|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 71 responses total. |
aruba
|
|
response 29 of 71:
| 
Dec 2 13:53 UTC 2003 |
It's more than sufficient for your purposes.
|
jp2
|
|
response 30 of 71:
|
Dec 2 13:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 31 of 71:
|
Dec 2 14:53 UTC 2003 |
What's your point? Is there one, or are you just attempting to make
things as difficult as possible for staff? You seem to come up with an
endless stream of these minor, apparently pointless issues to complain
about.
|
jp2
|
|
response 32 of 71:
|
Dec 2 15:13 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
davel
|
|
response 33 of 71:
|
Dec 2 16:48 UTC 2003 |
(You're admitting that we were right then? Or you lost an if?)
|
mary
|
|
response 34 of 71:
|
Dec 2 16:53 UTC 2003 |
If you want to know member's addresses then send them
email explaining why you want it. If they share that
information with you, great.
But if the member doesn't want to share it, then Grex
certainly isn't going to do so either. But you knew
that.
Your move.
|
jp2
|
|
response 35 of 71:
|
Dec 2 17:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 36 of 71:
|
Dec 2 17:32 UTC 2003 |
Jamie, what are you trying to accomplish?
|
flem
|
|
response 37 of 71:
|
Dec 2 17:51 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, really. What the hell is your point? Can you possible imagine
that we're stupid enough to believe thet you think you're trying to do
something good for Grex with this nonsense?
|
jp2
|
|
response 38 of 71:
|
Dec 2 18:07 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 39 of 71:
|
Dec 2 18:42 UTC 2003 |
Re #36: I think this must be part of Jamie's grand plan to recruit more
members for Grex by making membership more attractive.
No, wait...
|
aruba
|
|
response 40 of 71:
|
Dec 2 19:05 UTC 2003 |
What does this (non-) issue of quorum have to do with a membership list?
I fail to see the connection. The law you quoted clearly has to do with
an in-person meeting, where the voting is restricted to those people in
the room. Here on Grex, all members are "in the room", in the sense of
being able to vote, at any time. So a membership list won't help you to
guess how many people will vote. Therefore I conclude that your request
for the list is an attempt to accomplish something else. What is it?
|
flem
|
|
response 41 of 71:
|
Dec 2 20:09 UTC 2003 |
As nearly as I can tell, it is an attack on Grex. The only thing I can
imagine that he could hope to accomplish by this is to drive away
members. And it's coming from someone who is currently running for the
board of directors.
<spits on the floor>
|
jp2
|
|
response 42 of 71:
|
Dec 2 20:49 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
willcome
|
|
response 43 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:01 UTC 2003 |
Would someone please tell me why Grex reacts with hostility towards
attempts to get it to comply with the LAW?
Also, I'd like to be the first Grex member to give my address to jp2:
David Hoffman
944 Tillison Ave.
Cobourg, Ontario K9A5N2
Canada
|
jp2
|
|
response 44 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:05 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 45 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:18 UTC 2003 |
The use of the list is to establish that a quorum exists. A quorum, despite
Jamie's protestations to the contrary, is not required. Therefore, he can
NOT in "good faith [challenge] the existence of sufficient votes to carry any
action."
His actions are NOT in good faith.
|
jp2
|
|
response 46 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:25 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 47 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:27 UTC 2003 |
Prove it.
Your citations are not proof.
|
jp2
|
|
response 48 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:33 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 49 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:35 UTC 2003 |
Jamie - you didn't answer my question in #40.
Yes, Cyberspace Communications is a Michigan Corporation. I'll ask the next
one: are we currently at a meeting of the membership?
|
jp2
|
|
response 50 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:36 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 51 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:39 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
aruba
|
|
response 52 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:52 UTC 2003 |
I think anyone you convince of that would also be convinced that an email
address is an address.
|
jp2
|
|
response 53 of 71:
|
Dec 2 21:54 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|