You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   4-28   29-50        
 
Author Message
22 new of 50 responses total.
krj
response 29 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 05:08 UTC 1999

I just created the login "mpukk2" from the Melonite web page.
You do get what appears to be the standard Grex newuser page when you come
in this way.  
 
Hmmmmm.
steve
response 30 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 12:19 UTC 1999

   Yeah, this is really odd.  It's not quite defrauding us, but we aren't
in cooperation with them, either.  I begin to think that this person is
a kid, who is playing games.
   There is another web site, for another fantasy company "Melonite
STudios" which doesn't seem to be much.  I found this one by doing
a search on 'booguz' (or however its spelled).
   Still, I agree with Ken that we should stop this.  It's idiotic and
if we won't take measures to stop this I wonder if we'll see more of it.
cmcgee
response 31 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 12:51 UTC 1999

Yes, I agree with Ken.  I anyone I'm providing free services too to recognize
that it's little ol' us, not somecompany in Europe.  The attitude of newusers
who come from that site is likely to be far less grex-community oriented if
they don't even know who we are.  
robh
response 32 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 13:32 UTC 1999

The part that really gets me is that he has several links to
a page named "404.htm" which looks like the usual "file not found"
error message you'd get if a link was invalid.  Could someone
explain to me why you'd set up a link to such a page, instead of
putting an "under construction" sign, or - even more bizarre -
actually writing the pages?

Conspiracy, stupidity, it can be so hard to tell the difference.  >8)
steve
response 33 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 16:00 UTC 1999

   These things suggest to me that the person is a kid somewhere
is Sweden playing around.
other
response 34 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 19:21 UTC 1999

on their info page there is a note from a 'custome service manager' who lists
his email as an account on grex, and lists a name also, neither of which i
remember at the moment, but i emailed the pages to remmers.
steve
response 35 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 19:31 UTC 1999

   Right -- and the account doesn't exist, unless its been changed in
the last 20 hours.
krj
response 36 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 20:01 UTC 1999

the "itacs" account doesn't exist, but "mpuk," which is also mentioned
on the web pages, does.
devnull
response 37 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 20:14 UTC 1999

Re #27: I wasn't aware that there's a requirement to register the copyright
if you want to sue.  Lawsuits cost money, just as copyright registration
does...
cmcgee
response 38 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 20:46 UTC 1999

Copyrights must be registered with the copyright office if you want to collect
certain damages.  Your right to collect those damages begins when the work
is registered with the copyright office.  Your _copyright_ begins when you
create the work.  So you can sue to defend your copyright at any time, but
to collect punitive damages, you need to have registered the copyright.  
janc
response 39 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 21:12 UTC 1999

Any time you see a form on the web, like Grex's newuser form, it is
worth recognizing that there are two completely separate things
happening here:  the display of the form, and the processing of the
form.  Webnewuser is a program on Grex that processes forms.  Anyone,
anywhere could put up a form that points to it.

There is no particular security issue here.  If you submit the form on
mpuk's page, the submitted data goes straight to Grex, just the same as
it would if you had submitted the same data using our form.  Webnewuser
is conscious of the fact that submissions may come from forms other than
ours and does all sorts of checking on the input (for example, it
doesn't assume that nobody will submit a login name longer than eight
characters just because the login box on our form is only eight
characters wide).

Nor does mpuk's page have any control over what happens after the form
is submitted.  What happens, if account creation is successful, is that
you see this page:

      http://www.grex.org/nu/welcome.html

This welcomes users to Grex, and gives a brief summary of the rules
(including the "no irc bots" thing).  It says:

        Grex is funded entirely by donations from its users, and
        staffed entirely by volunteers. We offer free access everyone
        in the whole world. We are poor as church mice. If you find
        Grex useful to you and i you are not poor yourself, we hope you
        will eventually consider supporting Grex by becoming a member.
        This will also let you vote in our elections, thus becoming a
        member of one of the world's foremost on-line democracies.

I suppose you could add something to this page saying we are not
affiliated with MPUK, but it hardly seems a big enough issue to be
worth mentioning.  I don't think the page sounds much like an MPUK
affiliate.  I don't think the copy of our newuser form is that big
an issue.

