|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 19 new of 45 responses total. |
brighn
|
|
response 27 of 45:
| 
Sep 29 23:35 UTC 1994 |
Ooooh kinky! Can I watch next time?
|
kami
|
|
response 28 of 45:
|
Sep 30 15:32 UTC 1994 |
only if no one catches you at it...
|
brighn
|
|
response 29 of 45:
|
Sep 30 20:42 UTC 1994 |
I'd hide in your bedroom, but, I've seen your bedroom.
Ain't much room for hiding.
|
karenb
|
|
response 30 of 45:
|
Oct 1 16:15 UTC 1994 |
you wait until she gets interrupted then you go investigate.... and let
come what may.
|
lee
|
|
response 31 of 45:
|
May 22 19:35 UTC 1997 |
Miss Scarlet
Candlestick
Conservatory
|
orinoco
|
|
response 32 of 45:
|
May 27 20:13 UTC 1997 |
Mr Plum, in the living room, with a long gap between responses.
|
lee
|
|
response 33 of 45:
|
May 27 21:25 UTC 1997 |
<lee wonders how a long gap between responses is used in murder>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 34 of 45:
|
May 27 21:34 UTC 1997 |
If it's long enough, you can sharpen one end and use it as a spear.
|
remmers
|
|
response 35 of 45:
|
May 28 02:08 UTC 1997 |
If it's long enough, people start to die of boredom or even just
plain old age.
|
lee
|
|
response 36 of 45:
|
May 28 20:14 UTC 1997 |
Ahh, but what is long enough?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 37 of 45:
|
Jun 1 18:31 UTC 1997 |
Long enough to reach your waist.
Or your feet.
Or both
|
mary
|
|
response 38 of 45:
|
Jun 1 18:51 UTC 1997 |
What's a waist? ;-)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 39 of 45:
|
Jun 3 18:20 UTC 1997 |
What a waste...
|
lee
|
|
response 40 of 45:
|
Jun 4 23:55 UTC 1997 |
<lee wonders about people who have waist at their feet>
|
i
|
|
response 41 of 45:
|
Apr 11 00:42 UTC 1998 |
Isn't that the point at which Medicare pays for liposuction? Or just
a symptom of landing feet-first from the 33rd story balcony?
|
lee
|
|
response 42 of 45:
|
Apr 15 18:12 UTC 1998 |
freak accident
|
snowth
|
|
response 43 of 45:
|
Apr 20 00:06 UTC 1998 |
Oh really? Why would that be?
|
i
|
|
response 44 of 45:
|
May 18 22:18 UTC 1998 |
Because the Queen of Hearts suffered indigestion after eating a box of
chocolates which came from the wrong side of the looking-glass.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 45 of 45:
|
May 30 08:34 UTC 2002 |
resp:0 Regarding this situation, I'd just have to break down the door,
because I would have come to consume them, in various ways.
(You said her. That's usually a different kind of eat.)
resp:44 Looking-glass? You callin' me a Peeping Tom? Heh, if
anything, I am a peepin' pimp, lookin' for mo' hos.
|