You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   257-281   282-306   307-331   332-356   357-381   382-406   407-409 
 
Author Message
25 new of 409 responses total.
senna
response 282 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 18:17 UTC 2000

Also a waste of time, but it's more entertaining, with (amazingly) better
people, at least in the sports I watch.  I mostly have extreme distaste for
the self-righteous parties bickering with each other and pretending that they
actually have a moral advantage where none exists.  I mean, come on.  Both
of them are whining and moaning and claiming the other is the putative
embodiment of evil, knowing full well they would do the exact same thing in
that position.  Just shut up and go away.  
rcurl
response 283 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 18:28 UTC 2000

How else could they act and respond, and meet your approval?
aaron
response 284 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 21:26 UTC 2000

Another thing the Bush camp glosses over is how wildy disparate the two
machine counts were. If machine counting is so wonderfully accurate, why
the 49,000,000:1 change in the outcome? Whatever warts hand counting may
have, it seems extremely unlikely that it could be less accurate than
Florida's machine count.
krj
response 285 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 29 22:59 UTC 2000

Today's Bush outrage: after stalling stalling stalling until it's too late
to do a full manual recount on Miami Dade, the Bushies now demand that 
if any examination of the undervote there happens, it must be accompanied
by a full manual recount.  Clearly a delaying tactic.
 
I am really hoping we can goad the Florida legislature into awarding
the 25 electors to Bush.
rcurl
response 286 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 06:52 UTC 2000

Must have been a typo - you mean, to Gore, don't you?
krj
response 287 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 11:36 UTC 2000

No.  As I've written elsewhere, I think it's nearly certain that Bush
will be inaugurated as President.  I'm just cheering on the GOP to
do as much damage as possible in the process of installing him.
gull
response 288 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 18:51 UTC 2000

I doubt any of this will help turnout next time.  Why bother voting if your
the counting process is hopelessly flawed anyway?
senna
response 289 of 409: Mark Unseen   Nov 30 19:09 UTC 2000

One of the reasons turnout is so lousy is apathy toward the available options.
And wouldn't you know it, I don't think either of the parties are doing
themselves any favors in that department.
krj
response 290 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 07:28 UTC 2000

Today's Miami Herald (www.miamiherald.com) runs a statistical analysis 
arguing that Florida's elections screwups cost Gore a 20,000 vote win
in Florida.
mdw
response 291 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 07:38 UTC 2000

That sounds about right -- from the sounds of it, most of it is the
butterfly ballot.
bdh3
response 292 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 09:44 UTC 2000

Its december third.  Get over it.  The election as agreed to by all
parties concerned in advance is over.  Live with it.
rcurl
response 293 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 21:33 UTC 2000

There are full provisions in Florida law for contesting elections, and
this election is sure contestable. Your mantra of "get over it" is
just the hubris of those with the temporary upper hand. They may, in
fact, win, with all of the delaying tactics they are playing, but in
the end the truth will become known, and they will suffer the backlash.
There is a saying about reaping what you sow.
mdw
response 294 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 02:51 UTC 2000

That might be true if voters had a memory longer than 1 week.
krj
response 295 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 05:50 UTC 2000

Seminole County: uh-oh.  On MSNBC's "Hardball" show, a Democratic 
congressman from Florida charges that Democrats were denied the opportunity
to fix defective absentee ballot applications there.
 
It's agreed by both sides that the Republicans were given access to 
fix their defective absentee ballot applications.  The argument is that 
this was just a technical violation of the rules.  But if a charge that 
the Democrats were denied similar access stands up, then I think it 
becomes awfully likely that those absentee votes will be tossed.
Oh dear.
bru
response 296 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 12:29 UTC 2000

On face the nation, one of the people said that the Dems WANT to drag this
out so that the Florida legislature HAS to make a decision on choosing Bush
electors.  They figure to make gains in the next election if it does occur.
senna
response 297 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 12:59 UTC 2000

Ken sounds legitimately concerned that Florida might be overturned.  It sounds
suspiciously like he is more worried about public opinion than he is about
getting his candidate in the white house.  I can't say I'd blame him.
mdw
response 298 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 18:43 UTC 2000

I know my candidate won't make it to the whitehouse no matter which side
wins in Florida.  I would just like to see the Republicans make as much
of an honest effort to get all the votes counted accurately and fairly
as the Democrats.
aruba
response 299 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 19:22 UTC 2000

I heard a reporter on one of the news channels say what Ken heard the
congressman say on Hardball.  I would like to hear more about it.
aaron
response 300 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 4 21:21 UTC 2000

U.S. Newswire, December 3, 2000, Sunday

Key Depositions Completed in Seminole County Republican Election Fraud
Case, Top Witness for the Defense Provides Crucial Testimony for the
Plaintiff

Boca Raton, Florida: Depositions continued Dec. 2 in preparation for
Wednesday's trial of Seminole County election supervisor Sandra Goard. 
Goard is accused of illegally permitting Republican Party officials to fill
in 4,700 incomplete GOP absentee ballot requests while simultaneously
rejecting incomplete Democratic absentee ballot requests. 

