You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   227-251   252-255        
 
Author Message
4 new of 255 responses total.
void
response 252 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 14:56 UTC 2000

   grex does not own my text and does not have the right to force me to
continue publishing it.  period.
janc
response 253 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 14:19 UTC 2000

An E-mail message from Joe Saul, with some new information:
========================================================================
From: "Joseph M. Saul"
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:05:34
To: janc@grex.cyberspace.org
Subject: User Control of Posts

One of the arguments raised against allowing Grex users to delete their
own posts has been that other big online services (I think Deja News
and Slashdot were cited) don't permit it, so it obviously isn't an
issue.  Well, guess what...

Deja News *does* allow users to remove news posts from their archive,
and all they insist on is that you be able to receive email messages at
the address from which you posted the messages in question.  No
notarized letters, no other anal-retentive bullshit.  Yes, you do have
to go to their staff, but since you didn't enter the post from a "Deja
News account" in the same way that Grexers enter their posts from their
Grex accounts, they don't have an alternative.  Here's the URL to their
form:

  http://www.deja.com/forms/nuke.shtml

In other words, Grex is not following "current trends," wouldn't drag
the big guys in if a user sues because the big guys *do* provide a
convenient means for deleting posts, and in fact respects the rights of
its posters less than Deja News does.  Which is saying something.

Feel free to post this in the appropriate location.

  -- Joe
gull
response 254 of 255: Mark Unseen   Jul 19 15:34 UTC 2000

I noticed that, too.  They do make you jump through some hoops -- if you no
longer own the email address the messsage was posted from, you can't remove
it, and you need to submit a seperate request for each message you want
removed.
mooncat
response 255 of 255: Mark Unseen   Aug 1 20:48 UTC 2000

Well, that makes sense. Kind of similar to if you lose your password 
here, and have another e-mail address listed in your .plan and write 
from it requesting staff reset your password, after perhaps some more 
verification it will be done.  Or that's how it used to work, they may 
have changed it in the last few years.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   227-251   252-255        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss