You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   228-252   253-264        
 
Author Message
12 new of 264 responses total.
scott
response 253 of 264: Mark Unseen   Feb 19 23:37 UTC 1999

Er, to clarify my take on dogs in the park as an analogy:  We could ban dogs
if all dogs were a problem.  If only a few dogs were a problem, we might go
after the owners of those dogs to handle the problem.
jazz
response 254 of 264: Mark Unseen   Feb 24 17:20 UTC 1999

        It's an appropriate metaphor;  GREX isn't in as big of a need of
funding as Arbornet was at the time that I wrote that recommendation. 

        To extend the analogy, though, the owners of the dogs have refused to
discipline them; and the dogs have driven out several park regulars - now what
do you do?
lilmo
response 255 of 264: Mark Unseen   Apr 14 00:15 UTC 1999

If this discussion is to be continued in its present form, it should be in
another item.  This item is for discussing the IIT prblem(s), and the issues
that the whole situation raises.

Sorry.
mystix
response 256 of 264: Mark Unseen   Apr 27 19:10 UTC 1999

i am a student from iit and got accesss to this place thru the proxy server
of our place even though the telnet service has been withdrawn.i would like
to point out one thing that banning out a place won't solve anything.say you
ban out iitkgp,then all i have to do is to connect to a place like diversion
and telnet here and BINGO therer goes GREX.the whole point is that since the
telnet access was anonymous,there was no way the authorities could have done
anything about it.now GREX can only be accessed thru the proxy server which
means the computer i am connecting from can be identified.then i think GREX
is safe at least from the perverted users from iitkgp.
as far as usage of GREX it is true that most of us use it for free e-maiol
facility.anyway,this whole incident was too bad and shoulln't have happened
just for a few wrong guys all the users had to suffer.
you are doing a great work in GREX.keep it up.
janc
response 257 of 264: Mark Unseen   Apr 28 05:32 UTC 1999

We certainly never wanted a permanent ban, and regret that that happened.
Though if IIT really can't identify people who telnet out of there, then
maybe we are just as happy that that isn't possible anymore.  We believe
sites must be able to take responsibility for policing the actions of
people who connect to the net through their site.  We try very hard to
do that for people who use Grex for various kinds of access to the net.

If you can connect here via a proxy, then that is fine with us.  We don't
want to ban any one. You are welcome here.
lilmo
response 258 of 264: Mark Unseen   Apr 30 21:28 UTC 1999

The point was never to ban ppl, but to make sure that troublemakers could be
handled.  Since troublemakers were coming through there anonymously, they
could not be identified (apparently), and not held accountable.  They, (and
the majority of users from IIT who were NOT troublemakers), are welcome to
come in ways that allow for some tracking to be done at the other end, so that
trouble can be laid at the proper feet.

In short, welcome back!
polygon
response 259 of 264: Mark Unseen   May 25 19:09 UTC 1999

Wow.  Interesting item.
pfv
response 260 of 264: Mark Unseen   May 25 19:53 UTC 1999

        <shrug> Ban it, block it, and diversion as well..

        Reap the accounts and save the space - they are not worth the
        effort.
steve
response 261 of 264: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 04:09 UTC 1999

   I will disagree with everything Pete said in #260.

   However, IIT is back with a new ip address and has been, since June 1st.
It's been nine weeks now since they got access, with little problem.

   Now, I have a question: can I now delete the IIT accounts that hasven't
been logged into since November 20th or last year?  Given anyone at IITKGP
has had 9.5 weeks now to log in (at least 390 have) I think we can safely
remove these accounts.

   Back when we found out that IIT had blocked Grex on their side, we put
a stop to reaping of all IIT acocunts.  This of course included the usual
amount of accounts that were used once and forgotten, people who graduated,
etc.  We've been tying up disk space for some time now with this, and I 
think its now OK for us to remove those IIT acounts that haven't been
touched in these 9.5 weeks since the ban was lifted.  I've talked to some
IIT student, all of whom knew about Grex's usability very soon after it
was possible, so I don't think there are many people there who don't
know that they can use Grex.

   If people think its OK, I'd like to remove these accounts now.
jshafer
response 262 of 264: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 04:53 UTC 1999

Go for it...
scott
response 263 of 264: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 11:49 UTC 1999

Sounds fine to me.
cmcgee
response 264 of 264: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 14:47 UTC 1999

Yes, do it.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   228-252   253-264        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss