/nd o/nds o/
<chortle>
(Unlike the previously-known "it's a can", there was a far more subtle
clue burried in the my plug for this cf. in agora....)
|
lilmo
|
|
response 305 of 610:
|
Sep 28 23:51 UTC 1998 |
Can you tell us the number of servings per container?
|
remmers
|
|
response 306 of 610:
|
Sep 28 23:57 UTC 1998 |
(Re resp:304 - This item is in two conferences. Which one were you
plugging?)
It's not something like canned tuna is it?
|
i
|
|
response 307 of 610:
|
Sep 29 03:43 UTC 1998 |
Seven servings per container.
Cooking cf., which i regard as this item's "home" conference.
Yes, but not exactly.
So what is this and what's the clue in agora???
|
remmers
|
|
response 308 of 610:
|
Sep 29 16:57 UTC 1998 |
(Historical note: Cooking is certainly an appropriate home for this item
now, but the very first edition of it started out in Enigma, posted by
yours truly.)
|
valerie
|
|
response 309 of 610:
|
Sep 30 15:13 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 310 of 610:
|
Sep 30 15:25 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
valerie
|
|
response 311 of 610:
|
Sep 30 16:19 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
i
|
|
response 312 of 610:
|
Oct 1 03:20 UTC 1998 |
No carbo's, so it can't be ravioli.
Like Newton, lilmo's canned meat idea was a big advance *at the time*.
Yes, canned fish (i'd thought that #306/307 sort of settled that).
(Meat is defined both in ways that include and exclude fish, hence
my ambiguous "on the right track" response.)
I've never seen sardines or anchovies in a can big enough to hold 7
1/4 cup servings; the sodium content seems awefully low for them too.
You seem to have a great talent for getting very close, then making
a fast break for parts distant.....
This food has been mentioned a few times in this cf. (very few, if you're
thinking enigma), but i don't believe that it's ever been a mystery food.
|
remmers
|
|
response 313 of 610:
|
Oct 1 16:41 UTC 1998 |
Canned salmon?
|
valerie
|
|
response 314 of 610:
|
Oct 1 17:27 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
i
|
|
response 315 of 610:
|
Oct 1 23:58 UTC 1998 |
His Snordship has it.
Yep, 6 characters long was a clue in that response (hoping to lure some
crossword puzzlers). Shrimp, etc. fit too, but i figured the size of
the can would rule most of 'em out.
Valerie: yep, i said "stumped a bunch of red-blooded American cooks
with this traditional, mainstream food". If you read a few pages on the
history of salmon fishing, you'd be able to spot a huge haul of clues in
that short phrase. References to gurus, etc. sound Indian...and both
Atlantic & Pacific salmon were staples of the American Indian diet (the
early colonists, too). I spewed loads of clues if you look, but they
were pretty much all small & subtle ones.
|
remmers
|
|
response 316 of 610:
|
Oct 2 11:27 UTC 1998 |
Grabbed at random from the pantry:
Serving size 1/4 cup
Calories 110, Calories from fat 15
Total fat 1.5g, Saturated fat 0g
Cholesterol 0g
Sodium 430mg
Total carbohydrate 20g, Dietary fiber 1g, Sugars 1g
Protein 4g
Vitamin A 0%
Vitamin C 0%
Calcium 4%
Iron 8%
|
i
|
|
response 317 of 610:
|
Oct 2 23:43 UTC 1998 |
Lots of sodium for something so low in fat & sugar....
probably not junk food, but i'd bet the container
doesn't trumpet the sodium content.
|
remmers
|
|
response 318 of 610:
|
Oct 3 11:22 UTC 1998 |
No junk food in *our* house. Anyways, not much. :)
|
valerie
|
|
response 319 of 610:
|
Oct 4 00:51 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
i
|
|
response 320 of 610:
|
Oct 4 16:39 UTC 1998 |
<i grabs the French bread & gets out some garlic butter....>
Want your garlic bread vegan, valerie?
|
valerie
|
|
response 321 of 610:
|
Oct 5 02:42 UTC 1998 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 322 of 610:
|
Oct 5 11:53 UTC 1998 |
Just a reminder that resp:316 contains my poser. Telnetters and
direct dialers can review it by typing only 316 at the next
prompt.
|
lilmo
|
|
response 323 of 610:
|
Oct 7 02:36 UTC 1998 |
No vitamins, lots of carbs, but calcium and iron. A type of bean? Not an
animal product, (no cholesterol), but not much sugar, either. I'm definitely
leaning twoards a canned bean, of some sort.
|
remmers
|
|
response 324 of 610:
|
Oct 7 13:30 UTC 1998 |
Not bean, and not something that comes in a can.
|
i
|
|
response 325 of 610:
|
Oct 11 20:26 UTC 1998 |
Bisquick, or some similar leavening-already-added flour mixture?
|
remmers
|
|
response 326 of 610:
|
Oct 12 17:16 UTC 1998 |
No, but you're mildly lukewarm.
|
i
|
|
response 327 of 610:
|
Oct 18 00:19 UTC 1998 |
Is it mostly minimally-processed grain products?
|
remmers
|
|
response 328 of 610:
|
Oct 18 13:08 UTC 1998 |
I wouldn't call it minimally-processed.
|
