|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 17 new of 44 responses total. |
mary
|
|
response 28 of 44:
| 
Jun 28 12:17 UTC 2000 |
I think it's well worth some dead conferences to be able to offer everyone
and anyone the chance to try out their own conference with minimal hassle.
Steve will be on my list and I already have one item ready for Twinkie.
Something along the lines of "Let's list all of the things women would
rather do than have sex with twinkie." ;-)
|
remmers
|
|
response 29 of 44:
|
Jun 28 13:39 UTC 2000 |
Re #23 and #25: I agree with those sentiments. If Kevin were to
do something like regularly linking items from other conferences
into the twinkie conference without the poster's permission, then
it could be a problem because then people who hadn't joined the
conference could unexpectedly find themselves reading it. But
you don't plan to do that, do you Kevin?
|
flem
|
|
response 30 of 44:
|
Jun 28 13:45 UTC 2000 |
re resp:28 - Okay, now I'll be reading twinkie. :)
|
krj
|
|
response 31 of 44:
|
Jun 28 17:43 UTC 2000 |
I think we should rush these conferences into an production on
an emergency basis. Please.
:)
|
twinkie
|
|
response 32 of 44:
|
Jun 28 21:35 UTC 2000 |
re : 29 --I wasn't planning on the ol' link-and-kill, In fact, I don't know
that it's even technically possible with PicoSpan.
For the record, I am officially withdrawing my request for the Steve
conference (but not the Twinkie conference)
|
md
|
|
response 33 of 44:
|
Jun 28 22:38 UTC 2000 |
...and I'm continuing the request uninterrupted.
Do let us know as soon as it's ready.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 34 of 44:
|
Jun 29 21:39 UTC 2000 |
I object to md's request to maintain my Steve Conference proposal.
I think he's essentially "riding" on my request, which is not fair to the user
base. More importantly, md has not given any indication of what the Steve
Conference would be about.
At the very least, I would expect the Steve Conference discussions to continue
for however many days it took md to decide he wanted to fw that conference.
|
carson
|
|
response 35 of 44:
|
Jun 29 22:15 UTC 2000 |
(you mean two more days?)
|
md
|
|
response 36 of 44:
|
Jun 29 22:30 UTC 2000 |
34: Object all you like, feebles. The steve conference
is as described in response #7, which was posted on 6/23.
That's the conference I volunteered to fairwitness, on
6/26. Whether it evolves or not (becomes enlightened,
you might say) is for myself and above all the participants
to determine as time goes by, as with every other cf.
Btw, if Kevin decides he no longer wants to fairwitness
the twinkie conference for, you know, whatever reason, or
if he abandons it or something, I volunteer to fairwitness
that one, too.
|
jp2
|
|
response 37 of 44:
|
Jun 29 22:33 UTC 2000 |
This response has been erased.
|
md
|
|
response 38 of 44:
|
Jun 29 22:49 UTC 2000 |
Well, I think you're right to fear that Twinkie can't
handle Twinkie by himself (ahem), but I don't need any
help with steve (ahem).
|
eeyore
|
|
response 39 of 44:
|
Jun 30 03:25 UTC 2000 |
Oh my, what a field day with that one!!!!!
I vote that we justlet everybody play with their own twinkies.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 40 of 44:
|
Jun 30 06:46 UTC 2000 |
For once, md is right.
My (ahem) "twinkie" is indeed far too large for me to handle by myself.
|
md
|
|
response 41 of 44:
|
Jun 30 11:03 UTC 2000 |
I think it's just your eyesight. Too much twinkie-handling
will do that.
ANYway, I want my conference! Is it ready?
|
twinkie
|
|
response 42 of 44:
|
Jul 2 08:35 UTC 2000 |
Perhaps you should spend less time peeping in my windows. The basis of the
aspersions you're casting is..."questionable" at best.
|
md
|
|
response 43 of 44:
|
Jul 5 12:49 UTC 2000 |
[He's actually denying it. Too funny.]
So, is my conference ready yet?
|
twinkie
|
|
response 44 of 44:
|
Jul 5 21:03 UTC 2000 |
I neither confirmed nor denied anything.
Perhaps it's *your* eyesight that's faulty.
In any case, my conference is ready :-P
|