The plaintiff in the case is Seminole County attorney Harry Jacobs, who is
being represented by Gerald Richman of Richman, Greer, Weil, Brumbaugh,
Mirabito and Christensen of Palm Beach. 

Richman characterized the Dec. 2 depositions -- all witnesses called by the
defense -- as helpful in creating a record that proves his client's case. 
Jacobs himself was deposed, but according to Richman the key moment was the
testimony of WDBO reporter Ken Altieri.  He testified that he interviewed
Goard on tape saying that absentee ballot request forms without voter
identification numbers would not be honored.  This interview was broadcast
at the same time as Goard was permitting workers paid by the Republican
Party to complete the forms. 

With most of the depositions now complete Richman says, "I am very
confident we will be ready for the one day trial next Wednesday that Judge
Clark has told us to expect." 

On Monday statistical and computer experts are scheduled to be deposed. 

Meanwhile, the ad hoc organization set up to support Harry Jacobs, the
plaintiff in this case, has begun operation of a Web site at
http://justiceinflorida.com. The Justice in Florida committee has been
organized by Gregg Weiss, a financial planner in Boca Raton and other
Floridians. Democrats.com, the largest independent community of Democratic
activists on the Internet is also lending organizational support to this
effort. In the first 24 hours of operation the Web site generated more than
a dozen contributions to support the out-of-pocket expenses associated with
the suit. The Justice in Florida Committee can be reached at 561-477-0930,
on the Internet at justiceinflorida.com or via e-mail at
info@justiceinflorida.com. Non-tax deductible contributions will also be
accepted at Post Office Box 970446 Boca Raton, Fla. 33497-0446. 

This grassroots effort is entirely independent of the Florida Democratic
Party or the Gore for President campaign. 

Earlier this year, Florida Republicans mailed out thousands of reply
requests for absentee ballots to GOP voters that left blank the voter ID
number required by Florida's anti-fraud election law. Goard, a Republican,
contacted GOP County Chairman James Stelling, who provided two workers
worked in her offices filling in the missing voter ID numbers. Under oath
yesterday Republican Party regional director Michael Leach admitted that he
was in the supervisors office doing this for at least 15 days,
unsupervised, and that he changed more than 2,000 forms. Goard did not
process similar incomplete requests for absentee ballots from Democratic
voters and refused to allow Democratic officials the same opportunity to
complete them. Florida law requires the voter, a family member or guardian
to complete all information on the absentee ballot application. 

A 1998 court ruling granted Florida judges broad authority to invalidate
elections if fraud or even unintentional error results in a flawed outcome. 
In Seminole County, Bush also won the 15,000 absentee ballots cast by a
2-to-1 margin. 

CONTACT:Greg Weiss, 561-477-0930 or info@justiceinflorida.com; Web site: 
http://justiceinflorida.com

------------------------------

Los Angeles Times, December 2, 2000, Page A-1

Decision 2000 / America Waits

* Democrats filed suit in Tallahassee, the state capital, seeking to
disqualify nearly 10,000 absentee ballots cast in Martin County, in eastern
Florida. The county's Republican supervisor of elections, Peggy S. Robbins,
allowed GOP workers to take flawed absentee ballot forms home and correct
them but allegedly denied Democrats the same opportunity to make fixes. The
case is similar to one involving absentee ballot applications in Seminole
County.
aruba
response 301 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 04:50 UTC 2000

Thanks Aaron.  That's a very frightening story.
albaugh
response 302 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 16:47 UTC 2000

Yeah, it's "interesting" and all.  And if some elections officials violated
some statutes re: ballot *applications*, they'll have to answer for it.  But
there is no notion or proof of fraud or tampering with the actual *ballots*.
So don't look for any "remedy" whereby properly filled out, returned, and
counted ballots are thrown out.
aaron
response 303 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 16:52 UTC 2000

Why not? The reason for the strict language of the statute is that there
was prior fraud in the application process which required the exclusion of
all absentee ballots from a particular county's election result.
albaugh
response 304 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 16:56 UTC 2000

Yep, go ahead and whitewash the whole county, make sure that every vote [not]
counts.  But will it play in Peoria?  (Depends on whether Peoria is under
Chicago's thumb, I guess.)
aaron
response 305 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 17:01 UTC 2000

That's the reason the Democrats have not endorsed the litigation - it
conflicts with their call that every vote should be counted. Nonetheless,
it seems no more fair to exclude the ballots of people whose votes were
not properly tabulated by machines in other counties. For the Republicans
to argue that certain overseas absentee ballots should be counted in
violation of Florida law, and that various other absentee ballots should
be counted despite violations of a fraud prevention statute in the
application process... doesn't that make it somewhat hypocritical for
them to oppose hand counts that are specifically authorized by statute?
mdw
response 306 of 409: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 17:08 UTC 2000

I think the issue is that they *weren't* properly filled out.  Having
election officials selectively fill out Republican ballots sure sounds
like fraud to me.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   257-281   282-306   307-331   332-356   357-381   382-406   407-409 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss