|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 84 responses total. |
maus
|
|
response 26 of 84:
| 
Feb 4 02:27 UTC 2007 |
I do like the idea of having a small mud on here. I do get sick of
having to use my large machine when I want to game (WoW is a pig, and I
could have damn-near as much fun without the big, resource intensive
graphics)
|
vivekm1234
|
|
response 27 of 84:
|
Feb 4 03:51 UTC 2007 |
Why not a conf where articles from anywhere on the bbs, are linked in to it,
the conf itself being searchable. However, how do we control abuse?
We might wind up porting our junk on to the WWW. It will have to be
moderated in some form :(. I suggest allowing accounts with X points,
access to this facility and a limit of 1 post per month.
Perhaps this method can be used to control SPAM and abuse? Only people
willing to devote a substantial amt of time to using a account get uber
Grex facilities because they will have to build points (measure based
on time spent logged in, cpu resources consumed, commands typed, posts
posted, party lines, user feedback etc)? We could try to implement some
sort of bot-checker using tel?
|
lar
|
|
response 28 of 84:
|
Feb 4 11:32 UTC 2007 |
Why not have a granola bar givaway? Or you could have a eco friendly
"green" contest and first prize could be a bag of trail mix!
hmmm hmmmm good!
|
kingjon
|
|
response 29 of 84:
|
Feb 4 13:46 UTC 2007 |
There was a "best of" conference once, when Grex first started; it's called the
"archive" conference. The last item in it is 2001.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 30 of 84:
|
Feb 4 15:30 UTC 2007 |
The problem with linking to the searchable conference is huge.
There was a big user controversy when we made Grex web accessible. That only
happened because the policy explicitly states that the items will not be
searchable on the web.
There is no way to have items cross linked between a searchable conference
and a nonsearchable one. For an item posted (whether originally or by
linking) in a nonsearchable conference, replies must be nonsearchable.
If someone linked an item from the searchable conference into a nonsearchable
one, there is no way to keep replies posted in the nonsearchable conference
from becoming searchable.
I'm not sure I'd want to, either. An item with half the replies blanked out
is pretty hard to read through.
|
vivekm1234
|
|
response 31 of 84:
|
Feb 4 16:05 UTC 2007 |
Re #29: :) I can see why - some of them are pretty neat. No fights and on
topic.
|
easlern
|
|
response 32 of 84:
|
Feb 5 13:57 UTC 2007 |
Okay, Viv- you can be host of the Grex MUD. Uh, how does it work? :)
|
vivekm1234
|
|
response 33 of 84:
|
Feb 5 16:58 UTC 2007 |
Host? you just compile and run it. There will be some default rooms and
stuff. Of course ppl that are interested can update the room descriptions and
add new rooms but i think you need to know LPC for that..or some other MUD
language..
|
easlern
|
|
response 34 of 84:
|
Feb 5 17:15 UTC 2007 |
Isn't it a multiplayer thing that someone needs to host on a server?
|
vivekm1234
|
|
response 35 of 84:
|
Feb 5 20:24 UTC 2007 |
Yeah..it is multiplayer..It would be hosted on Grex via loopback..
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 36 of 84:
|
Feb 5 23:08 UTC 2007 |
There is a conference that has a few items about muds, and a couple
roleplaying conferences.
|
maus
|
|
response 37 of 84:
|
Feb 7 02:11 UTC 2007 |
What mud are we thinking of running ? I remember playing in one called
"Major Mud" on a small BBS in Austin and I believe my partner played in
several back in college.
If there is stuff that needs doing (testing, documenting, etc), I can
probably pitch in a couple of hours a week, but probably not loads more
than that.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 38 of 84:
|
Feb 7 02:49 UTC 2007 |
Could we run LORD on here somehow?
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 39 of 84:
|
Feb 8 03:07 UTC 2007 |
Actually, there is a conference devoted to muds, called "mud".
|
easlern
|
|
response 40 of 84:
|
Feb 8 14:05 UTC 2007 |
Seek ye the conference known as "mud" and all thy questions shalt be answered!
|
easlern
|
|
response 41 of 84:
|
Feb 8 15:22 UTC 2007 |
I started an item there. :)
|
naftee
|
|
response 42 of 84:
|
Feb 9 02:57 UTC 2007 |
:)
|
vivekm1234
|
|
response 43 of 84:
|
Feb 9 16:11 UTC 2007 |
We need/demand Gnuchess to help while away precious hours!
|
easlern
|
|
response 44 of 84:
|
Feb 9 16:33 UTC 2007 |
Somebody can compile it and make it readable to everyone in their home
directory?
|
trig
|
|
response 45 of 84:
|
Feb 14 06:43 UTC 2007 |
cross per usual has really great ideas that are shot down quickly, also
per-usual. :(
|
ric
|
|
response 46 of 84:
|
Feb 21 14:25 UTC 2007 |
re 0 - hey cross, come to m-net, someone bought you a citizenship :)
|
cross
|
|
response 47 of 84:
|
Feb 21 14:29 UTC 2007 |
I saw that! I'm on M-Net frequently; I just find that general has more going
on than I can keep up with.
|
ric
|
|
response 48 of 84:
|
Feb 21 14:42 UTC 2007 |
I actually avoided general for pretty much all of last year... sticking to
sports, policy, sysop, programming, etc... I'm back in the general conference
again but only due to LIBERAL use of "forget". I recently entered items in
the tv conference about LOST and Battlestar Galactica.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 49 of 84:
|
Feb 21 14:42 UTC 2007 |
Don't forget to check out the chess conference where our very own Nate
is getting his ass handed to him by tanis.
|
cross
|
|
response 50 of 84:
|
Feb 21 16:24 UTC 2007 |
awesome.....
|