You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-384    
 
Author Message
25 new of 384 responses total.
keesan
response 300 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 05:43 UTC 2004

I typed Reply-To: instead of Reply-to: but that seems to have worked.   At
least it shows up in the received header.  Will the recipient's email program
ask if they want to reply to the reply-to rather than the from address?
gelinas
response 301 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 11:47 UTC 2004

It's supposed to, Sindi.
scott
response 302 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 13:47 UTC 2004

The ".eml" format is how Microsoft usually does attachments.  It's
proprietary, of course (those bastards!) but there's an option somewhere to
use plain-text or some other simple format.
gull
response 303 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 14:37 UTC 2004

".eml" has also been used as a virus vector.
keesan
response 304 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 16:07 UTC 2004

This time Jim tried to email me as attachment sax.x and it disappeared en
route with no error message.  I suggested he mail things with grex reply-to
and give up on webmail for writing mail.    WCC also sent us server info -
smtp.wwwnet.org  pop mail uses stu.wccnet.org (like webmail does).  

I wonder if Jim named his file .eml or if WCC's mail program did that.  He
said he had to use Opera to attach it but I think it was linux Opera.  Lynx
would not do attachments to webmail and told us so.  
keesan
response 305 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 17:20 UTC 2004

Jim finally got it right and mailed me an attachment, at about the same time
that I figured out that to use non-webmail at wcc the regular login is
jdeigert@stu.wccnet.org and the email login is plain jdeigert.  I have smtp
mail working now with 2 DOS mail programs, but WCC does not like the email
password (which worked for regular login and for webmail).  No big deal, he
can use webmail to read his mail but it is a pain to write mail with it.
tod
response 306 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 18:39 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 307 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 19:16 UTC 2004

I have changed my filter to send a few things directly to /dev/null
(last line of the filter) instead of ....../bulk  - viagra, via-gra, viakgra,
xanax, cialis, vicodin.  Anything addressed to webmaster and me goes to
/dev/null.  Have fun with your spam net.
krokus
response 308 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 21:34 UTC 2004

system is slow, and loads are high.

  4:29pm  up 27 days, 18:18,  50 users,  load average: 28.93, 29.96, 27.39
jhudson
response 309 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 20:33 UTC 2004

That's normal!
jhudson
response 310 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 20:53 UTC 2004

/tmp has a lot of files called "newuser.xxxxx"
there is a lot of junk in /var/tmp

There seems to be no script to successfully clean up
everything.
gelinas
response 311 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 3 21:42 UTC 2004

There is a script, and it does a pretty good job.  But thanks for pointing
out that it may overlook a few things.

tsty
response 312 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 4 19:00 UTC 2004

  
newuser  ttyp6    22Feb04  9days      7      2  /usr/local/bin/bash
newuser  ttyp0    10Feb04 20days  11:39  10:17  pine
  
long emails?
jhudson
response 313 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 17:41 UTC 2004

???
How did somebody get the name "newuser" ?
krokus
response 314 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 23:05 UTC 2004

re 309
Normal?  sure...

This looks normal:
  6:04pm  up 30 days, 19:54,  42 users,  load average: 5.55, 5.65, 5.74
russ
response 315 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 12:03 UTC 2004

Only 15 people "on" according to "finger", but this is probably due
to something refusing to allocate pty's.

Also, Grex is excruciatingly slow.  Maybe someone can clear this problem?
krj
response 316 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 18:13 UTC 2004

It's the return of the cold weather.  Grex moves slower in colder 
weather.

1:10pm  up 33 days, 14:59,  52 users,  load average: 29.58, 29.24, 24.87
gelinas
response 317 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 20:02 UTC 2004

Fixed; it's coming back down to normal:

  3:02pm  up 33 days, 16:51,  60 users,  load average: 4.86, 9.67, 15.73
jor
response 318 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 22:48 UTC 2004

         wow much peppier
salad
response 319 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 9 02:11 UTC 2004

        HAWT
keesan
response 320 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 04:28 UTC 2004

We dialed  761-5041 and got screenfuls of gibberish and beeping scrolling by,
followed by a disconnect.  Did this three times.  Tried 761-3000 and got BUSY,
then tried again andgot through okay.  Modem going haywire?  Would this
indicate that hte last modem in the queue is the culprit.  Antoher grex user
reporting things scrolling by and gave us her computer to fix.  It is not
broken.  She said grex also stopped letting her type anything (disconnect?).
twenex
response 321 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 15:30 UTC 2004

Grex was down/unaviaolble between the hours of 12:45 and 15:20 GMT
(approximately). At one point it was inaccessible by tel;net but could be
pinged, then later it bgecame unpingable also. What happened?
gelinas
response 322 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 15:36 UTC 2004

I think /tmp filled up, but I'm not really sure.  I came in to find that
a couple of the drives wouldn't fsck automatically and had to be fsck'd
manually.

I couldn't log on at the console and had to power-cycle the machine,
which probably contributed to the fsck problem.  (Dirty shut-downs are
never nice.)
twenex
response 323 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 15:39 UTC 2004

You're right there.
twenex
response 324 of 384: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 15:42 UTC 2004

Simetmoes O raeyll wohs O cuodl tpye batter.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-384    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss