|
Grex > Coop11 > #130: Nominations for the Board of Directors | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 167 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 29 of 167:
|
Nov 2 12:17 UTC 1999 |
No, I don't think so. Grex's bylaws require it however. The bylaws can
be amended by member vote, so this could be changed in the future if
folks want to.
|
remmers
|
|
response 30 of 167:
|
Nov 2 13:46 UTC 1999 |
Oh by the way, I second Mary's nomination of mdw.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 31 of 167:
|
Nov 2 20:47 UTC 1999 |
Well, another year, another declination. I appreciate the support, and will
consider the Grex board in the future, but I'm still not in a position to help
this way this year. Thanks, remmers. Maybe next time.
|
dpc
|
|
response 32 of 167:
|
Nov 2 20:55 UTC 1999 |
Whoever takes aruba's place as treasurer will be stepping into the
shoes of a giant.
|
spooked
|
|
response 33 of 167:
|
Nov 3 01:06 UTC 1999 |
My nominations include: other, mdw, krj, and valerie
|
aruba
|
|
response 34 of 167:
|
Nov 3 03:15 UTC 1999 |
Re #32: That's very kind of you to say, Dave. I don't want to give the
impression that being treasurer is impossible, though, or even very hard. It
mostly just requires someone who is careful, honest, and reasonably
dependable. It does take some time, but it doesn't have to take over your
life.
|
aruba
|
|
response 35 of 167:
|
Nov 3 13:29 UTC 1999 |
I'd like to nominate Greg Fleming (flem).
|
aruba
|
|
response 36 of 167:
|
Nov 3 13:39 UTC 1999 |
I'll second the nomination of krj.
|
bruin
|
|
response 37 of 167:
|
Nov 3 13:59 UTC 1999 |
I second flem's nomination.
|
hhsrat
|
|
response 38 of 167:
|
Nov 4 02:50 UTC 1999 |
Are there any age restrictions to being on the board?
Second question - if a check was mailed November 4, from A2, is there a
reasonable chance that it would make it to Grex HQ in time?
|
scg
|
|
response 39 of 167:
|
Nov 4 06:05 UTC 1999 |
I was the second minor to be on the board, but at some point after I turned
18 somebody informed us that having minors on the board was illegal. So, at
this point, you have to be at least 18 to be on the board, unfortunately.
|
aruba
|
|
response 40 of 167:
|
Nov 4 15:29 UTC 1999 |
Re #38: If you mail a check today I should pick it up on Monday the 8th.
Steve is correct thought that the bottom line, when Valerie investigated it,
was that minors couldn't serve as board members.
|
laotzu
|
|
response 41 of 167:
|
Nov 4 18:25 UTC 1999 |
Well I am tickled that I was nominated even if it was followed by a tooth and
claw argument about just about everything. Unfortunatly I am eligible as
mention before for about 5 more months. Thanks for the nomination, eyenot.
Maybe next year.
|
mary
|
|
response 42 of 167:
|
Nov 5 00:58 UTC 1999 |
Is anyone else getting a bit concerned that nobody, so far, has agreed to
be a candidate? Is it apathy, busy schedules, fear of being pressured to
take on the duties of treasurer, concern over the whole Internet
censorship thing? Or maybe folks are just waiting to see others jump
in first. Dunno.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 43 of 167:
|
Nov 5 01:02 UTC 1999 |
tod will you know.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 44 of 167:
|
Nov 5 02:55 UTC 1999 |
Mary, I for one would love to be on the board. Unfortunately, I am currently
on two _very_ active boards (Food Coop and AATA). I can't keep up with those
responsibilities and my private life at the moment. So, it is none of the
above. It is trying to be a responsible board member on any board I'm elected
or appointed to.
|
scg
|
|
response 45 of 167:
|
Nov 5 04:37 UTC 1999 |
It seems we have the following nominations here:
krj
scg -- declined
mary
laotzu -- ineligible
gibson
russ
valerie
other
cmcgee -- declined
mdw
flem
tod???
I put the ??? after tod because while he's hinted that he's running in a few
other items, he has neither been nominated nor accepted in this item.
So, any other nominations? Do any of you who have been nominated want to
accept?
I'd further like to suggest that we keep this item limited to nominations and
acceptances, and perhaps minor proceduarl questions. Policy debates belong
elsewhere.
|
other
|
|
response 46 of 167:
|
Nov 5 06:50 UTC 1999 |
After careful consideration, I have decided to accept the nomination
for membership in the Board of Directors of Cyberspace Communications,
Incorporated.
I have a brief statement which can be viewed by typing the following,
(with the leading ! from a menu or bbs prompt, without it from a shell
prompt):
!cat /a/o/t/other/statement
|
janc
|
|
response 47 of 167:
|
Nov 5 07:23 UTC 1999 |
Cool!
|
mdw
|
|
response 48 of 167:
|
Nov 5 08:24 UTC 1999 |
I can certainly accept.
|
aruba
|
|
response 49 of 167:
|
Nov 5 15:00 UTC 1999 |
Great! That's two.
|
flem
|
|
response 50 of 167:
|
Nov 5 15:53 UTC 1999 |
I had meant to accept, but for some reason it didn't occur to me that I
actually needed to say anything. Probably because no one else had, so
far. So, I'll accept the nomination as well. :)
|
happyboy
|
|
response 51 of 167:
|
Nov 5 22:17 UTC 1999 |
i nominate tod. there.
|
scg
|
|
response 52 of 167:
|
Nov 6 05:19 UTC 1999 |
Ok, so we have:
Nominees who have accepted:
other
mdw
flem
nominees who have not accepted:
krj
mary
gibson
russ
valerie
tod
nominees who have declined:
scg
cmcgee
Nominees who are ineligible:
laotzu
|
spooked
|
|
response 53 of 167:
|
Nov 6 14:57 UTC 1999 |
I added a little message to the motd hoping to prompt interest.
|