I certainly agree that we shouldn't allow people we don't know to go
around claiming that they are affiliated with us.  We first heard about
this from some people at some kind of internet-cafe who had actually
seen him building the site, which also claimed that they were
affiliates.  They were sending mail to the other "affiliates" to see if
any of the others had ever heard of him.  These people know who this guy
is, and are probably in a better position to act than we are. 
Contacting whomever is hosting these pages might also be useful.
tpryan
response 40 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 23 22:58 UTC 1999

        Why let *them* know Grex didn't pay any trademark fees.  From
what I know, a copyright exists if you say it does, such as the copyright
note at the end of the CNN Headline News, or WDIV news.
scg
response 41 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 00:15 UTC 1999

Trademarks can either be registered (R) or unregistered (TM).  Both have legal
force, but registered trademarks are, for obvious reasons, easier to document.
It's been our position for a while that Grex is a trademark of ours.  We
should certainly tell them to stop using the name and logo.

About the grammar:  Yes, a lot of the grammar on that page looks strange from
an American perspective.  I was noticing the same thing about the newspaper
articles and such when I was in Britian.  As far as I can tell, the page has
perfectly valid British grammar.
void
response 42 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 20:53 UTC 1999

   the copyright office has a web site at 
http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright/ as well as a very informative document 
called "copyright basics" at 
http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright/circs/circ1.html.

   according to what i read there, cmcgee has it about right; 
registering a copyright allows the creator of a work to get punitive 
damages, while an unregistered copyright allows the creator of a work to 
sue to defend the copyright.
kaplan
response 43 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 00:03 UTC 1999

http://v3.come.to/answers/5.html says that the .to top level domain 
belongs to the South Pacific Island nation of Tonga.  I wonder if 
anyone in or employed by Tonga cares about how their TLD is being used.
mdw
response 44 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 25 05:29 UTC 1999

.to is also a sort of "vanity" TLD.  It works sort of like those first day
stamp issues.  I'd venture to guess that over half of the machines under
.to exist in the continental US.

I think there's been some discussion about .to in the
news.admin.net-abuse.email; if I remember right, the conclusion was that
they were adequately prepared to deal with spammers.  So I imagine that
they would not take a kindly eye to whatever was being done with
"welcome.to".  That is, if we can figure out what it is these people
really were doing - it's still kind of mysterious to me.
devnull
response 45 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 26 03:23 UTC 1999

Depending on what browser is used, grex's web server ought to often be able
to see a REFERER header, which could be used to determine which site submitted
the form.  This could be used to display additional text in the cases where
grex gets a referer header which indicates the form from the rouge site
was used to get this account.
dang
response 46 of 50: Mark Unseen   Feb 26 16:15 UTC 1999

Actually, I'd be inclined to add a blurb at the top if the form came
from *anywhere* except grex.
mdw
response 47 of 50: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 03:39 UTC 1999

There's no reason to mess around with REFERER fields or cookies or
anything else.  A simple way, that would work with *all* browsers, is to
have wnu generate the form as well as process the posted data.  When it
generates the form, it can generate a pseudo-path (such as
http://www.cyberspace.org/cgi-bin/wnu/haponymarryoneway ), and when
cgi-bin/wnu is run, it can just look at PATH_INFO to pull out
haponymarryoneway and if that string "checks out", it knows the form
given to it came from wnu.  The "haponymarryoneway" string can be an
encoded and encrypted data string (or could even be just a keyed
cryptographic hash, such as hmac) of the ipaddress, timestamp, and
perhaps a hidden field nonce.  If the data doesn't match up, wnu could
return any sort of helpful error form.  A useful error form might ask
people to only link to the wnu's main page, include a pointer to the
main page, a pointer to more information about grex, a feedback form in
case people get that due to an overly clever anonymous proxy server, and
might even include a hidden copy of any fields someone filled out from
the "bogus" wnu main page with a pointer to the wnu main page.
srw
response 48 of 50: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 18:32 UTC 1999

That's more work than just checking referrer, but (stepping back) while 
I wouldn't mind seeing any technical solution that allowed WNU to reject 
such forms, I also think it would be a good idea for us to pursue what 
this person is doing as inappropriate use of our intellectual property. 
I believe that we should see what pressure we can bring to get it 
stopped because I think we need to protect our service mark. This is 
fraudulent use of our service mark. This is almost certainly against the 
law in scotland, btw, though I doubt it'll come to that.
lilmo
response 49 of 50: Mark Unseen   Apr 14 03:08 UTC 1999

Any progress on our "partner"?  :-)
steve
response 50 of 50: Mark Unseen   Apr 17 15:15 UTC 1999

  If you mean the idiots who say they're a online presence, they're gone.
I never got a reply from them directly, but the Xoom folks who got mail
from me explaining the situation killed the Melonite pages within hours
of my sending the mail.

  Scratch one "partner".
 0-24   4-28   29-50        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss